Many students think that there are two obstacles to the philosophy review of postgraduate entrance examination: one is that they can't understand the book in the early stage, and the other is that they can't understand the questions in the later stage. I know every word of this book in black and white, but I can't understand it. I even memorized some places, but I still don't understand them. This is precisely the characteristic of learning philosophy. Why? It is because the water is too deep and the content is too abstract.
If some of Ma Zhe's difficulties are only theoretical and have nothing to do with the exam, we can consider bypassing them. But the problem is that they are often not only theoretical difficulties, but also direct test sites on test papers. There is no other choice. If you want to reach the level of examination in a short time, you have to break the "hard walnut" at several joints and puncture the layers of "enough paper". Students will get twice the result with half the effort if they master the important and difficult points and review them in a targeted way.
So, how to grasp the key points and break through the difficulties? This requires students to use their brains and think of some suitable learning methods.
Ma Zhe's examination content is divided into seven chapters, and everyone is familiar with the specific content. These seven chapters can be divided into five parts.
The first part is the first chapter "Marxist philosophy is a scientific world outlook and methodology". This chapter has a small number of postgraduate questions and a low score. Generally, multiple-choice questions are given, and never analytical questions are given.
The second part "materialism" is the second chapter "the materiality of the world and people's practical activities". In recent years, this chapter has generally given multiple-choice questions and repeated questions from the same knowledge point, but it does not rule out the possibility of analysis questions. When reviewing the essential meaning of practice and the relationship between subject and object, candidates should pay attention to understanding from the perspective of "harmony between man and nature" and "conflict", and pay attention to "seeking truth and being pragmatic" when reviewing the principle of material unity in the world.
Combine them for analysis. In addition, the propositional materials of the real questions in this chapter usually adopt the basic concepts, philosophical sayings, typical cases and the latest progress in the field of contemporary science. Therefore, candidates should collect more famous sayings or current popular philosophical views in the review, and distinguish and summarize them.
The third part "dialectics" is the third chapter "the connection, development and law of the world". This chapter is a dense area of propositions over the years. It is really the "topic nest" of one of the three core chapters of Ma Zhe, and it is also a required reading chapter over the years. This chapter focuses on the principle of universal connection, development process, phenomenon and essence, inevitability and contingency, the relationship between quantitative change and qualitative change, the content and significance of dialectical negation, the principle and significance of contradiction identity and struggle, the relationship and significance of contradiction universality and particularity, Scientific Outlook on Development and materialist dialectics.
The characteristics of the proposition in this chapter are: mainly around the three basic laws and main categories of materialist dialectics, which appear in all kinds of questions; The hot knowledge points in this chapter have the habit of repeating propositions; In this chapter,
The section "Law of Unity of Opposites" is the section with the largest proportion of scores in the examination questions over the years. Candidates should pay attention to using the important principles of this chapter to analyze practical social problems, such as "the philosophical analysis of building a harmonious society and the identity of contradictions, and the connection between materialist dialectics and Scientific Outlook on Development". Cultivate your own thinking mode of analyzing materials and answering questions correctly.
The fourth part "epistemology" is the fourth chapter "the essence and process of cognition". "Dialectics" and "Epistemology" are two chapters. Over the years, the test questions mainly assess the ability of candidates to analyze things, so this chapter will have questions over the years, and most of them are subjective. Candidates should focus on reviewing this chapter in the preparation process.
The fifth part is "historical materialism"
It consists of five chapters, six chapters and seven chapters. This part is the theoretical highlight of Marxist philosophy. This chapter is bound to have problems over the years, and it is the chapter that can best combine theory with practice, and it is also very prone to big problems. The sixth chapter reveals the basic laws of human society and the role of the subject. This chapter has produced multiple-choice questions, analytical questions and analytical questions in previous postgraduate entrance examinations. The number of questions is not much, but the theoretical content also involves many social hotspots, so we should also pay attention to it.
In the seventh chapter, the historical materialism mainly expounds the historical trend of human nature, human value, human development and social progress. This knowledge point can be described as a theoretical commanding height of the China of Marxist philosophy. This chapter is generally multiple-choice questions and analysis questions, and the propositional materials also combine the principles of Marxist political economy, Deng Xiaoping Theory and Theory of Three Represents, and the hot issues in current social, political and economic life.
In the preliminary review, we should grasp several core concepts, grasp the key points of review and make clear the relationship between them. Only in this way can we form a deeper understanding than the average person. The direct result is that the problem cannot be tested. But if you don't understand that philosophy must do this, you will go to carpet bombing without analysis and rely on forced memory, which is not good. Because "reciting" philosophy is not reciting poetry, nor reciting things like pi. Philosophy has its own theoretical system. If we don't understand something with a theoretical system, it's really counterintuitive. The result is far from getting twice the result with half the effort, but it is completely chaotic, just like falling into the fog. In the end, it can only be eaten alive and rushed into battle. So students should pay attention to this aspect.