Poet Zheng Zhengxi 1
Recently, online poetry collections have attracted more attention because of poetry counterfeiting. Although 99% people support and applaud, there are still very few people who are skeptical, disgusted or opposed. Online poetry selection is a public platform, and there are many editorial departments, but after all, the directional operation is my own. To this end, I would like to make a personal statement on the current online poetry selection:
1, the online poetry selection received everyone's report, and carefully analyzed the materials to confirm that the plagiarism was not made out of nothing, and there was no personal entanglement or conflict of interest with anyone. The purpose of counterfeiting is to protect the rights and interests of all poets' works, not to protect online poetry selection and my personal interests.
2. There are too many cases of poetry plagiarism, and it is impossible to crack down on fraud by grasping a beard and eyebrows. Select typical cases from the materials reported by everyone and publish them. The principles are: large-scale plagiarists, consistent plagiarists, provincial writers' associations, members or officials of Chinese writers' associations, poetry "stars" or celebrities, those who profit from plagiarized works, and those who do not admit their insincere mistakes. Apart from the above, I won't criticize.
3. Whether to crack down on poetry plagiarism is just like whether to crack down on plagiarism and punish thieves. You don't need to ask anyone's opinion. You will write articles to attack, criticize or slander, and you will not shrink back and move because of your interruption. Everyone is welcome to make comments on the online poetry selection, but we are not allowed to engage in poetry counterfeiting. No one will listen to this opinion, not a word. I would rather close the online poetry selection, and the fake poetry will be beaten!
4. Poetry counterfeiting, the number of onlookers is more than the number of onlookers, indicating that plagiarism is unpopular and will cause public outrage, which is too normal. Those with ulterior motives should not always use the participation of counterfeiters as an excuse to attack what we call "going too far." If you catch a thief, you don't have to take part in the accusation, but you shouldn't use a magnifying glass to find fault with the thief, saying that the voice of reprimanding the thief is too loud, the gesture of reprimanding is not beautiful, why not give the thief a drink, and so on. We only have two points, one is whether the evidence of plagiarism is valid, and the other is that we can't lead the angry reprimand of plagiarism to personal attacks.
5, some people say, don't force the follower to commit suicide, don't make a murder case. This is a big joke. We expose plagiarism according to the facts in the article, and ask him to return the stolen works to their original owners according to moral standards, and ask him to admit his mistakes, apologize, and promise to wash his hands of it according to the principle of saving lives. If these constitute "homicide", I am personally willing to bear legal responsibility. Some plagiarists were in high spirits before the incident, and immediately "entered the hospital" after exposure, and even threatened to commit suicide. That's ridiculous! Well, I don't want to use my brain in the future, but I also want to make a name and profit, specializing in copying and assembling other people's works. I can buy a pack of sleeping pills first, show them online, and attach the words: whoever wants to copy with me, I will take them orally!
6. Since there is no room for discussion on anti-plagiarism in online poetry selection, if you have different views on this, you are welcome to quit freely. I will take responsibility for the consequences caused by anti-plagiarism, which has nothing to do with anyone.
Poet Zheng Zhengxi 2
Anyone who has met Mr. Zheng Zhengxi will probably agree with me. He is so different from the founder of Sina blog, an online poetry collection. At first glance, he is so modest, low-key, thoughtful and concise. In his blog, he was sharp-edged and unreasonable, which offended many people and made many people hate him. He cursed and scolded him, but he was helpless.
Including me, I had a little misunderstanding with him. A few years ago, because of something (or someone? He blacklisted me and listed me with a group of "black friends" in a blog post. After about half a year, we made up our differences. The process of our reconciliation showed me his generosity. At the same time, I admire his selfless contribution to poetry. In spite of this, I still have a lingering fear, and I have learned to be good since then, and I will no longer express any opinions to him. How to express it? Maybe, more or less, it smells like staying at a respectful distance from others.
Besides, some of my friends hate him and some hate him. So I usually don't talk to my friends about online poetry collections.
Until last year. In a telephone conversation, I learned that Mr. Zheng Zhengxi's pension was basically spent on poetry except for his daily expenses. Not for myself, but for others. Payment for writing, publishing books and rewarding poets. I remember being surprised. I advised him not to do that. I said, those things can't be done without sponsorship. He said, I don't smoke or drink, I see a doctor at public expense, and I don't need to rely on my children to stand on their own feet. I want to take out my extra money and do something useful.
Then he got sick. Because I sit in front of the computer for more than ten hours every day, there is something wrong with my cervical spine. I advised him not to work so hard. Besides, there are many baiwenhang now. Who are you working for? I don't know if I said the last sentence. But I clearly remember that there was a time when I hated the baiwenhang.
I didn't really understand until today: in fact, he is not for anyone, but for something.
In the closing speech of the first online poetry selection youth poetry club, he expressed the purpose of the meeting like this: to get everyone together and discuss the "national affairs" of poetry, because usually everyone pays more attention to their own poetry. He doesn't talk much, and he is neither humble nor supercilious. He said that the participants we invited must meet two conditions: first, they are all powerful poets; Second, they are all clean people. If you don't have these two things, you are not qualified to attend our poetry meeting. Our invitation is not to see who is famous, so as to promote online poetry selection through "being rich". Online poetry selection does not need such publicity.
Perhaps because of adhering to such principles and concepts, this activity gave me a very comfortable feeling. I come from Shan Ye, and I instinctively avoid busy places. But these days, my maladjustment was completely appeased, and it fell asleep comfortably.
During the activity, I was as surprised and admired as other poets when I learned that Mr. Zheng Zhengxi was 75 years old. I thought he was under 60. Who would have thought that an old man over the age of ancient times could still fight against literary corruption with such energy and high morale, and volunteer for poetry year after year without regrets? Ah, not a poetry volunteer. A volunteer usually pays only time and energy, and he also pays a pension.
Yesterday, an image came to my mind and I couldn't get rid of it. Strong teeth in an aging mouth.
Yes, that's him. Mr. Zheng Zhengxi. The guardian and martyr of poetry. Teacher Zheng.
I want to call him Mr. Zheng.
He deserves it.