Once we saw many resumes saying that they were proficient in a certain technology, architecture and so on. As a result, when it comes to the real interview, they may only have the ability to understand at most. Of course, this may be to get an interview.

But if the office software is familiar, it is almost impossible for us to know his true level from his resume. Although many computer exams now involve the knowledge of office software (mainly Word, Excel and PPT here), the way to verify the back question does not mean that he really has the operational ability after passing the exam.

There are many graduates who think they are proficient in office. They don't know how to correctly use indentation and line spacing to typeset paragraphs in Word, but use spaces and carriage returns instead, and they don't know how to use the inherent style to grade titles so as to generate a table of contents or an outline later. In Excel, I am not familiar with basic function operations, and I can't even filter data, let alone use data perspective. In PPT, you may only do simple animation, but you don't know the basic master editing at all.

They write about skillfully using office, and may only use the most basic functions very frequently, but they know little about the so-called skilled operation skills. Not all the recent graduates who are proficient in writing mentioned here are based on personal experiences in historical interviews and cannot be generalized.

So, if it's really on your resume, let him do it. A truly proficient person can know whether he is really proficient from the shortcut method and reaction he uses when opening the software.

In fact, you can know his typesetting ability by looking at his resume, which is related to the proficiency of word, or it may be an online template. )