The above understanding is that students include primary and secondary schools in a large range, but Asians only refer to the Asian region, including other countries. Don't steal concepts, adjust your mentality, understand mistakes and correct them.

In the latter proposition, "Asians are earthlings" is the major premise and "China people are Asians" is the minor premise. On the premise, GAI； in Asia; Under the minor premise, Asians are not GAI. But that is not the point. The reasoning process of this syllogism is: the major premise is true, the minor premise is true, and GAI is a "China person", so the conclusion is true.

Extended data:

This judgment only determines the partial extension (at least one) (not all) of the subject "integer", so the subject "integer" is not GAI. Because it doesn't judge all the objects of the predicate "odd number" (it doesn't say what is "odd number" and what is not "odd number"), the predicate "odd number" is not GAI.

It must be noted that although we know that "odd numbers" are all integers, the truth of "odd numbers are all integers" is not from the judgment of "some integers are odd numbers" itself, but with the help of mathematical knowledge outside this judgment. So we still think that the odd number here is not GAI.