At present, the investigation has come to an end, and the main issues of public concern are as follows:
1. About baby identification. 1992, the hospital uses a unified disinfection quilt with a round card corresponding to the bed number of the lying-in woman to identify the identity of the baby.
2. On the issue of maternal isolation of hepatitis B .. According to the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases (1989) and the revised versions in 2004 and 20 13, pregnant women and newborns with hepatitis B do not need to be isolated separately. Du Mouzhi had a caesarean section in the operating room, and Xu gave birth in the delivery room. They have different production sites and don't live in the same ward.
3. About baby care. The hospital implements the separation management of mother and baby, and the ward and delivery room are two sets of nursing staff. After the baby is born, it is weighed, wrapped and checked by the mother, and then put into the nursery for centralized management. At that time, there were three shifts in the nursery, and the nurse on duty was responsible for delivering babies, bathing newborns, changing clothes and artificial feeding. The baby takes a bath once a day, and two nurses are in charge. One is responsible for bathing and the other is responsible for dressing. After washing, the nursing staff will send the baby back to the nursery.
4. About medical records. Issue temporary treatment orders according to patients' needs; Long-term treatment list can be continued if there is no treatment change, and it is not necessary to send it every day. The pages of Du Mouzhi's medical records are consistent with the total pages of medical records recorded on the medical records bag. However, there are some problems in Du Mouzhi's medical record, such as wrong hospitalization number and bed number, no first visit record, and lack of HBsAg test sheet.
In the handwritten medical record, Du Mouzhi's original medical record number is 155849, and 155489 in the medical record is a clerical error, and the hospital has no hospitalization number155489; According to the staff's memory, the patient was arranged as 15 bed when he was admitted to the hospital, and was later adjusted to 16 bed. After the staff crossed out the bed number 15, the patient's real bed number was 16.
For Du Mou's first course record, I consulted the medical records of the same period and found a similar situation. The specific reason for Du Mouzhi's loss of hepatitis B surface antigen test paper is too old to be verified.
5. On the issue of compensation. According to the judgments of Kaifeng Intermediate People's Court (202 1) Yu 02 238 and 239, Huaihe Hospital paid the compensation according to law within the prescribed time limit.
6. About the current situation of hospital staff. Hospital employee Guo Xizhi, 1988 to 1996, worked in obstetrics and gynecology and retired in February 2008. 65438-0992, Guo Xizhi is a nurse in the obstetrics and gynecology office, not a head nurse, and does not participate in delivery room nursing. Since the incident of "manslaughter for 28 years", Guo Xizhi has been actively cooperating with all parties in the investigation.
Pan Tingting and Guo Xizhi are mother and daughter. They are ordinary employees in the pharmacy office of the hospital. They have never held any administrative positions, and their husbands are not hospital employees. Zhang Peng Hospital has four employees with the same name. Among them, Zhang Peng, who wrote the paper with Guo Xizhi, was in the Department of Nuclear Medicine, not Zhang Peng, the spokesman and director of the hospital's doctor-patient office.
Extended data:
The police informed the case.
On March 5th, 2002/KLOC-0, Xu entrusted his cousin Wang to report to the Gulou Branch of Kaifeng Public Security Bureau, claiming that Guo Mokuan, Du and medical staff Zheng Mou and Guo intentionally changed their children and were suspected of committing a criminal offence. On the same day, the Gulou Branch of Kaifeng Public Security Bureau accepted the case according to law.
On April 7th, 20021year, upon examination by Gulou Branch of Kaifeng Public Security Bureau, it was considered that the conditions for filing a case did not meet the provisions of Article 112 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), and it was decided not to file a case.
On April 8, 20021year, Gulou Branch of Kaifeng Public Security Bureau served the plaintiff Xu with the Notice of Not Filing a Case, informing him of the reasons for not filing a case, and that if Xu has any objection, he can apply for reconsideration or apply to the People's Procuratorate for the supervision of filing a case by the public security organ.
Beijing Daily client-"Wrong birth for 28 years" is a criminal offence? Police: No case will be filed! Henan University responded at 6 o'clock.
World Wide Web-Explanation of Henan University on the Event of "Wrong Life for 28 Years"