The informant is from Shenyang, and he learned about a criminal act of forging a degree certificate for a long time to defraud a foreigner's work permit from a foreign special department. The whistleblower immediately reported the case to Shenyang Public Security Bureau. The entry-exit department of Shenyang immediately filed a case against the "three non-foreigners" within its jurisdiction, and explained to reporters that forging a degree certificate was a criminal offence, and the criminal act occurred in Liaoyang and needed to be handled by the public security organs in Liaoyang.
20 19 12 the reporter went to Liaoyang from Shenyang and arrived at the south gate police station at 1 1:00. After the police on duty and the police on duty explained their intentions, they confirmed that the training institutions involved were under the jurisdiction of the institute, and asked the leaders on duty to meet the reporters in the police room in the lobby. At that time, there were three public security personnel and three colleagues who reported the case. After a brief understanding of the purpose, the director on duty said that "the Education Bureau is the competent department of training institutions. Report to the Education Bureau first. After verification by the Education Bureau, the Education Bureau will call the police. " The whistleblower said that "it is the obligation of citizens to report clues and evidence of criminal acts, and criminal problems should be handled by public security organs." The content of the report has provided a clear description of the facts of the crime, including the purpose and means of the crime, the use and destination of false information, the chain of command of the crime of forging official documents, the fact that you are a witness, what other key witnesses are, and the way to obtain key material evidence. "The director on duty continues to insist that the reporter report to the Education Bureau, and has repeatedly made it clear that this unit will not accept the case report.
The whistleblower repeatedly asked for the "report acceptance receipt", and the duty officer clearly replied "unable to provide it";
The whistleblower repeatedly suggested taking notes, and the duty officer clearly replied "no, no";
The reporter repeatedly asked the police station to accept the written report letter provided by the reporter, and the director on duty clearly replied "not accepted".
Until the reporter 1 1:30 left the south gate police station, the public security personnel didn't even ask the reporter's name, didn't remember a word, and didn't leave a piece of paper.