Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - What is the reason for the second trial of Nanjing female college students' murder case, which was not pronounced in court?
What is the reason for the second trial of Nanjing female college students' murder case, which was not pronounced in court?
The second instance of the Intermediate People's Court of Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture was not pronounced in court. Qiao Hong, the principal offender, claimed that he was innocent and mentally ill, and the court rejected the request for psychiatric appraisal. What is the reason for the second trial of Nanjing female college students' murder case, which was not pronounced in court?

1, event content

The Menghai County Public Security Bureau of Xishuangbanna issued a notice saying that it had received an investigation report from Qixia Branch of Nanjing Public Security Bureau: Li Mouyue (female, 2 1 year old, from Baoying, Jiangsu) arrived in Menghai, Yunnan, and her whereabouts were unknown. After investigation, it was found that Li's boyfriend Hong (male, 24 years old, from Nanjing, Jiangsu) was suspected of committing a major crime. Menghai police and Nanjing police arrested three suspects in Nanjing, including Hong Mou, Zhang Moguang (male, 2 1 year old, from Suqian, Jiangsu) and Cao Mouqing (male, 20 years old, from Nanjing, Jiangsu), and found Li Mouyue's buried body in the forest outside Menghai County on the same day.

2. Why didn't the second trial be pronounced in court? What is the reason?

Let's talk about it first First of all, we must clarify a problem. Although it was held in Banna Intermediate People's Court, it was not held in Banna Intermediate People's Court, but the court of Yunnan Higher People's Court borrowed from Banna Intermediate People's Court. Routine operation, don't make a fuss. The defendants are all in Banna, so it is impossible to bring them to Kunming for trial. Why didn't it be pronounced in court? Because the attention of this case is too high, and the poor form is more likely to arouse public anger, but you can rest assured that 99% of the original judgment will be upheld in the second instance and will not be changed. The Intermediate People's Court attaches great importance to cases that are sentenced to death and executed immediately, and the undertaker will be particularly cautious, not to mention such cases with high social concern. From the undertaker, to the criminal court, to the judicial Committee in the hospital, it will be 360 degrees in all directions.

? 3. Why is there a second judgment in the judicial process?

An unfair trial even led to more than a dozen crimes. Because although crime ignores the law, it pollutes the water, and unfair trial breaks the law because it pollutes the water. Bacon? . Let's be realistic. In the case of unjust imprisonment, there is still hope for remedy. At least there is state compensation. After all, people are still here. If you catch a pat and then find yourself wronged, it will be really late. Finally, it is also a manifestation of the justice of legal procedure. As for the importance of procedural justice or outcome justice, everyone has different opinions, so I won't teach others how to teach others.

Postscript: people who despise life are dying, hoping to seize the nonexistent straws and live for a few more days. As far as the case itself is concerned, the chop suey who committed the murder case has not yet been judged, which is really not enough to calm the public's anger.