I can't figure it out. It's just a suspected melon of Douban. Even the original text of that post, many people haven't read it, and they don't know Chen Ming. Now they nail him to the shame column. To provoke a sensitive point of the masses, we can either blow up a piece or wait and see and vent everywhere.
Others pointed to the partiality of Chen Ming's father-in-law, and the academic problems of his wife and brother-in-law. Now why not clarify yourself and go after the informer? I think there may be a real problem. Many people asked Chen Ming to prove his innocence, or were disappointed that he failed to prove his innocence. It's really puzzling. Who asks questions and who gives evidence? Nobody understands such a simple truth? Lenovo PINKRAY in the previous paragraph, now the cost of some things is really too low!
The whistleblower didn't produce exact evidence, but he presented the whole background of Chen's wife and brother-in-law. People who eat melons can find evidence based on these. As a member of the system, Chen certainly has the obligation to prove his innocence. People who eat melons don't have to let him prove his innocence, but they are qualified to ask him about his irregular behavior. If you think this is forcing him to prove his innocence, think so. People who eat melons shouldn't have clung to Zhai Tianlin in the first place. Don't tell the Commission for Discipline Inspection that President Wang is in cahoots now. After all, he is not qualified for President Wang to prove his innocence. He is an incorruptible headmaster!
But the question is whether the paper on the desk does not meet the requirements of doctoral graduation. Does this need no explanation? There is really no need for Mr. Chen Ming to prove himself to netizens (the disciplinary inspection has already achieved results), but netizens' doubts about degree-related issues are also based on the fact that the papers published by Mr. Chen are different from the graduation requirements of Wuhan University (of course, it is also possible to realize that the problems are not Wuhan University after all), which is also related to many college students. I don't know how it became selfish.
My biggest concern is who is suing? Who listed the charges?
In the past, when the two armies confronted each other, they all paid attention to a common name and played a fair game. What do you mean, stab in the back? Even if, I mean, even if all these so-called lesbian theories are true, I just don't want to read a word. Why? Because I can't trust a sinister villain hiding in the dark and stabbing. The evidence of your hammer is conclusive, and it is not shameful for you to stand up.
Just say that Fang, no matter how disgusting, is also a fair confrontation. Evidence in hand, justice in the heart, justice in the world. No matter how hard his relationship with the Chen family is, there is a commission for discipline inspection to support you. What are you afraid of? So I can only think that this is a false accusation, and I don't want to read any of them, let alone believe them.
As for Chen Ming's qualification thesis, in fact, neither C journal is applicable. When Chen Ming graduated, Dr. Wu Da's qualification thesis was not C-journal, and the standard of C-journal was changed from doctoral students enrolled in 20 13. The core catalogue of doctoral dissertations before grade 20 12 is really wide, which is more than that of Peking University on the whole and has lower requirements.
In addition, the core catalogue of qualification papers is mainly based on the year of admission, but both transfer-in and transfer-out are valid during the study period, that is to say, it is not necessary to see whether it is the core when it is issued, as long as it was published during his whole study period, then it is counted. Therefore, Chen Ming's qualification thesis should be qualified. Let's take a look at the enrollment and further studies of him and his wife and brother.
It's hard to say. According to the Internet, these report materials were available several months ago. Why are they all hot searching now? Nobody knows what the specific purpose is. Regarding the indications of academic fraud, let the whistleblower and the whistleblower play a game. Report if you want, and report if you want. We know nothing about Wu Da. Wu da doesn't know how to react to the falsification of academic qualifications. However, judging from the current information on the Internet, the inbreeding of Wu Da is a bit serious. ?
In fact, as early as a few years ago, domestic universities began to pay attention to this. I didn't expect to be a little surprised when I was in Wuhan University. I used to think that Wu Da was still a good school. In fact, the focus of the whole thing is that Chen Ming's husband-in-law used power for personal gain, because the reporter used Chen Ming as a banner to attract the attention of the spectators, and Chen Ming directly used his crooked hand to ignite the fire. As for the investigation by the Commission for Discipline Inspection, hehe, unless the Central Leading Group for Inspection Work directly investigates, the provinces and cities will inevitably be affected by the family network.
Looking at a series of illegal operations in the news, there are cross-provincial situations, and there must be an exchange of interests between several provinces. For example, a provincial leader solves the education problem of a provincial leader's son, while a provincial leader helps solve the work problem of a provincial leader's daughter and exchanges interests with each other. Chen Ming has other questions. The college entrance examination was also admitted to 985 Wuhan University. What is attacked is nothing more than the conditions for postgraduate entrance examination and doctoral graduation. These can be clearly explained by various special policies for further studies (the scientific research policies of universities are different in different periods, and ordinary students simply can't figure it out, so they can't attack Chen Ming with evidence. Most doctoral students enter and graduate by tutors, and it is more difficult for ordinary people to find strong evidence to kill them. However, it is even more doubtful that Chen Ming's wife continued to be an undergraduate teacher without publishing a decent paper.
Chen Ming is at least the boss of the debate association, and it is understandable that the school guarantees that he is qualified for research. The main problem is his wife. The undergraduate stays in school to teach. If I were you, I would report her in another way. I think Mrs. Chen's family must hate Chen Ming. If it weren't for her, things would have been solved long ago. It's so big now, let's see how it ends.
First of all, Article 55 of the Personal Rights Law in the Civil Law stipulates: "In the public interest, the privacy of public figures can be made public and supervised by public opinion." As public figures, Chen Ming and Tan Huizai are retired officials, and the public has the right to supervise them. Secondly, Chen Ming said that someone reported it and the Commission for Discipline Inspection had the results of the investigation. Therefore, in view of the academic injustice questioned by the public, especially the back door problem of his wife's house, it is necessary for him to disclose the results of the investigation in detail, otherwise it will inevitably damage his influence as a public figure.
Finally, the incident of academic injustice does not belong to entertainment, which is related to educational fairness and political integrity, and can not be joked. In fact, in recent years, there have been endless incidents of impersonation and academic fraud, all driven by public opinion, revealing part of the truth, punishing those who break the law, and replacing learning with officials!