Demonstration draft of "the benevolent is invincible"
Thank you, Chairman. Hello. Today, our view is: the benevolent is invincible. As early as the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, Mencius once lobbied the kings of various countries, "The brave are fearless, the wise are undoubtedly, the sincere have faith, and the benevolent are invincible." What he meant at that time was that if you are benevolent, you will get the support and love of the people, so that your country will gradually become stronger, and there will be no strong enemies outside, thus dominating the world. It is also reasonable to put "invincible benevolent" under the harmonious society we are going to build today. What is benevolence? We believe that benevolence is a way and attitude to treat people. The true benevolent can be kind to others, to things, to learn, to forgive, to be both wise and brave; Internally, it shows itself as a calm and wise choice and challenge to the world, and externally, it shows itself as a policy that can win the hearts of the people. What else is invincible? Invincibility means making yourself stronger and stronger on the basis of "benevolence", so that you can be invincible for a long time. Below we will further demonstrate from the following three points:
First, the benevolent is invincible, which is not a general kindness, but more a manifestation of wisdom; Irrational love is not called "benevolence". I say "benevolence" means that rational people should be kind. Didn't you see that in history, the duke of Zhou vomited and swallowed, and the world turned its heart; If you don't see it, Emperor Taizong speaks widely, and the prosperity is peaceful. On the contrary, the tyranny of Shang and Zhou dynasties and the uprising of the people; On the contrary, Qin Huang is ruthless, which makes the offensive and defensive situation different. All this shows that the benevolent is invincible.
Second, the invincible benevolent is not without enemies. Our view is that invincible means that benevolent people can rely on their own wisdom to make themselves invincible for a long time. Have you noticed that at the beginning of the founding of the People's Republic of China, China was struggling; But in the end, we * * * have been benevolent to the people through the "three major disciplines" and the "eight major prohibitions", thus allowing more than 70 million party member to take root in China and blossom everywhere.
Third, the benevolent we think today is even more benevolent. The ancients said, "If you get more help, you get less help." A true benevolent will certainly give full play to the charm of self-personality and eliminate the hatred between people. Give full play to the appeal of leaders and turn hostilities into friendship; Give full play to everyone's subjective initiative and enhance self-strength. Therefore, the saying that "the benevolent is not necessarily invincible" is not true, because the true benevolent will make himself stronger and stronger, instead of blindly making himself invincible externally. Our argument is over, thank you!
Debate on "A benevolent person may not be invincible"
Thank you, Chairman. Hello. The other debater said that the benevolent is invincible; In our opinion, the benevolent may not be invincible.
Relativity tells us that there is no absolute thing in the world, only relative things exist, and everything is the unity of opposites of both sides. As the saying goes, the benevolent is benevolent, and those who can be called "benevolent" must be people who are kind in nature, tolerant of all beings and all things, and have infinite compassion and great love. However, can the benevolent really be invincible? Countless examples of "people are good at being bullied and horses are good at being ridden" tell us that this is not the case. Not to mention Qu Zi who was worried about people's livelihood by the Miluo River, but was seriously injured and threw himself into the river; Not to mention diligence and love for the people, Fan Zhongyan, a famous minister in a foreign land, has been repeatedly excluded. Obviously, as far as external factors are concerned, the benevolent has met his opponent; Internally, as the saying goes, man's greatest enemy is himself. Perhaps, the benevolent is independent of others? The answer is no, so all the benevolent people sitting in their seats have enemies. Below we will discuss from the following two points;
First, good people love others. As we all know, gold is not enough, and no one is perfect. Similarly, there is no absolute benevolent. No matter how good a person is, he will have a day in diamond cut diamond. If the benevolent is really invincible, why is there a famous warning saying that "a loving mother often defeats a child", why is there a story that a bodhisattva-hearted farmer was bitten by a snake, and why is there a story that Mr. Dong Guo was wolfed down to teach us not to be too kind, let alone simply love the future and love the whole life? This tells us that the so-called benevolent people are also human beings, and they will encounter foreign enemies that they cannot defeat.
Secondly, let's look at the word "nothing" together. Modern Chinese Dictionary tells us that the so-called "nothing" means "nothing"; Then according to the other debater, invincible means that there is no enemy at all. Materialist dialectics tells us that there is nothing absolute in the world, and the word "invincible" itself is a metaphysical statement. Take a look at five thousand years in China. It has always been a cool breeze, and the long river is flowing. How many great men have fallen, and how many benevolent people have fallen? They have material things, but are they really invincible in spirit? The answer is no. Besides, in today's society, people are curious and unpredictable. When a benevolent person meets someone who conflicts with his own interests, can he really calm down and make himself peaceful? Who hasn't been confused and lost in the world of mortals? This is called "different people have different opinions".
To sum up, in the life of a benevolent person, although foreign enemies can be blocked, internal enemies are stronger; Everyone has enemies. The other side's view that "the benevolent is invincible" is untenable. Our argument is over, thank you!
At the same time, we used a somewhat "adventurous" trick at the end, which is roughly as follows: If the other side's "benevolent person is not invincible" is the original proposition in our high school mathematics, then its negative proposition is "invincible person is not benevolent", that is to say, the other side has logically admitted our point of view.
Although this is not good for us, it is difficult for the other side to react under normal circumstances, so the judges also added innovation to us, which is why we entered the school cup debate competition.
In addition, we attach materials for reference when broadcasting the debate:
[Discussion] The benevolent is invincible/the benevolent is not necessarily invincible.
Thank you, Chairman. Hello. Mencius said, "Benevolence is invincible." It means that you are kind and loved by the people, and no one can compete with you for the world. As far as today's world is concerned, we advocate being a benevolent person, because what is truly invincible in the world is benevolence and kindness, because "benevolent people are invincible."
Be kind to others, be able to handle interpersonal relationships well, and naturally have no enemies without making enemies, opposing or being angry.
Only when people have different opinions can they get everyone's approval, give play to the power of personality charm, the authority summoned by leaders and the subjective initiative of employees, and naturally there will be no opponents.
The true benevolent lies in being able to eliminate hatred, turn hostilities into friendship, and turn hostilities into friendship. So I won't stand on my own feet.
What is benevolence and righteousness? How to achieve benevolence and righteousness? "Good and evil can't be tolerated" Benevolence and righteousness must first eradicate evil, and then it can move towards harmony between benevolence and righteousness. Therefore, the meaning of the world is a world without evil. The meaning of doing things is to use the method of not making enemies, and the meaning of being a man is to turn the wicked into the benefit of all beings. If this can be done, how can the benevolent fight the enemy? How can there be enemies who threaten him? Is it illusory to be a good person in today's world? Do we really want this to happen in this world? Ask the other debater to answer directly.
Yan Wen: First of all, I pointed out that the other party made a mistake. "The meaning of doing things is to use the method of not making enemies, to be a man, and to turn the wicked into the benefit of all beings."
"You also said that this is to assimilate the wicked. Before assimilation, did the benevolent become the enemy of the wicked? What we are discussing today is that the benevolent is invincible, which means that someone is kind and generous in thought, morality, quality and personality. However, there is a contradiction in itself. The so-called gold is not enough, and no one is perfect. Then, invincible: nothing means nothing, so invincible means no enemy. Think about how many heroes and great men China has had in five thousand years. Can we really live in peace when the interests of the benevolent conflict with those of the second person? In this treacherous society, I certainly sincerely hope that there will be more benevolent people and fewer wicked people in the society. However, this does not mean that the benevolent will not be hostile to this person. I would like to ask the other party to give me an example today to prove that a benevolent person never has enemies.
Pro: Please ask opponents to explain why Beijing Youth Daily gave the player the title of "Duncan".
Counterparty: Sorry, I don't know much about football. I don't even know who Duncan is.
Pro: Well, one more question: Theoretically, if a person really helps others, will his enemy be the one he helps?
Opposing party: Of course, because he is a benevolent person, in the words of the opposing debater, it is to educate the wicked. Of course he doesn't care if the people he educates are his enemies. For a person who returns good for evil, he is even more benevolent.
Pro: If you don't succeed, are you still a benevolent person? Benevolent people need natural training, just like learning from the west. Has the other party ever seen a great natural benevolent?
Against: At the beginning of life, there was no good or evil. So, of course, there can be no natural benevolent. The so-called benevolent person has been clearly stated in our argument, and I don't think it is necessary to explain it again. Of course, we can't just look at the appearance of a thing, but also determine it through various objective facts.
Pro: I think the other side didn't make it clear in the argument. Let's see what each other has to say. "Benevolence is invincible, which means that someone is kind and generous in thought, morality, quality and personality." So how can we achieve this state? Before it is achieved, that is, when the enemy is still the enemy, the benevolent is not benevolent.
Excuse me: Why is there the title of "Invincible Benevolence" in this world? Is it just groundless? Does the other party really want to put more enemies for the benevolent?
Pro: The so-called "invincible benevolent" is just a subjective view of our world. It has no objective basis in itself, because in this treacherous society, society wants to attract us with such dazzling titles, so that we can all do good deeds and accumulate virtue. But can we determine the existence of a thing only through our subjective consciousness? Haven't the opposing debaters seen anything that exists objectively? Please help me explain the concept of the word "nothing"
Opposing party: A benevolent person is invincible. Doesn't mean that this person is invincible from birth to death. I don't understand that being cared for and educated by others will hate him. I have never heard that this is a fact in today's society. How do you "know the truth with your eyes"?
Who put forward the idea that the benevolent is invincible?
Founder: Mencius, how do you "see the facts with your eyes"? Please refute it head on. Thank you.
Counterparty: Everyone's cognition is limited, and people have subjective initiative, so we can't fully understand any fact, so we must combine objective factors to judge the true value of the fact.
Let me ask you again, are our enemies here just enemies? Does hostile relationship count?
Founder: I also want to combine the facts. What is your factual basis? This is the third time.
Against: Of course, it is his influence and achievements in dealing with interpersonal relationships.
Excuse me, is our enemy here just an enemy? No hostile relationship?
On the positive side: why do benevolent people still have hostile relations when they have settled interpersonal relationships, educated others and been awarded the title of benevolent people? Please tell me, thank you.
Counterparty: Of course, this only tells us that this benevolent man is missing an enemy at a certain point, but I want to ask the other party, when he is awarded the title of benevolent man, will he have no enemies around him? Please give an example ~ ~
Pro: Is it that the benevolent has no enmity? So is the murderer also among the benevolent people mentioned by the other party today?
Opposing party: Is a murderer necessarily not a benevolent person? I once remembered a case in which an old man killed his son. The whole village petitioned for him and asked the court to show mercy outside the law and let the old man go. Excuse me, is this murderer a benevolent man?
Founder: If it is illegal, he must not be benevolent. Excuse me: why should we be enemies of the benevolent?
Opposing party: We are all good people, and of course we will not be enemies of benevolent people. However, today, the thinking of the opposing side is too simple. Don't forget that there are many bad people in this world. These bad guys are definitely not as moral as the two of us.
Pro: Do bad people naturally like to make enemies? The other party may not think the bad guys are too cheap!
Counterparty: Then I want to ask my opponent, what is the relationship between the police and the thief?
Pro: What is the relationship between police, thieves and benevolent people?
Opposing Party: I remember that in the CCTV program "Touching China" in 2004, there was an anti-drug policeman whose name I forgot. He fought criminals for the benefit of the people and sacrificed his life? But these criminals are trying to kill him.
As the saying goes, no common cause, no common cause, no common cause, the other party must have heard about it.
Pro: The concept of "benevolent" in the other party's statement is "kindness and generosity in thought, morality, quality and personality", and now it is said that it is benevolent to subdue and arrest disciples. Now please unify this contradiction for me.
Against: There is no absolute benevolent in this world, so there is no absolute invincible. Today, I want to ask my opponent to help me name an absolute benevolent.
Pro: If the other debater thinks that there are no benevolent people, then what are we fighting for? If you think there are benevolent people, why do you divide them into absolute and relative ones? Does everything have to be divided like this? Someone asked me: Have you eaten? I'm confused. Should I answer in absolute or relative sense?
If you can answer me, I can give you the answer.
Counterparty: If my opponent asks me if I ate today, I can absolutely tell you that I ate it and it was wrong.
Now please ask another debater to give me an example of a benevolent person who has no enemies and has no hostile relationship with him ~ ~
Pro: Do opponents think that absolute benevolent is "kind and generous in thought, morality, quality and personality", while relative benevolent is "one who subdues and arrests disciples"? Please answer "Yes" or "No"
Counterparty: First of all, I want to tell my opponent that it is his behavior to subdue the captors, and "kindness and generosity in thought, morality, quality and personality" is his personality. How can a person's personality and behavior be dialectically unified?
Founder: This is also the question I want to ask you. How can a person's personality and behavior be dialectically unified? Why are they both benevolent?
Opposing party: The purpose of subduing captors is to punish evil and promote good. Why does he behave like this is because he is kind and generous in thought, morality, quality and personality. However, I need to explain here that it is goodwill to the broad masses of the people.
Founder: Thank you. Excuse me, why make enemies with benevolent people?
Counterparty: I have answered your question before, and I don't want to repeat it. But I think I can explain to you why some people are enemies of the benevolent, because the actions of the benevolent violate their interests.
Concluding remarks: Thank you, Madam President. After a heated debate, I finally understood the logic of the other debater today. His so-called invincible, that is, when this person succeeded in educating the wicked, he was named "invincible for the benevolent." This is the real invincible benevolent. But the other debater was short-sighted and only saw the glory of this benevolent man at the moment. But is there really no enemy behind this so-called benevolent? Today we are here to discuss whether the benevolent is invincible. In fact, I want to tell all of us to treat this society and individuals with the heart of doing good and accumulating virtue. However, this does not really mean that we really have no enemies. When our actions conflict with the interests of others. Let's quote a positive statement: Thank you, Madam President, and hello everyone. Mencius said, "Benevolence is invincible." It means that you are kind and loved by the people, and no one can compete with you for the world. As far as the world is concerned, we advocate being a benevolent person, because it is truly invincible. ...
At the beginning of this debate, an idea put forward by the positive side aroused my interest:
Therefore, the meaning of the world is a world without evil. The meaning of doing things is to use the method of not making enemies, and the meaning of being a man is to turn the wicked into the benefit of all beings.
For this sentence, I saw this problem-assimilating the wicked. For this, I really don't understand whether the so-called assimilation of the wicked is to assimilate yourself into the wicked or to assimilate the wicked into what you call benevolent people. If it is the latter, then I can also understand it this way-the righteous are the wicked! Isn't it contradictory that the benevolent in the world is a world without evil, and at the same time, the benevolent wants to assimilate the wicked?
Positive conclusion: Thank you.
In the whole game, what did the other party say? The benevolent has enemies, and the benevolent has enemies, but they never systematically told us why. What is "different people have different opinions" and what is "the expression of conflict of interest"? The other party has not explained whether the conflict of interest can come at the drop of a hat.
There is an old saying in China that "goodness is like water, and virtue carries things". Why? Because a person with high moral cultivation, a benevolent person, a tolerant heart, a tolerant heart, is sincere and compassionate, and is willing to "live in what others hate" (Lao Zi). Wherever he goes, he can see warm weather. Of course, the benevolent is invincible.
From the perspective of others, I always ask each other: If a person sincerely helps others, will his enemy be the person he helps? Obviously not. Who doesn't want to lose an enemy? If the other person's foundation today is based on the assertion that "he is good to me and I am his enemy". I have nothing to say. However, is this really the case? Is this really the law of society? I think everyone knows the answer.
The existence of the title of invincible benevolent can explain some problems. People are benevolent, and things are benevolent. Why are there enemies? The other party has never given us a qualitative answer, but based on the facts she said. Generally speaking, in fact, her so-called fact is that "the benevolent first has enemies, and then he becomes benevolent." This is as absurd as "this benevolent man was born with it" and "a benevolent man will have no enemies all his life". We are demonstrating that the benevolent man is invincible, not that man is invincible.
Admitting that the benevolent is invincible is the unity of ethics, human feelings and historical laws. Because people are emotional animals and rational animals. Then, in the face of a good man and a bad man, if you have to make enemies, why choose to make trouble with the good man? I really don't understand!
Only by acknowledging the proposition that the benevolent is invincible can human evolution be possible and the spiritual level of the nation be improved. Throughout history, mankind has stumbled from barbarism and killing, and along the way, it has become more and more democratic, more civilized and more merciful. The benevolent is invincible, not only now, but as long as human civilization exists and continues, no one can defeat the benevolent, the benevolent assimilates all enemies, and the benevolent is invincible! Thank you.
The conclusion of the invincible benevolent
Thank you, Chairman. Hello!
Our view is: the benevolent is invincible!
What is benevolence? Confucius said: Be kind to others, learn, forgive, be wise and brave, and improve your personality. This is "benevolence". The meaning of benevolence includes qualities such as morality, love, honesty and wisdom, which are embodied in all aspects of human beings; Invincible, invincible for a long time
The first thing to reiterate is:
1. According to the sacred words of Confucius, the benevolent is the embodiment of kindness and wisdom. Irrational so-called love or other hypocrisy does not belong to "benevolence", but love in words is measured. Mr. Dong Guo saved the wolf, which is called ignorance; The story of the farmer and the snake is called ignorance; Song Xianggong is fatuous if he doesn't catch two hairs; The weasel pays a New Year call to the chicken, which is called uneasy and kind. These are not true people with lofty ideals and should not be included in our debate.
2. Ren is not a perfect person, but a concrete analysis of a specific problem in a certain era, background and field. We allow benevolent people to limit their existence to a certain field, not perfectionism. Just like the British Prime Minister election after World War II, Churchill was unexpectedly defeated. The Times commented: At this moment, the British people need peacebuilders rather than military strategists, and the Churchill era is over. At this point, but who can deny Churchill's invincible position in World War II because he is not necessarily a good builder?
3. Invincibility of the benevolent is a long-term concept. The so-called enemy of the other side is just a blind man touching an elephant and looking at things in an isolated and static way. According to Hegel's little logic, the correct premise of size is the guarantee of correct conclusion. And the premise of the other party made a metaphysical mistake, how to prove it? We emphasize that "the benevolent is invincible" is a long-term judgment on the overall situation. As our argument 1 says, "Only by blowing away the yellow sand can we reach gold". After all, the result is "the benevolent is invincible."
Below we will summarize from two clues: time and space:
1. From the time point of view:
1. The long river of history has scoured out countless sands and screened out the most dazzling real gold-benevolence. The ancients said: if you gain the Tao, you will help more, but if you lose it, you will help less. Once again: cultivate one's morality, govern the country and level the world. It is precisely because of this idea that "different people have different opinions" that Zhou Wenwang has long divided the world into three parts, quietly; It is precisely because of Zhuge Liang's benevolent policy of "attacking the heart first" that the southwest rebellion was put down; It is precisely because of the "Huairou policy" that the Tang Dynasty had the "Zhenguan rule". The Shang and Zhou dynasties were tyrannical, and the people rebelled in the battle of Makino; Qin Shihuang's benevolence and righteousness were not applied, and the offensive and defensive trends were different; All experiences and lessons record that "the benevolent is invincible".
(2) Modern China implemented the benevolent policy of "loving the people, benefiting the people and benefiting the people". Chairman Mao said: "Our Eighth Route Army and New Fourth Army are fighting for the interests of the people." He also said, "The people's army is a teacher of righteousness." Although there were many difficulties at the beginning of the founding of the party, history finally proved that the people's choice was correct. A large number of party member have emerged, such as Jiao, Yu and so on. They have warmed the people with their feelings of fraternity and won their love and support.
Today, this 8 1 year-old political party, which represents the interests of the broad masses of the people, is persistently practicing. Love the people, be benevolent, and be based on the world. The party not only did it, but also did it right. With the flowers of the 16th National Congress in full bloom all over the motherland, we have reason to believe that China will surely move towards new glory under the leadership of the Party, because "the benevolent is invincible".
2. From the perspective of time:
1. The beauty of human nature is too benevolent and too wise. Why is the movie Forrest Gump popular all over the world? Because the hero's honest and kind nature deeply touched the hearts of the audience. Lu Xun is immortal because he has always been full of humanistic care for the people; Why did Zhou Enlai create the myth of diplomatic circles? Because he is kind-hearted and polite. Why do we hold high the great banner of Deng Xiaoping Theory is because it has the benevolent demeanor of "I am the son of the people of China, and I love my motherland and people". Kindness is the foundation of life and the most beautiful sentiment of human beings. Through the above enlightenment, we have to say that "the benevolent is invincible."
Benevolent people play an extremely important role in today's society. The ancients said: people's feelings are convinced of virtue and do not believe in strength. The reason why China stands among the world's great powers is that its moderate foreign policy treats others with kindness and has won the respect of the world. Religion plays an irreplaceable role in today's society because of its benevolent teachings; At that time, Wei Wei was popular all over the country with a song "Dedication of Love"; The reason why we use the outline of moral quality to summon honesty; The reason why our mountain teacher takes helping others and caring for others as its purpose, and establishes a new social work major, doesn't it show that the whole society is eager for kindness and agrees that benevolent people are invincible?
3. Benevolent people are invincible in the world. From Chirac's overwhelming victory over the right-wing party Pengle in the French general election to the United States' rejection of Iraq's weapons inspection report three times in the United Nations; From promoting the Middle East peace process to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Facts have proved that the benevolent will eventually become the law of justice and remain invincible.
In short, integrity, wisdom and kindness, no matter how many hardships we experience, will eventually sail to the other side of success and remain invincible for a long time.
Because the benevolent is invincible. Thank you.
Benevolent people, the conclusion may not be invincible.
It is said that the benevolent is invincible; I want to say that benevolent people have enemies.
The benevolent is also benevolent. Anyone who can be called "benevolent" should be tolerant of all beings and all things, with infinite compassion and wisdom. It is really not easy to be a benevolent person.
However, can the benevolent be invincible?
Not exactly.
Don't say that Tang Sanzang, who is merciful and devoted to Buddhism in the novel, was repeatedly hurt by the enemy on his way to the west; I don't talk about the bodhisattva heart in the story. I held a frozen snake in my arms to keep warm. As a result, it was bitten by a snake and poisoned by a farmer.
Throughout history:
Qu Yuan, the ancestor of Chu Ci, said, "I take a long breath to hide my tears and lament the hardships of the people's lives", worrying about the country and the people, and recommending talents to inspire people; But he was slandered and exiled.
Fan Zhongyan, the famous minister of reform, "put the worries of the world first, then the joy of the world", diligently loves the people, promotes the advantages and eliminates the disadvantages; However, he was repeatedly excluded and despised in a foreign land.
Yue Fei, an anti-Golden Hero, "Thirty fame, the dust settles, eight thousand miles of clouds and the moon", full of blood, for the country and the people; However, he was slandered by traitors as "an unwarranted charge"
They are all benevolent people, but there are enemies around them.
This is a foreign enemy.
Buddha said: man's greatest enemy is himself. The "people" here certainly include the "benevolent".
This is an internal enemy.
Compared with foreign enemies, internal enemies should not be underestimated.
Throughout ancient and modern times, Chinese and foreign countries, the most difficult thing for people to overcome is often themselves.
Xiang Yu, the overlord of Chu, was "powerful in pulling out mountains" and was invincible after many battles; Under the cover of the war, because of vanity can not let go of face, commit suicide by the Wujiang River.
Newton, a giant in mechanics, was once a bright star in physics. In his later years, he was stuck in the quagmire of idealism and made no achievements.
Lao She, a great literary figure, once wrote immortal works with witty remarks. However, during the Cultural Revolution, because of the literati's self-esteem, they were unwilling to be humiliated and threw themselves into the lake.
Throughout the ages, how many people with lofty ideals can overcome the harsh environment, physical pain and hardships of life; However, they often beat themselves. Facing their biggest enemy, they failed.
Foreign enemies are hard to reach, but internal enemies are stronger.
Everyone has enemies.
Benevolent people are also.
Fake benevolence is invincible. Xiang Yu is typical. He cares about his subordinates, delivers meals and packs. Too kind and kind. However, when it comes to giving titles to heroes and knights and rewarding land, he is not happy. This is hypocrisy, this is not invincible.
The real meaning of "the benevolent is invincible" is that if I treat all sentient beings with compassion, my heart will change myself, and I have no enemies in my heart. I have settled myself, so that no one in my heart will hate him and there will be no enemies. "Benevolence is invincible" means that you have no enemies, not that others are not hostile to you. It means that compassion will subdue all grievances, and there will be no enemies for a while, but I will not suffer. When you are worthy of others, you don't care how others treat you. This is liberation. It doesn't matter what others say if you can live up to your conscience.
Invincibility is understood as: first, the benevolent has great love in his heart and does not regard those so-called enemies as enemies; Second, the enemy defined by the outside world is not an enemy, but a temporary obstacle.
Hope you can win, come on ~!