Koucai concept
Modern Chinese Dictionary defines it as: the ability of nouns to speak. What is a person's eloquence? What's the matter? What's the order? What's the significance? How do you feel? The same characteristics.
Some scholars define eloquence more clearly: in the process of oral communication, the expressive subject uses accurate, appropriate, vivid, ingenious and effective oral expression strategies to achieve specific communication purposes and satisfactory communication results? At present, based on high-speed modern life, eloquence plays a more important role than literary talent to a certain extent, which is more in line with the pace of life in today's society and is paid more and more attention by people.
China's famous orator? The Pioneer of New China Speech? Shao Shouyi, the first professor of public speaking in China, famously said: But talents are not necessarily eloquent, and eloquence must be talents. ? What is a person's eloquence? What's the matter? What's the order? What's the significance? How do you feel? The same characteristics. Some scholars define eloquence more clearly: in the process of oral communication, the expressive subject uses accurate, appropriate, vivid, ingenious and effective oral expression strategies to achieve specific communication purposes and satisfactory communication results?
Literary talent view
(1) Because of the cultural background and the ability to apply it to the extreme.
(2) the ability to write poetry.
Free defense (to be determined, now available)
one
As the saying goes, jiaozi cooks in a teapot, but the goods can't be poured out. No amount of literary talent can be expressed without eloquence. So eloquence is more important!
Obviously, the mouth is in front and the pen is in the back;
There are many scholars arguing, and there are many talents in Wu Dong. A few words have actually achieved two-thirds of the works;
There's a lot of talk, and what's even more frightening is that. Without eloquence, no amount of literary talent can be displayed. What's the use of having so much literary talent?
Why has it always been said that showing communication skills is the key to success, which is closely related to one's eloquence? May I ask other debaters, in those formal debates, did they write with a pen or speak with their mouths? Isn't that what eloquence does? Without eloquence, what debate is there?
People who have eloquence must have literary talent, and those who have literary talent may not have good eloquence. Literary talent is one of the basic skills of eloquence, and eloquence is the most direct and fastest response to literary talent. Therefore, eloquence must be better than simple literary talent, and it also reflects a person's ability to control language and comprehensive quality. Eloquence is of course more important.
Some people can talk about everything without literary talent! ! Can you say he has no eloquence? Please note that eloquence is not for pure debate, nor for winning debate. Eloquence is to make people understand your views, ideas and requirements and accept your new ideas. Instead of full of flowery rhetoric, flashy and obscure!
two
The communication attribute of eloquence is that people directly act on others.
Literary talent refers to people writing poems in order to convey their views and feelings and give full play to their written expression ability. Therefore, the communication attribute of literary talent is that people act on things and then on people.
In terms of communication attributes, eloquence is more concise and effective. Eloquence is an important part of communication in the information society. Excellent eloquence can make communication more efficient, promote the further improvement of social division of labor and cooperation, and thus promote social development.
1. The connection of modern society is getting closer and closer, and social relations tend to be complicated, which requires more and more active communication between people (including face-to-face and telephone calls, etc.). ), and eloquence is more timely than literary talent, and it can respond reasonably according to the changing reality, show its own characteristics more intuitively, and stand on the society more effectively. Just like when we encounter a critical matter, no matter whether it is a meeting or a telephone discussion, no one will send an email.
2. Eloquence is more effective than literary talent in language communication, including the use of tone and reasonable pause in speech, and it is more infectious and effective in application than literary talent.
Thirdly, a person who can write must have ink in his stomach, while a person who can talk must have good expressive ability besides ink in his stomach. For example, writing a speech is not necessarily good for a speaker. A real speaker should be good at not only writing, but also making speeches. He should have both literary talent and eloquence, but in a sense, eloquence is more important than literary talent. If the speaker mumbles and drags his feet, is this? That? A long list, then, even with extraordinary wisdom and profound and extensive ideological content, it will not help.
A person expresses what he thinks, and what he says is a strong logical performance. However, a person with literary talent may not be eloquent. If so, even if he has the best plan in mind, it is sometimes futile to express it, especially at the negotiating table.
To sum up, we think eloquence is more important than literary talent! ! !
summary
At present, in human social life, the relationship between people and between people and society is very close, so social communication is also indispensable. With more and more opportunities for people to cooperate with each other, eloquence has become a decisive factor in one's life and career. By what a person says every day, we can judge his daily work and life, his daily joys and sorrows.
There are many people who have failed in eloquence all their lives, and what we say in contact with others is easy to be taken seriously. (Think of an example)
Good eloquence and fluency will make people entrusted with important tasks. Fluent speakers are very popular. He can make many strangers join hands and let many people who are not interested in each other know each other. He can help people solve disputes and bridge the gap between people. It can cure other people's worries and sorrows and make everyone live better and happier.
Human life has reached the point where it is impossible to live alone, and the role of language is even more indispensable. No matter what environment you are in, you can't avoid interacting with people, so you have to rely on words as a medium of communication.
What is the most lacking in the world? Genius.
What do talents need? Eloquence.
In today's society, the competition between people is the competition of comprehensive quality. With good eloquence, you have a starting point for success. If not, how can the positive party pass the primary debate? Being able to write and speak is the biggest failure of English education in China. Not being able to talk is just a waste. What can be written may not be said, such as Han Feizi; What can be said may not be written, and many people who eat by mouth may not be able to write. Those who can write and speak, such as journalists and speakers, are not necessarily excellent in literary talent. Eloquence is mostly practiced. Where you need to speak, you need eloquence. As long as you need a pen to write, you need literary talent.
Are there many people who need to talk or write?
Do you have more opportunities to speak or write?
Figuratively speaking, is it? Eloquence? Or? Literary talent? In fact, they all reflect a kind of expression ability. In this society, the demand for us is growing. Blurt out? For example, Li Yang promoted it? Crazy English? Can be counted as one.
Generally speaking, people with good eloquence are not bad at literary talent, so? Good eloquence? You can ask, "If you are a talented stutterer, what are your chances of winning?" ? People's first impression of you is that people who are good at your appearance and your eloquence will have great advantages in this respect. People who are good at eloquence are not bad at literary talent, while those who are good at literary talent are not necessarily good at eloquence. For example, history is the embodiment of literature. Only when it is recorded can it be spread. And what you said is your weakness! Don't say anything, okay? Are we debating? In that case, it will be very bad for you! What eloquence does the debate rely on? It is nothing more than scholars and literary talents, and it is more about recording and describing events.
Chairman Mao said: "Society is a big dye vat! And "Wan Li Road is not as good as studying in thousands of books"! ? Eloquence? It's a talking language. Literary talent? This is a silent language. Nowadays, people's communication is interactive, and good eloquence can easily arouse others' resonance or be more convincing. No matter how high the literary talent is, it will only be buried, but people who have suffered from eloquence are different. They will always be the focus of the group and attract more envious eyes. Which is more important, literary talent or eloquence? There is no doubt that it is the latter.
Koucai story
Eloquence is not born, it is trained hard. Throughout the ages, whoever has a good eloquence is no worse than others. Otherwise, how can you make a poem in seven steps and export it? Besides, Confucius traveled around the world in ancient times, and now there is Zhou Enlai's great diplomacy and Martin Luther King's liberation of slaves. Have they been speakers since childhood? Do they have to be gorgeous and literary?
All eloquent orators and orators in ancient and modern Chinese and foreign history have achieved success by hard training.
In order to practice eloquence, American President Lincoln walked 30 miles to a court to listen to lawyers' arguments and see how they argued and made gestures. He listened and imitated them. He heard evangelists from afar waving their arms and trembling in the sky, and he also learned from them when he came back. He used to practice eloquence against trees, stumps and rows of corn.
Japanese Prime Minister tanaka kakuei suffered from stuttering as a teenager, but he was not intimidated by difficulties. In order to overcome stuttering and practice eloquence, he often recites and reads the text slowly. In order to pronounce correctly, he corrected his mouth and tongue root in front of the mirror, carefully and carefully.
Eloquent words
1. If one day mysterious providence takes away all my talents and abilities from here and only leaves me the opportunity to choose one of them to keep, I will not hesitate to ask for my eloquence so that I can recover the rest quickly. Daniel Webber? sterilizer
If one day mysterious providence takes all my talents and abilities away from here and gives me a chance to keep them, I will not hesitate to ask to leave my eloquence, so that I can quickly recover the rest.
2. Convenient mouth will make you eloquent and have the upper hand. ? Inscriptions carved on Egyptian tombs 3000 years ago
A convenient mouth will make your eloquence prevail.
3. One person's argument is more important than Jiuding's treasure; A glib tongue is better than a million teachers.
-Liu Xie's Wen Xin Diao Long? In "
4. A word can prosper the country, but a word can ruin the country. Ancient proverbs in China
If I go back to college, I will take two courses: speech and persuasion. ? Nixon
If I go back to college, I will have two classes: speech and conversation.
6. Speaking has a lot to do with career progress, which is the main embodiment of a person's strength. ? Franklin
Speaking has a lot to do with career progress and is one of the main manifestations of strength.
7. Our best thoughts and deepest feelings can only be expressed in the most beautiful language. If you can't express it, who knows how good your thoughts and feelings are? This is an inseparable and unified thing. -Lao She
8.
9. In peacetime, eloquence is more powerful than nuclear weapons.
In peacetime, eloquence is more powerful than nuclear weapons.
10. Eloquence is a social and career need. A person who can't speak is undoubtedly a loser. ? Lincoln
Eloquence is the need of society and career. A person who can't speak is undoubtedly a loser.
Eloquence is more important than literary talent. Ask questions.
1、? Can you tell a person's virtue and stupidity in one sentence? If we talk at any time, the article is not written at any time; Articles need careful consideration, but eloquence is still the art of blurting out. Which can better highlight a person's literary background?
Lawyers are a good example. If you write well, how can you win each other's interests for yourself?
It is true that lawyers have to write draft defense, but in court, they are more improvising. Which lawyer only reads the draft when defending?
3, the head of state negotiations, eloquence represents the strength of a country, but others will not appreciate your literary talent.
4. Good eloquence requires good literary talent; But having good literary talent does not necessarily mean having good eloquence. Only with good eloquence can you show good literary talent. Without good eloquence, no one can understand your literary talent. Good eloquence is essential in real life.
5. Wang Xifeng in a dream of red mansions, she has no culture. She was brought up as a boy, but she has a big mouth and excellent eloquence. Lin Daiyu is brilliant, but can she make witty remarks and handle things well in the house?
6. A person with literary talent may not be able to speak, but a person who can speak must be a person with literary talent.
7. Literary talent and eloquence are two different ways of reflecting human thinking, and there is no premise and basis for who is who. Their common foundation should be thought and wisdom. A person without thought and wisdom, even if he has the best literary talent, only writes romantic affairs and moans without illness. On the contrary, a person with profound thoughts and extensive reading can hit the nail on the head with his few words even if he has no literary talent. Therefore, literary talent has never been the basis of eloquence. They are interrelated, but this relationship is not mutually established.
8. It is words, sounds, pictures and images that record history, not just literary talent. Literary talent is not the most important criterion to judge excellent historical classics, but the most important thing to record history is truth. Before writing, dictation was also a historical inheritance. With writing, literary talent is just icing on the cake for historical classics. It is not literary talent that inherits history with words!
Excellent books are the wealth of mankind, but the reason why they are passed down by later generations is not because of their brilliant literary talent, but because of their profound thoughts. Secondly, how do we know about these books?
In fact, the inheritance of history should be the result of the joint action of eloquence and literary talent, which complement each other and are indispensable. Therefore, we cannot unilaterally expand the role of literary talent and narrow the role of eloquence. Secondly, pure historical records are not equal to literary talent, and words are just a carrier.
9. Fu Lei's letters and Zeng Guofan's letters are respected because they contain good ideas; But that doesn't mean their expression is necessarily good. If you don't believe me, let every parent buy a family book for their children to read, and the children will naturally understand? Not necessarily. Besides, even Fu Lei and Zeng Guofan wrote such good letters from home, didn't their children become immortals?
10. Selling a copy is only equivalent to an outline. Imagine what would happen if the salesperson only read or recited the copy when facing the potential buyer?
Literary talent has never been the basis of eloquence. If you want words to have content, you need to have thought and experience, not necessarily culture. The two are interrelated, but this relationship is not mutually established. There are also examples of poor literary talent but outstanding eloquence in history, such as Li, who is secretive? I don't read much, and my articles are not good. I often read white characters, but I talk nonsense when I meet people, and I finally got the position of prime minister. As for SMS and QQ, I think that's confusing the concept of literary talent. Not all words are literary talent. In fact, SMS and QQ are just an expression of our oral communication, which is the embodiment of eloquence. If all words in black and white are literary grace, then Quotations from Chairman Mao does not reflect the literary grace of Chairman Mao's old man's house, does it?
Questions to refute:
1. In the debate, if the debater has no excellent literary talent, how can he think carefully before speaking and overwhelm the other side with reasonable and logical facts?
4. Where does the saying that disaster comes from the mouth come from? Just talking too much will eventually get you into trouble. No matter how good your eloquence is, no matter how smart a person is, he will lose something if he is careful, and he will lose something if he lacks literary talent and only pays attention to eloquence.
Anyone who has made a speech knows that the first time a person gives a speech, he must first write a good manuscript and then be taken to the speech, so obviously, which is more important, eloquence or literary talent? Without good literary talent, you can't give play to your eloquence at all.
6. Eloquence emphasizes the ability to improvise, while literary talent emphasizes the ability to be practical and prepared. How can there be so many unexpected situations in real life? There is no luck in success, and opportunistic people will only run counter to success.
7. This argument itself is a bit confusing, and it is easy to argue about literary talent as literary talent. You should know that literary talent is not literary talent, and both literary talent and eloquence need literary talent as the foundation. You must make clear the definitions of these three words. If you don't get the correct definition, you will be caught by the other side in the debate, and it will be very difficult to keep biting the other side's debate. On the contrary, if the other party is not clear, it can also be used to fight back.
8. Excuse me, if eloquence is more important than literary talent, do you mainly test eloquence or literary talent every semester?
Excuse me, if eloquence is more important than literary talent, do you dare to throw away your manuscript in this debate and argue with us with eloquence?
10. May I ask your opponent, don't you need to accumulate literary talent and materials to participate in the debate this time? Dare you argue with us with your eloquence?
1 1. If eloquence is more important than literary talent, why doesn't the Ministry of Education require every school to pay attention to cultivating students' eloquence?
12. Excuse me, if eloquence is more important than literary talent, why should China implement nine-year compulsory education? This shows that all countries attach importance to literary talent, so literary talent is more important than eloquence, isn't it?
13. I would like to ask another debater, if there is no accumulation of literary talent, how can your eloquence be exerted? How can you make it clear? How can you convince people? How to get respect from others?
14. Literary talent is very important. As the saying goes:? Very talented? , there is no good ideological realm and good psychological cultivation and cultural level. Light? Eloquence? Maybe just one? Eloquence? Topic: Doesn't the other debater just want to be an A? Eloquence?
15. Literary talent is internal, and eloquence is expression. Without literary talent as the basis, only eloquence, how can you express your thoughts?
16. When you apply for an interview, does the employer read your resume or listen to your speech first? I'm telling you, if you don't have a resume as a stepping stone, you won't even have an interview.
17. Excuse me, another debater, dumb people can't talk, right? If eloquence is more important than literary talent, are people like them useless? If you were a fool or a mute, which would you choose?
18. May I ask another debater, how many scholars have left magnificent chapters since ancient times, and how many have succeeded by speaking with one mouth?
19. Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory and Jiang Zemin? Theory of Three Represents theory? The thoughts of these three generations of countries promote social development. These are all expressions of literary talent, so they are great men. I would like to ask other debaters, who can become a great man by eloquence?
20. You always say that good eloquence can play an important role in sales, socializing, speaking and debating. So, is it more important to work in the press and publishing industry, secretarial industry, writing field, literature field and academic field? , literary talent or eloquence? Can you compile China and the four classical novels with your mouth?
2 1. Has the opposing debater heard of it? A gentleman should not discuss other people's faults, neither eating nor sleeping. There is also a saying in Buddhist language: misfortune comes from the mouth, and silence is Kim's famous saying, right? This is the limit of eloquence, opponent.
22. Blogging, watering online forums and writing online novels are popular in society now. If literary talent is not important, how to write it? How can we keep up with the trend of the times?
23. From the long-term perspective of cultural inheritance and social development, literary talent is more effective and persuasive than eloquence. Can the other debater ask a person to convince others with his eloquence and give a speech for 10 thousand years?
24. May I ask another debater, why did great men like Marx and Engels write books instead of making thousands or tens of thousands of speeches in order to spread their ideas to every corner of the world?
25. If eloquence is more important than literary talent, do you have to travel around the world and learn every language in the world before you can teach your ideas to others?
26. At the large-scale job fairs in recent years, many people introduced themselves eloquently, but when asked about his professional knowledge, he was immediately speechless. He handed in a test paper, but he couldn't write it. Can the opposing debater say that eloquence is more important than literary talent?
27. The importance of a thing lies in its value, and judging its value lies in its influence. If the other party quotes Lu Xun and Hu Shi, influential people who rely on pens to eat or influential books (from the perspective of influential authors, the other party will definitely say that if there is no literary talent, how can these people's great ideas and talents spread out)? How to cut in from the influence of eloquence?