We have seen poor college students set up stalls on the street to work and study; We have also seen college students become popular overnight through talent shows and become stars before graduation. No one feels "idle" about their performance, and we even applaud their personal success. Then, why do female college students use the Internet platform to auction their "god skills" and cause controversy?
Based on the hot words these days, the title that excites public opinion most may be "auctioning female students for a week". Ambiguous, stimulating, grandstanding, emitting a strong "UC shock" temperament title, so that this matter has fallen into the chain of public opinion contempt from the beginning.
However, the eye-catching behavior from the media can never be a reason to belittle college students' self-display. It is irresponsible to "punish" college students with the behavior of individual media.
To say the least, it is not so unforgivable for students who are about to graduate, even if they have impetuous psychology of being eager for employment. Since 16, the total number of college graduates in China has soared from 850,000 in199 to 7.65 million in 20 16, not counting the students who graduated from vocational schools and stopped studying after graduating from junior high schools. In this situation, in the last ten years, we will see the same keyword almost every graduation season: "the hardest year for employment." Every year is the hardest. How hard are students?
If you want a horse to run, you can't let it not eat grass. Of course, we all hope that the employment problem can be alleviated through macro-control and economic growth, but on the other hand, we should not blame the efforts of college students to innovate employment methods.
Some people may say that talking about business lightly is harmful to the serious academic environment on the university campus. But from another perspective, what is the root of the current tendency of college students to despise academics and attach importance to employment? If learning means poverty, isn't it difficult to ask most people to be willing to be poor? The emergence of new platforms provides a breakthrough for changing the situation.
In recent years, the rise of the media has made the "knowledge economy" more and more powerful, and media users have become more and more deeply touched: "Knowledge has never been so valuable". In this so-called "auction of female college students" incident, the online platform only served as an endorsement of knowledge again. College students only "sell themselves" to the society through new means, which is more active than submitting resumes at the double election meeting and more "counterpart" than asking relatives and friends to introduce their work. Not only should it not be underestimated, but it should be encouraged and necessary.
College students are the cornerstone of the future development of society. It is undeniable that as high-end talents, they should have a cultural consciousness of "aristocratic spirit" to themselves. However, this does not mean that universities will naturally deviate from the commercial platform. On the contrary, young people are more adaptable to emerging platforms. Isolating them from the commercial platform is not conducive to enterprises to improve themselves, nor is it conducive to students to adapt to society. The emergence of new things always has its imperfections, but it is not only forced but also unfair for newcomers to try to show their behavior and avoid medical treatment.