It is said that this standing urinal was invented to advocate the concept of environmental protection and water saving. According to the report, according to a busybody's calculation, women need to use 6 liters of water to flush every time they excrete 300 ml of urine, while men only need 3 liters of water at most to flush with urinals. Only this one, women use at least 10 ~ 12 liters of water more than men every day, and only Shaanxi Normal University can save 160 tons of water every day.
I am weak and not abnormal, so I seldom try anything that feels exciting and risky. For example, I have been afraid to go to the ladies' room, which is a pity. I remember when I was in college, one of my classmates had this hobby, and as a result, he was regarded as a hooligan and severely cleaned up. Seeing with my own eyes that my happy and unlucky classmate experienced traditional moral torture and collective unconscious intimidation, I didn't even have the courage to go sightseeing in the ladies' room. Therefore, there is no chance to see the method and amount of water used by girls to flush urine every time, and there is no condition for scientific measurement. I don't know how the inventor of the female urinal measured the urine volume and water consumption so accurately. According to my somewhat obscene idea, the urine volume of different women should be different from that of the same woman at different times and under different circumstances; How much water is reasonable for flushing toilets is simply a variable. How can we figure out whether 6 liters or 3 liters is more appropriate? It's incredible. But I think, even if this calculation has scientific basis, does it prove that vigorously promoting this female urinal will save water?
For example, saving: According to the sponsor's introduction, this "standing ladies' room" must use an auxiliary tool-female deflector. This is a type A plastic or paper tool. In order to improve the quality of the deflector, the raw materials used are imported from abroad, and the rear end of the deflector is also attached with a water absorption pad. Considering that it is inconvenient for women to stand "conveniently" in clothes, the inventor even specially designed pants with special zippers.
This reminds me of the so-called "energy saving in daylight saving time". People over 30 should remember,
Daylight saving time (DST), which started at 1986, was blown away by some so-called scientists at that time, claiming that as long as DST was implemented, everyone could save 1 kwh of electricity every day. But six years' practice has proved that,
Daylight saving time is not only unable to save energy, but also counterproductive in many fields. Because for low latitudes, summer is very hot and humid, and it is too hot to sleep at night. Early morning is a good time to sleep. Daylight saving time saves electricity for lighting, but wastes electricity for air conditioning. In the first few months of daylight saving time, people still get up very cold and need to turn on the air conditioner to keep warm. In summer, it is still very hot when people come home from work, and they have to turn on the air conditioner to cool down. Therefore, energy consumption can not be saved, but will cause greater waste.
Therefore, it is really not clear that some people who think they are smart can slap their heads one-sidedly, which requires a comprehensive and scientific analysis! We have done a lot of stupid things in the past, saving sesame seeds but wasting watermelon!
As for the idea of environmental protection and sanitation, I also highly doubt it. For those "guide plates" and "absorption pads", it will be wasteful and unrealistic to promote the use of disposable ones; If recycling is adopted, the hygiene situation and even cross-infection will be caused, which is really "alarmist" by people who are not familiar with "women's morality", and some are "alarmist".
Let's start with saving time. According to my reasonable imagination, a woman's urination should end with squatting, flushing and flushing. Now, of course, the almost negligible squat time of a few seconds is omitted. But I think it's enough for girls to play with things like "deflector" and "absorbent pad", not to mention spending more time washing their hands because of repeated contact with those public appliances.
It is even more shocking to report that the inventor of the female urinal is a 65-year-old retired female engineer. It is said that the great significance of her invention lies in making women "stand up" like men through the revolution of urination mode.
. This makes me even more puzzled about normal men. I was wretched and bored, and I thought hard for a long time. I really can't think of the relationship between men standing to pee and women squatting to pee. Anyone with a little brain will understand that this different urination posture is completely caused by the different structures and shapes of male and female reproductive organs. If this is not the case, men who used to be arrogant and often despised women should keep this relatively leisure and noble form of going to the toilet for themselves, while women may only have to stand aside and urinate.
Writing here, it suddenly occurred to me that the posture of dogs of different sexes is very different. Animals are probably not smart enough to prove their gender advantage by peeing, right? If you urinate standing up, it proves that women "stand up", which is really ironic; Besides, women nowadays have never stood up except to pee. What other aspects have they not come forward? I really can't think of it! Considering the characteristics of physiological structure, isn't it more humane to leave the last piece of self-esteem to men in urinating posture? Moreover, according to my understanding, equality between men and women mainly refers to equality in personality and dignity rights; As long as there is gender, equality in physiological structure will never be realized. In this case, the posture of urinating has to be the same as that of men. Why bother?
Practice and time are the criteria for testing truth; The change of ideas also needs to consider physiological reality. It is said that this kind of urinal for women, which costs a lot of money, is not only environmentally friendly and saves money, but also makes women feel the elegance and pride of women when standing to urinate, and increases their self-esteem and self-confidence. But the fact is, according to the inventor's own statistics, the standing female urinal made by Ye Ganlin cost 6,543,800 yuan.