1993 Liu Heping has published millions of words of documentary literature and essays in Southern Weekend, Beijing Youth Daily, Shenzhen Special Zone Daily, Shenzhen Legal News, Hong Kong Commercial Daily, Readers, Family, Shenzhen Youth, Companion and Golden Age. At the beginning of 2005, I was engaged in editorial writing and commentary in Hong Kong Wen Wei Po, and gained a deep understanding of China's politics, economy, society, people's livelihood and diplomacy, especially the Taiwan Strait. This is the most stringent property market regulation policy of the central government, and public opinion in Hong Kong and Taiwan is quite concerned about it. Liu Heping, a commentator on current affairs in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, summed up his incisive TV comments on mainland housing prices as follows: There are two backgrounds for this regulation. First, the macroeconomic data released the day before yesterday showed that the mainland's economic recovery momentum was very strong, reducing the pressure on the central government to hold the mouse; Second, the real estate market seems to have turned a deaf ear to the fine-tuning or even severe warning of the central government's persuasion policy in recent years. Speculation in the property market has not stopped, but has intensified. It is in this case that we see that the central government finally gritted its teeth and severely hit the hand that people love and hate about the property market. Moreover, this slap is aimed at the part and spanks directly to avoid hurting the innocent. The purpose of this policy warning is not just punishment. This policy is mainly to escalate speculation, prevent the property market from further foaming, and focus on stabilizing the market and stabilizing housing prices. If the emphasis is on punishment, property tax should be levied, which can not only prevent powerful speculators from hoarding real estate at low prices, but more importantly, drive the vacant real estate hoarded by these speculators to the market. This move will only make these real estate predators lose their blood and let house prices fall. Otherwise, just let the house price stabilize at the current level, or drop a few points symbolically after several times, and the people can only look at the house and sigh. According to the past historical experience and lessons, the possibility of increasing pressure on Big bounce cannot be ruled out. We should know that the current high property prices and the housing bubble are gradually accumulated under the background of the government's continuous regulation of the housing market. From the eighth article in 2005 to the sixth article in 2006, and then to the latest four articles and eleven articles, the central government's policy of regulating the housing market has never stopped. Therefore, we saw that after the State Council issued relevant policies yesterday, there were actually comments that this blow could only lead to a short-term callback, and this callback was the last chance for China people to take the last bus to buy a house, otherwise it would be completely out of touch with the house, which led to a problem of determination and willingness, not a problem of ability. In fact, the mainland is still a society of big government, small government and small market led by administration, which used to be aimed at other fields. In the past, the regulation of the property market was unsuccessful or counterproductive because, first, the regulation itself was not enough; Second, banks and local governments have not implemented enough for their own interests; Third, as long as the real estate market sees a little effect, special interest groups will cry and shout, and relevant policies will be withdrawn immediately. I believe that even the developers and real estate speculators who are spanked now will still stare at the government and ask, "Do you really dare to hit me? Who will support you? " . There are several practical reasons why the mainland can't make up its mind to crack down on real estate: the first is the problem of real estate kidnapping finance. At present, there are many problems in the mainland's political expense source model of supporting local finance with land sales income. This model was learned from Hong Kong, but it was invented by the British Hong Kong government at that time. Its main purpose is to plunder the wealth of Hong Kong and its people through high land prices. Even so, the British Hong Kong government dares to implement this high land price policy on the premise of solving the problem that the vast majority of Hong Kong citizens can afford housing. However, up to now, high land price is still the most serious bottleneck restricting the development of Hong Kong. There are several other more important issues. One is the concept of GDP performance. It is problematic to maintain the growth model of rapid GDP growth with the false prosperity of the real estate market, which is also the basic routine of some local officials. Another reason often mentioned is the corruption of power. Now the cost of real estate development, corruption costs account for a considerable proportion. The regulation of the mainland property market is a focus of public opinion in Hong Kong and Taiwan today. At present, China's domestic economic demand cannot be pulled up, and the investment and export-oriented economic growth model cannot be changed. High housing prices are one of the main culprits, because the real estate market in China has absorbed almost all the money of ordinary people in China; At present, in addition to the real estate phenomenon, another focus problem is unfair income distribution. In fact, the mainland real estate bubble blown by special interest groups in the mainland has brought more serious consequences than income division. In fact, real estate has achieved a great transfer of national wealth under the legal name, that is, the money of ordinary people has been further transferred to local governments and a few rich people who are mainly special interest groups. There are at least several negative social effects brought by this phenomenon: first, the polarization between the rich and the poor has further intensified and social injustice has become more prominent. Second, the social structure in China has become more unstable. High housing prices and the possible bursting of the bubble will make the newly born middle class in China sink into the bottom of society. Third, the phenomenon that most people can't afford to buy a house will naturally divide the society into two classes: the housing class and the housing-free class, which will make the housing-free class more abandoned and depressed, thus affecting social harmony. Fourth, real estate attracts people's money, and people who buy houses will reduce their quality of life after becoming house slaves. In addition, after special interest groups form a profit model in Qian Shengqian through real estate speculation, it will induce more people to be proud of speculation, which will affect the industrial development of China and mislead the development concept of a generation.