First, it is not necessary to use the first place in open selection.
In the Interim Provisions on the Open Selection of Leading Cadres of the Party and Government, there are clear provisions on the open selection of leading cadres, but there is no provision on which ranking person must be used, except for the provision in Article 25 that "the candidate is determined from high score to low score according to the comprehensive examination results".
Therefore, you have no reason to refute their decision. Even if you get the first place ten times, you don't have to use your reasons.
Second, the written interview results are not the only condition.
There is no provision in the "Regulations" for hiring cadres according to the comprehensive results of written interview. Moreover, after the results came out, two procedures were set up: organizing inspection and deciding appointment. In the process of organizing the inspection, we will conduct a comprehensive inspection on the individual's ability, work level and moral standard, and finally put forward the candidates to be hired according to the degree of job matching. After choosing a reference, you can decide which one to appoint.
Therefore, the written interview results are only necessary conditions, not sufficient conditions. Even to some extent, it is not an important condition.
Third, I suggest you take an examination of senior positions.
I personally think that the more you go to the grassroots level, the worse the fairness and credibility of open selection. If you have a high level, I suggest you take the central and provincial exams, not the lower levels. After all, the higher the level, the less contacts. A small county is related to each other. How can open selection not involve relationships, care and the like?
Fourth, report the problem
What you did was so childish. If I am the head of the organization department, I can't use you any more because of you. An impulsive person can't be a leading cadre.
About Zhao Yang, you are confronting the organization head-on. Even if Zhao Yang loses the election, you won't have another chance in this world. There are usually two ways: one is to keep silent. Even if you have grievances, you can't let the organization think that you are dissatisfied with the organization. Once the organization feels your dissatisfaction, you are finished in the eyes of the organization. The second is to report to the superior. Report directly to the Organization Department of the Provincial Party Committee and the Central Organization Department, which is easy to be taken seriously. If people deal with Zhao Yang clearly, you still have no chance.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) abstract
Don't question the behavior of the organization at any time and place, especially in a formal and open way. Otherwise, you have violated the authority of the organization, which is an important taboo.
Is it possible that people who have broken taboos still want to be reused?
If someone touches the most painful point in your heart, will you forgive others? At least, your heart is still bumpy, right?