First, Wu Fatian's lawyer level is really high, but old Rong Zhi's evidence is conclusive.
Lawyer Wu Danhong (net name Wu Fatian) has a strong resume. Master of Central South University of Political Science and Law, Ph.D. of Renmin University of China Law School, and postdoctoral fellow of Peking University Law School. In judicial practice, his resume did not play a role, but his strength did. Lu's intentional injury case was tried for 9 years. As Lu's defense lawyer, he sent the case back for retrial from two aspects: "evidence" and "procedure", and the second trial was innocent.
There are several such cases in lawyer Wu Danhong's resume. He is the director of the Difficult Evidence Center of China University of Political Science and Law. Grasping and questioning evidence is his specialty. Therefore, when he defends Rong Zhi Sr, he will start with the chain of evidence. Even if it is not, it will start with the program.
Some people think that Wu Danhong's lawyer is likely to change the case or send it back for retrial. If sent back for retrial, there may be a phenomenon of changing the sentence. Undeniably, Wu Danhong's lawyer has a high professional quality, and his mastery of evidence is an important way to promote the judicial development in China. However, the case of Old Rong Zhi is different from other cases. Old Rong Zhi and France and Britain are accomplices.
When old Rong Zhi was explaining the facts, he said that he was out and had an alibi. In the words of the staff of the procuratorate, less than once, less than twice, so many times? Do you really think of yourself as "silly and sweet"? Judging from the criminal evidence chain, Old Rong Zhi and Faziying are accomplices, not coerced as Old Rong Zhi said.
She explained that if she left, she would hurt her family. How pale this reason is, I have followed the method for so long. When Franco-British learned that old Rong Zhi had left, he smiled. This shows that the relationship between two people is very good. Since the feelings are so good, why is there a saying of hurting her family? This is obviously a cover-up.
Second, the key evidence has been confirmed clearly.
Lawyer Wu Danhong's strength lies in the details of the evidence chain and the rigor of the trial procedure. As long as there is a little omission, let him catch it, and he may overturn the previous trial conclusion. In court, the two sides launched a "confrontation" on the details of the case of Old Rong Zhi. Old Rong Zhi thinks that France and Britain did these things, and she didn't participate. Death tells no tales, and English teaching method is out of date.
Some people say that since old Rong Zhi has no evidence to prove it, her suspicion is great. Others said that since the procuratorate believed that Rong Zhi Sr did it, it should submit corresponding evidence to prove that she was a direct participant. If not, it means that old Rong Zhi is innocent, because we practice the principle of "no doubt". Many victims' families are reluctant to mention this matter again, which makes the case more difficult.
Even so, the procuratorate found some parties and made a record. From the transcript, it is found that old Rong Zhi and Faziying have a good relationship and a tacit understanding, and they can know what to do without talking. From this perspective, Rong Zhi Sr. was not coerced, but actively involved in this matter. There is nothing wrong with old Rong Zhi's evidence, and the rest is to discuss whether there are flaws in the judicial process.
During the trial, no drastic measures were taken against old Rong Zhi, and there was no phenomenon of beating and cursing. Only in accordance with legal procedures will it be recorded. Procedurally, it meets the legal requirements. Lawyers and prosecutors in Wu Danhong have discussed these aspects, which are very professional, but we can't understand them. What we can know is that the old Rong Zhi case will be decided on another day.
Third, in the case of old Rong Zhi, public opinion tends to the death penalty. If Wu Fatian wants to fight back, it is unlikely.
Many people think that public opinion cannot be violated. Teacher Luo Xiang once said that the death penalty for defendants is to respect their human rights and let them stand in court with dignity. Wu Danhong, a lawyer, can stand in court to defend old Rong Zhi, but also to safeguard the dignity of the law. Some people think that they have all been sentenced to death. Why should they defend themselves? Respect for the law is also respect for human feelings.
Law is nothing more than human feelings, which is our simple concept. What we need to face is everyone. Before the legal judgment, they were citizens and criminal suspects. Old Rong Zhi was sentenced to death at first instance. She appealed, showing respect for the law. Lawyer Wu Danhong is willing to defend him, which is also a sign of respect for the law. Many people hope that old Rong Zhi will be sentenced to death, which is public opinion.
Can public opinion replace law? I can't. Without evidence, the suspect will be acquitted. With evidence and universally recognized evidence, it is difficult to change the sentence again. Everyone thinks that old Rong Zhi and France and Britain did badly. The bad guys are at large, which makes a mockery of kindness. Therefore, Rong Zhi Sr should be sentenced to death.
Some people say that Simpson's verdict on killing his wife is contrary to public opinion. Indeed, this is in the absence of evidence, or the chain of evidence is inaccurate. The situation of old Rong Zhi is different from that of Simpson. Therefore, the case of Rong Zhi Sr is unlikely to be changed. What do you think of this? Welcome everyone to leave a message!