Foreign-funded enterprises and private enterprises recognize people's ability, quality and ability without civil servants' political examination, so the harm is less. There is still a chance to master it well. I think it is necessary to repeat the rules and regulations. The Ministry of Education requires me to run a school at the age of six and be promoted to the first grade. According to the observation in recent years, many six-year-old children can't keep up with their intellectual development, which leads to learning disabilities, especially in rural areas. Most of them are left-behind children. Being in the first grade means that they don't have to pay tuition, and they can save thousands of dollars a year.
So they have the situation of updating just when they are old. The objective fact is that these children really can't keep up with the rhythm, because they can't repeat the grade, so they have to keep mentioning it, and everyone knows the rest. It is logical that a child like that stays for one year, his intellectual development is closely followed, and his exam results are closely followed. Indeed, this kind of thing used to be very common.
Students who don't have to re-test for the same study time either have poor IQ or poor learning attitude. It is unreasonable for them to give fresh graduates a second interview. The recruitment of students for re-examination by the state is a consumption of network resources in colleges and universities. If you are both students from Tsinghua, Peking University, one is a fresh graduate and the other has studied 10 years, who has strong learning and training ability? How strong can you expect him to be after senior three 10 years? Perhaps some students who repeat the college entrance examination are very capable, but the state cannot spend big assets for small opportunities.