In the process of disillusionment of Jiang's life and ideals, tutors, classmates, other teachers and students, and even the whole academic environment and college field were pushed to the dock because of "collapse corruption". If we regard this matter as an isolated and accidental individual problem, and only condemn one or two unscrupulous tutors related to this matter, I believe there will be more rivers in the future, which will not help improve the whole institutional environment. Only by reflecting on why every member of the whole education system may become "Eichmann" full of "mediocrity evil" can we ensure that the tragedy will not repeat itself.
In the university environment, it is normal for students to help tutors. I believe that basically postdoctoral students and some undergraduates have similar experiences. In my opinion, what matters in this matter is the tutor's attitude towards the students. That is, students are just cheap labor you can use or your academic successors and successors. Some people, such as my tutor, hold the latter mentality and let some students who he thinks are more capable of training participate in their academic research activities. He only chooses some students to help him write books, publish articles and apply for projects. Correspondingly, we can also enjoy some benefits that other students can't enjoy, such as attending academic conferences with teachers everywhere and being recommended by teachers to other universities at the same level for further study after graduation. Working for a tutor under such circumstances, the students' mentality will certainly not be so contradictory. Other tutors, just like Jiang's tutor, let students write their own articles without hanging their names after publication. They let students learn social experience from receiving express delivery to going out to handle cases. In fact, they are looking for a free secretary. The most terrible thing is that under the current higher education system, such tutors have no rules and space to regulate and punish.
In China, where the higher education system is not yet fully mature, it is obviously a pipe dream to run a school by virtue only by virtue of tutors or school administrators. After all, human nature is selfish, and the oppression of students by "bosses" for their own interests is caused by the special institutional environment. Without the supervision of the higher education law and the articles of association of colleges and universities, and without the two-way selection and distribution mechanism between students and tutors, tutors still have a veto power over whether students graduate or not, and the "back door" and "hidden rules" will one day be profitable in the field of colleges and universities. As long as any of the above points are not realized, a new river will inevitably appear. As a legal person, I don't believe that morality and introspection can completely regulate our environment, and only the system is the best way to manage people.