First of all, from the literal meaning of the notice, we can't help but have a few questions in our hearts. What kind of class is called Sheung Shui class? Are there few people in class? Or did the teacher speak badly? Or is it useless for future work? It seems that every reason has a strong subjective factor and is far-fetched.

I saw many people on the Internet bombarding the course of employment and entrepreneurship guidance. In fact, if you think about it carefully, is this course really useless? Most people can use "confusion" to describe their college time, and they don't need such courses to point out the direction for themselves. Such courses can help us to better understand the current employment situation, broaden our horizons, and see clearly our strengths and weaknesses, so as to achieve the effect of checking and filling gaps. It should be a very popular course in principle.

When we read the comments carefully, we will find that many students are dissatisfied with a group of so-called tutors who are not employed in society or even have little contact with the outside world to attend employment classes. Can they believe it?

Others say that the current situation and politics, thinking about morality and so on. I have also taken these classes, and most teachers sit on the podium and order ppt, which is basically scripted and unattractive. But is the ideological quality of college students high now? Do you have a deep understanding of the situation around the country today? The answer is undoubtedly no, and many people don't even have a sense of urgency. These courses are necessary, but how to carry them out requires teachers to innovate and can no longer rely on traditional indoctrination. It is also an ideological and political course. Why can Deep China of Huazhong University of Science and Technology become an explosive course among students? You can't even sit by the window. I still remember taking an elective course in my sophomore year. As an engineering student, I want to learn more medical knowledge, so I chose clinical pharmacy. A total of more than a dozen people chose this course, and finally canceled the course directly because there were too few people. I was angry at that time. I want to learn some common sense, but the result is not satisfactory. Ten people can open it completely. Just because everyone is rushing to take easy courses such as movie appreciation and music appreciation?

Therefore, it's not that I don't want to attend many classes, nor that I don't want to learn, but that the way and method of teachers attending classes are too uninspired. Who can't read the book? So is employment guidance. Why not invite some company bosses or successful entrepreneurs to give lectures? What we need is someone with practical foundation to tell simple empirical truth. I believe that many courses in the university have been carefully selected and set up, but for various reasons, they have not achieved the expected results and become water courses in the eyes of students. Many teachers ask students to be present by compulsory roll call, instead of thinking about how to enhance the attraction of their courses, which will always be disgusted by students.

Therefore, this must be a multi-party effort to be effective. On the one hand, schools should really streamline the curriculum. As for how to reduce it, you can do more questionnaires and listen to students' opinions. On the other hand, teachers should also change their original classroom thinking. After all, each generation has different characteristics and ideas, and it is also a big difficulty to adopt effective methods to improve curriculum efficiency.

Of course, as students, we should also improve our ideological awareness, correctly see our own shortcomings, and be modest and eager to learn. There must be someone who doesn't care, not just a class, but even their own lives. For example, some people have failed six or seven classes for several semesters, and they still look as if nothing has happened. I think this situation can refer to the practice of some colleges and universities, and those who refuse to reform after repeated education can take elimination measures. Some people feel that they are in the safe when they go to college, and there is no pressure to survive. Of course, they go their own way.

This distorted concept also urgently needs education to change, because the pressure of survival is ever-present and the competition is becoming more and more fierce, but we have not felt it in the greenhouse of the university.