First, there may be an umbrella.
First of all, there may be a stubborn problem with umbrellas. If the corresponding government officials or police officers do not have the corresponding suspects to take refuge, the handling of the case will be full of doubts, which will hinder the handling of the case and make the case in a state of stagnation.
Second, the evidence is insufficient.
Second, the evidence is insufficient. For the whistleblower, he may have been cheated, but in fact he didn't collect enough evidence, or the police didn't collect enough evidence to prove that Min Xu was a fraudster. After all, a society ruled by law needs to pay attention to evidence.
Third, it may be that Min Xu has destroyed the corresponding clue evidence.
In addition, it is possible that Min Xu has destroyed the corresponding clue evidence. If Min Xu destroys all offline evidence or online evidence in various ways after learning that his criminal facts are exposed, it will bring great difficulties to the investigation of the case.
Fourth, there may be problems in the work efficiency of the corresponding police station.
In addition, there may be a problem with the efficiency of the corresponding police station. After all, for the handling of a case, the result can be obtained within one month under normal circumstances, and this incident has been delayed for nearly one year, which has caused great damage to the interests of the parties.
Matters needing attention of Tangshan public security organs;
We should attach great importance to this incident, let the corresponding criminal suspect pay the due legal price, and arrest all criminal members together through this clue.