Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - What's the difference between Master of Chinese International Education and teaching Chinese as a foreign language?
What's the difference between Master of Chinese International Education and teaching Chinese as a foreign language?
I am a TCFL undergraduate, and Han Shuo belongs to TCFL, but from another perspective, both Han Shuo and TCFL majors are the direction of postgraduate entrance examination. The differences are as follows:

1, Han Shuo is a professional master, emphasizing practicality; Teaching Chinese as a foreign language is academic and focuses on professional research.

2. In terms of academic system, Han Shuo is two years, and teaching Chinese as a foreign language, like other academic systems, is three years.

3. As far as tuition is concerned, Han Shuo pays for it at his own expense. Generally, there are no public fees and scholarships, and the tuition is very high. After two years, it will basically cost 30,000 to 40,000. You can look at the tuition fees of various schools. However, some schools now offer high scholarships, such as Suzhou University. Teaching Chinese as a foreign language, like general academic types, has public places, scholarships, accommodation and so on.

4. At present, Han Shuo's level of teaching Chinese as a foreign language is generally better than Chinese. After all, it is academic, and it is emerging, and it is expanding its enrollment.

I hope it helps you!