Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - Liaoning bridegroom died on the wedding day, and the bride inherited 6.5438+0.83 million, which was sued by her in-laws. How did the court decide?
Liaoning bridegroom died on the wedding day, and the bride inherited 6.5438+0.83 million, which was sued by her in-laws. How did the court decide?
The wedding is the beginning of happiness, but an accident that day caused the groom to fall to his death. The groom's parents should be more upset than the bride. The court finally ruled that the bride inherited 6.5438+0.83 million yuan, and the court ruled that the bride inherited the property. This result is fair and in line with China's inheritance right. The groom's parents have no right to inherit their son's inheritance, because his son still has a spouse. Today, I want to tell you what happened. This is a game case about true emotion.

The death of the groom on the wedding day is not the saddest thing for loving couples. The saddest thing is that they separated on the wedding day. At the age of 37, the bride and groom have not been in love for a long time, but considering their age and stable relationship, they discussed marriage. The two have known each other for half a year at most, and they got married like little lovers. On this happy day, the groom fell from the roof of the bride's house and died. In an instant, this happy event turned into a funeral, and the groom accidentally fell to his death on the wedding day. Don't say that all the relatives and friends here feel incredible. The saddest thing about this is the bride. They finally came to the palace of marriage, but before they could enjoy their own world, they were separated by Yin and Yang.

The groom is an only child, and there are two old people at home. According to the truth, the bride should die happily for the two old people. After all, they have got a marriage certificate, so they are a family. Although the time is not long, it has legal effect and is protected by law. Maybe there is not much affection, but in the final analysis, it is still a family. However, after the death of the groom, the bride made up her mind on the issue of inheritance, because the groom's deposit was 654.38+0.83 million, and the groom had a house and a car under his name. My parents-in-law thought the bride's idea was too much, so they took her daughter-in-law to court.

The court finally found that the in-laws said that the evidence was insufficient, and the final judgment of the court was very reasonable, because the woman and groom were registered and protected by law, and they also had a wedding. Although the groom's death is unknown, it is still protected by law. The woman applied to the court for inheritance. The deposit in her husband's bank account is 6.5438+0.8 million, and all the property in her name are her own inheritance.

In-laws' rhetoric is weak. They think that the daughter-in-law just wants to inherit all the property of her son. This kind of behavior is very excessive, because they have known each other for a short time. As the parents of their son, they have the right to inherit this 654.38+0.83 million. 1830000 also includes in-laws' own property. Therefore, the daughter-in-law has no right to inherit her son's property, and the son's original and password are in the hands of her in-laws.

However, both the first and second trials of the court found that the in-laws were weak, and the deposits could not be owned by the in-laws. All the women won the case. The court held that the evidence provided by the in-laws could not prove that 654.38+0.83 million belonged to the in-laws. Legally speaking, although the woman has been married to the groom for only one day, she has already obtained a marriage certificate, which means that no matter whether she has been married for one day or 10 years, as long as she has obtained the certificate in the office, the legal spouse is the first heir, and the man's deposit should be given to the woman. If the in-laws are telling the truth, they should produce sufficient evidence. Any common sense and morality are vulnerable before the court, and only evidence is the most sufficient fact. According to Article 1 127 of the Civil Code, the parents of the spouse's children take precedence over the second order, and the grandparents of brothers and sisters, that is, as long as the spouse is the spouse, are the first heirs. So the court fairly ruled that the money was inherited by the bride.

Personally, I feel very sad, because after the groom's death, his closest two people are actually fighting for his property. The most important thing is the daughter-in-law whose parents-in-law never went to the door. The mother-in-law thinks that the daughter-in-law should divide the property, and the daughter-in-law does have the right to inherit this 654.38+0.83 million. Everyone is equal before the law. I think the legal judgment is fair and in line with the civil code. It is very sad that the groom died unexpectedly without leaving a will. It is also because of property problems that in-laws and daughter-in-law have great contradictions.