Tianjin Xiangyun Financial Manager surrendered himself, and the People's Procuratorate charged the defendant Jong Li with the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits with indictment No.2019. In May 19, he filed a public prosecution with our hospital and put forward sentencing suggestions, and then in June 165438+ 10, 65438+2020. Our court formed a collegial panel according to law and heard the case in public. Tianjin Baodi District People's Procuratorate appointed prosecutor Liu Ting to appear in court to support the public prosecution. Defendant Jong Li and his defender Jaco participated in the lawsuit.

1. During the trial, the procuratorate twice suggested postponing the trial because the case needed supplementary investigation; Approved by Tianjin No.1 Intermediate People's Court, the trial period was extended for three months; This court will suspend the trial once. The trial is now over.

2. The People's Procuratorate of Baodi District of Tianjin accused the defendant Li Zhong of being a salesman, team manager and team manager of Tianjin Xiangyun Shengtai Technology Co., Ltd. (formerly known as "Tianjin Xiangyun Shengtai Investment Co., Ltd.") from February +04, 2065438 to July, 2065438, together with Meng Guixia and Tian Baoxia (all handled separately). Organize salesmen to publicize the wealth management products launched by Tianjin Xiangyun Investment Group Management Co., Ltd. by oral publicity and distributing leaflets, and promise high interest to attract funds from the public for Tianjin Xiangyun Investment Group Management Co., Ltd., including Zhao Xin and others 16 150 yuan. In order to prove the facts of the above allegations, the public prosecution agency submitted corresponding evidence to the court, arguing that the defendant Jong Li's behavior violated the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 176 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), and should be investigated for criminal responsibility for the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits. Defendant Jong Li surrendered himself voluntarily and truthfully confessed his crimes, which was a voluntary surrender.

3. The public prosecutor suggested that the defendant Jong Li be sentenced to two years, seven months to three years' imprisonment and fined. Defendant Jong Li has no objection to the facts and nature of the accusation. The defender has no objection to the nature of the accusation, and puts forward the following defense opinions: 1, the defendant Jong Li surrendered himself and can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment; 2. The defendant Jong Li is not a proposer or planner, and his subjective malignancy is small; 3. Defendant Jong Li pleaded guilty and pleaded guilty voluntarily, requesting the court to give him a lighter punishment within the range of sentencing.