Continued from the hair problem, it entered the spiritual world and introduced the concept of "free will" in western culture. Continued 5 and 6 all wrote Voldemort, and analyzed and explained the meaning of "free choice" from both positive and negative angles. Voldemort and Harry are the core of the ruling class, and their choice is the choice of good and evil. These two articles are also the most difficult in the whole series. It's much easier to climb the mountain of philosophy, followed by Ma Pingchuan of law, and you can also have more space to analyze plots and characters. Today, the topic of "choice" continues. Compared with Harry and Hermione, they are both good camps and the choice between "good" and "better". Hermione can't marry Harry because of her blood and class composition, but the most important thing is her personal quality. The popular loan word in the usage field is Hermione's "morality". Morality is related to birth, but there is still room for choice in the middle.
Continued 3 After discussing the bloodline theory, I once left a small tail (which was later deleted for cohesion reasons, and some friends may not have seen it):
As mentioned above, an important difference between the ruler and the ruled is whether they attach importance to rules or not. Besides the rules of the stadium, the most important thing at Hogwarts is of course the school rules, that is, the school rules.
Hermione is not a good student at Hogwarts, at least compared with Harry.
This tail is actually a clue, that is, I, a person who is not proficient in the original work, am tired of writing and want to borrow some materials from the former party member following Zhu Gekongming's example. Let's talk about Zhai driving a straw boat outside the village, beating drums and shouting, only to see that the army was absent-minded and rushed to shoot a few arrows. Take a closer look at the house. It turns out that among Cao Cao, everyone has a genetic gene. They have been studying hard, or studying whether Liu Huangshu himself is a pure blood clan, or studying which country Sun Zhongmou's blue-eyed purple beard comes from. (Please refer to the information in Continued 3 for details). This house is very helpless and depressed. Therefore, the details in this article may still be unsatisfactory, all of which are the fault of the original party. . . . . .
However, Zhai Kongming had many tricks in his kit, so he borrowed the west wind because he couldn't borrow the arrow. Find a feather fan, set up a seven-star platform, face Britain, and read a mantra: Tang is safe and sound. Three days later, the news came from London:
This case is fresh in everyone's memory and there are various opinions. I borrowed it from this house to introduce "How do the British view the rules" or "British legal view". Sorry, unforgivable curse, I just wanted to say hello to the host.
It's a long story, but we have to start from the principle.
Anyway, Caochuan borrowed a few arrows and extracted two messages from netizens:
"Obeying the rules is the basic feature of the law, and it is also an important dividing line to distinguish the concepts of rulers and civilians." ..... This sentence is so funny in China.
Contrary to the teacher's point of view, the last sentence thinks that Hermione's great shortcoming is that she is very concerned about the school rules and can't see the overall situation. I remember in Sorcerer's Stone, a trio visited the campus at night, and Hermione struggled with the school rules, but Harry said that when Hogwarts didn't exist, the school rules were meaningless. Since Harry is a man who doesn't follow the established rules, why is Harry an excellent ruler?
These two pieces of news are very representative and can reflect some China people's views on the rules. This is what I destroyed today. Let's start with the first one:
Rulers tend to obey the rules. I don't think the rulers of China are any different. They also tend to obey the rules. Why?
Because rulers are selfish.
It is in their interest to obey the rules, so they obey them.
Explain that rulers are not officials. Officials include rulers, people with civilian mentality, and even slaves. A small civil servant who carries out the orders of his superiors with a fixed salary does not belong to the ruler. On the contrary, entrepreneurs, scholars and religious leaders can be counted as rulers as long as they have the will, the decision-making power and the sense of responsibility. As mentioned earlier, the difference between rulers and slaves lies in whether reason controls desire, not that rulers have no desire (selflessness), but that rulers can control their own desires with reason. You can even say that their desire is particularly strong, their ambition is great and their ambition is far away. In order to get the whole world, they gave up all kinds of specific small interests. Public ownership means private ownership, and vice versa.
From the ruler's point of view, the greatest interest is the dominant position. With this position, everything else is trivial-what's the point of embezzling a little money for those who own the state treasury? This is the truth that there are corrupt officials, emperors who are not greedy, bosses of state-owned enterprises who take bribes, and bosses of private enterprises who do not take bribes. As analyzed earlier, rulers must abide by the rules, because rules (laws) are passionless rationality, and giving up rules for personal interests is the road to slavery. Since ancient times, those who fight for the world have ignored their families. Liu Bang is willing to part with squire, the chairman is willing to part with shore English, and Tang Sanzang is willing to part with female goblins. It is not enough to pursue great things.
On the other hand, what happens if you can't bear it?
Ke Jie Cheng
Hu Changqing
In 2000, the anti-corruption campaign shot two provincial and ministerial cadres: Cheng, chairman of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, and Vice Governor of Jiangxi Province. Look at their resumes. Both of them came from civilian families and entered politics after passing the college entrance examination or joining the army. There have been many cases of anti-corruption in recent years, and quite a few corrupt officials have similar backgrounds. This house is also a civilian, and there is no intention of discriminating against civilians, but there are some problems in it. Let's look at a virtual letter from home:
Son, when you were in college, my uncle's third brother-in-law helped you pay 200 yuan for your tuition. Now his four families are working in cities, fighting with people and killing them. Try to get him out. My third brother-in-law brought you 200 Jin of corn from his hometown. Don't forget this when you are the mayor. Mom.
Think from the mayor's point of view. what should he do ？ The mayor has the ability to intervene, and his mother's feelings are understandable. The problem is that once he starts, he will break the law again and again, because his relatives in his hometown are in constant stream, so the risk of his falling off the horse will increase sharply. What does the mayor get? "200 Jin of corn"? Therefore, it is unreasonable for the children of civilians to be in politics for a long time, which is actually a kind of protection for themselves and their families. Pure bloodmage has an advantage in this respect, and will not receive such a note at all. In elections in western countries, a card that aristocratic families often play for grassroots candidates is "incorruptibility" (or attacking opponents for "corruption"). Two-thirds of Japanese parliamentarians come from aristocratic families, because voters also understand this truth.
Former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, his grandfather was Prime Minister Ichiro Hatoyama, his father was Foreign Minister Hatoyama Iichiro, and his grandfather was the founder of Bridgestone, one of the three largest tire companies in the world. Typical political family. )
(American President Nixon and Japanese Prime Minister tanaka kakuei, both from small towns and civilians (shop assistants/apprentices), both tend to do whatever it takes in their political styles, and their political lives ended in scandals (Watergate incident and Lockheed bribery case), both of whom are old friends of the people of China).
As I said before, all law students must destroy your "civilian mentality" if they really want to enter the professional state. The "family care" in virtual books is the common people's mentality. On the level of ordinary people, caring for family is a virtue, but for rulers, it is not a virtue but a danger, which must be eliminated as soon as possible. Muggle Hermione finally embarked on this road. Hermione passed the inspection of slug club in Ha 6, and the civilian training class ended, and she entered the ranks of rulers. So in the opening of The Next Hallows, Hermione used magic to erase all her parents' memories about herself:
Many girls may have cried in this passage, which is really sad, but this is the "cruel reason" needed to cast rulers. Since Hermione chose to join the ruler's fight, she must cut off contact with the Muggle world, which is also a kind of protection for her parents. Hermione, you are crying. After crying, dry your tears and continue to fight.
By the way, "cruel rationality" has side effects, which will make people become ruthless over time, so Hermione has always been "strong-willed" in the film. Her personality is actually like Tanchun in a Dream of Red Mansions, and she has been trying to get rid of Aunt Zhao's muddy blood. The problem is that once she returns to the marriage level from the battlefield, Hermione's painful family relationship has become a necessity in family life. Tanchun finally got married, and Hermione gave way to Ginny, whose parents are witches, so there is no need to "everything is empty" before the Armageddon. This is indeed unfair to civilians, but it is indeed the result of their own choice.
Eight, Hogwarts school rules (in)
The analysis of the ruler's tendency to obey the rules ends here. Let's respond to the second message: "Since Harry is a person who doesn't follow the established rules, why is Harry an excellent ruler?"
In fact, the concept of Anglo-American rules covers four sentences:
1. Rulers attach importance to rules; 2. They are not bound by rules; 3. Rule of fear of civilians; They want to abolish the rules completely.
According to teacher Deng Zhenglai, concept 3 is the "Legalist" in China's jurisprudence, and concept 4 is the "right standard". We have already analyzed the fourth concept, that is, those theories in China's jurisprudence that put desire above reason, only talk about rights and don't talk about obligations, and seduce Muggles every day with "citizens have the right to get" (in fact, "the country should be free") are no longer introduced. Let's analyze 23. These two sentences are actually one sentence.
This time we will start with the concept of China. In modern Chinese, law is a coordinate compound word, which consists of two morphemes: law and law. Have you ever thought about the difference between "law" and "law"
A girl stood up and spoke: I can accept marrying a lawyer, but I can't accept marrying a mage.
Please sit down and get married. Article 10 will be discussed again. Let me start with a few formal classes. This is my profession, the history of Chinese legal system.
In ancient China, "law" and "law" were once different concepts. "Fa" originally refers to temperament, because the scale is as neat as a ruler, and later it is cited as "uniformity". After Shang Yang's political reform, he always expressed the formulation of dynasties, from Qin law to Qing law.