It is very important to determine the theme of a good article, just like the eyes of an article. The title, first of all, is innovative, can attract people's attention, or make people feel novel, thus generating the desire to read the full text. For example, on the issue of hospital red envelopes. The same content, if the topic is "after the red envelope goes bad", this topic is very common and nothing new. If it is changed to "after the red envelope is bleached", this question will make people shine and their interest will increase at once.
Critical writing should at least have a clear point of view and be meaningful. But there are often some friends who have just written, and they can't do this well. An article looks very long, but it is a punch in the east and a kick in the west, which makes people look confused and confused. Criticism is different from prose. Prose can support horses, although the form is scattered, the spirit is not scattered. However, comments must focus on the points to be expressed. And avoid contradictions in the context.
Write a good summary, you can find a point from one thing, discuss around a small point, and concentrate on annihilating a content. When writing, don't choose many points, try to cover everything, and in the end, your views are unclear, your arguments are unclear, and you are unconvincing. Since it is a comment, it should be closely related to real life. Try to comment from the social point of view, proceed from the interests of the general public, and demonstrate from the social moral level. Such comments are more likely to cause * * *. Of course, comments are definitely positive and negative, which will definitely cause controversy. For people with different views, the author should be tolerant with a broad mind.
There are various forms of comments: straight to the point, reeling, circuitous tactics, expressing praise and criticism, and so on. This is related to everyone's knowledge level, writing ability and writing habits, and it is also determined by personal preferences.
If you want to write a good review, you have to read more reviews. Lu Xun's essays are a sword. Hu Shi's essays are completely different from Lu Xun's, but they are also worth studying. Bai, a contemporary, also read his essays. What impressed me the most was Bai Yang's articles such as "disrespect" and "big slander", which were very ironic against "NPC deputies". "Laugh with tears", if the composition can reach this level, it can be described as excellent!