Bian Xiao, a British-Australian undergraduate program of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, answers for you: These two programs have their own advantages, but the suitable student groups are different.
Suitable for 1+3 students studying abroad:
1, good language performance: one-year preparatory study abroad. If students have a relatively high language foundation, they can improve their language performance to a relatively excellent level through one year of full-time study.
2. The GPA score is relatively high: students need to ask foreign institutions according to the GPA score of high school, and they are required to have a good academic foundation to meet the GPA requirements of ideal institutions.
3. Strong family economic strength: Students studying in the preparatory school need to study abroad for 3-4 years, so there are still high requirements for the economic strength of the students' families.
A group of students suitable for 2+2 study abroad;
1, poor language performance: the 2+2 study abroad program provides students with a two-year study abroad buffer period, so students have enough time to improve their language performance.
2. Low GPA scores: Many students have low GPA scores in high school. They can apply for foreign universities in domestic universities for an average of two years, and they can also transfer some credits together.
3. Ordinary families: Students can save about 400,000 yuan for their families during their two years in domestic universities, which can greatly alleviate their financial pressure.
The above is what Bian Xiao introduced to us: "Choose 1+3 to study abroad or 2+2 to study abroad?"