Let's analyze why poor students can get into good big companies:

First, people who work in the company don't need high marks. What comes out of the school is theoretical knowledge, and the skills behind it are slowly practiced. Often in school, the difference lies in the flexibility of the brain.

The second is that this poor student is not doing very well in this major, because he is not interested in this major and spends a lot of energy to study the major he is interested in, and the major he often recruits is right. The major you are interested in hits it off.

Third, some big companies just want to train a group of warehouse cadres. Some people with good grades often think that my grades are so good that I can't be a shopkeeper. In fact, a diploma is a passport. Who knows whether your grades are good or bad after you leave society? Recruiters don't check their grades online.

The fourth is this company. He already has acquaintances in it. You can only pass if you get a diploma at school.

/03087 BF 40 ad 162d 9450 f 34d 5 1 adfa 9 EC 8 b 13cd 12？ X-BCE-process = image/resize, m _ lfit, w _ 450, h _ 600, limit _ 1/quality, q _ 85User 2:

This involves the skills in the interview. Although many people are ignored in universities and their grades are not good, some companies don't care about their grades when recruiting people. Perhaps this student's specialty in one aspect is very suitable for the company's job industry, and his eloquence has left a particularly good impression on the interviewer, so the possibility of being admitted is greatly increased.

Another possibility is that the parents of the students are related to this company and are related households. Even if the parents have nothing to do with the company interviewed, it may be recommended by the teacher to the company. When general counselors treat students to find jobs after graduation, some enterprises will ask counselors to recommend several outstanding students to them. At this time, the teacher will have a quota in his hand. If the student has a good relationship with the teacher and often helps the teacher, it is also possible for the teacher to give him this quota.

During the interview, the interviewer should make full preparations, give an overview of the company to be interviewed, predict in advance the questions that the interviewer may ask, and how to make a perfect answer without harming his own interests. For example, if the interviewer asks you what you think of unpaid overtime, you may be asked to work overtime every day, so you should say: I think it's best not to work overtime, because overtime is an inefficient performance, and I think you should be strict with yourself at work.

Netizen 3:

Proper "bragging" during the interview can also increase the interviewer's goodwill towards you, but don't brag too much. Generally speaking, if you are good at a certain field, you can say that you are proficient in this field and have won any honors (in fact, you are not necessarily). You can really answer even if the interviewer asks you a question about this, but you can't say that you know nothing about computers. You boasted about how awesome your computer was and won the first prize in the national competition.

There are many skills after the interview. The interviewer is basically as good as you or even higher than you, but how to beat them to be admitted, you need to learn some skills and routines.

/aa 64034 f 78 f 0 f 736266 b 1ac 80 155b 3 19 EAC 4 1365？ X-BCE-process = image/resize，m _ lfit，w _ 450，h _ 600，limit _ 1/quality，q _ 85 User 4:

First of all, there is a certain gap between our current education and the real talent demand of enterprises. Enterprises need talents who are not only good at school, but also good at school, which proves that you have strong learning ability. Enterprises often need people with high comprehensive quality, such as strong hands-on ability, strong communication ability, strong organization and coordination ability and quick response. High emotional intelligence, good mentality and so on are all reasons for unit recruitment. As for whether the major is good or not, it mainly depends on social needs, not listening to others.

In fact, many people have had similar questions. When they were in college and high school, many people were excellent, but five years after graduation or 10 years later, those who didn't study hard in those years all had houses and cars. But there are also some people who studied well in those years who are mixed behind the crowd. So what is the reason? The reason is that after graduation, those who did not study well before continue to study, while those who studied well before always think they are excellent and forget to study from now on. So you will fall behind others in a few years.

Therefore, don't look down on others at any time, look at their advantages, and don't always stare at their shortcomings. As long as that person has been working hard, then he is making progress every day.

Netizen 5:

In the interview, I was selected by a big company. To be honest, this probability is possible:

First, large enterprises will naturally have lower conditions in the stage of a large number of urgent moves. As long as the basic conditions are met, you can join the job. Columns can also be similar to robot hands. Or jobs with low technical content;

Second, it is also possible that the company found that this person has abilities other than diploma;

Third, intuitive superficial phenomena may mislead some people. Although this phenomenon may occur occasionally, it can't stand the test after all, and it still condenses the post level. It is luck to think that it is reasonable but unscientific, and it is also a cognition of the natural realm. I don't want this kind of cognition to be recognized more, and I don't want to turn someone else's story Luo Ji into an ideological cognition.

/8b 82b 90 14a 90 f 603 e 425 ca 8 e 32 12b 3 1bb 15 1ed 66？ X-BCE-process = image/resize, m _ lfit, w _ 450, h _ 600, limit _ 1/quality, q _ 85User 6:

When I graduated from college, I went to interview a company with my classmates. Judging from the examination results, my classmates' scores are better than mine, but judging from the comprehensive ability, I should be slightly better than her when I participated in various activities and started my own business during my college years, but the company finally admitted her and eliminated me. Because of different positions, the requirements are different. For example, it is relatively easy for students to interview administrative positions, while I am interviewing personnel positions, and I didn't have relevant certificates and work experience at that time. The major is wrong. During the school period, the internship is biased towards sales, so it is normal to be brushed off.

From the point of view of the employer, the employer will consider the graduation school, academic performance, comprehensive ability and interview performance of the students, not just whether there is a bonus in the exam results. Of course, if they get a bonus and have excellent academic performance, it means that students will be more motivated and positive during their school days, and they will get extra points. However, if you do badly in the interview, the interviewer will feel that he has got high marks and is retarded.