Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - I am a graduate student of Finance College, and I want to be admitted to Nankai University or Tianjin University. How should I review?
I am a graduate student of Finance College, and I want to be admitted to Nankai University or Tianjin University. How should I review?
Prepare four textbooks designated by the school early. Of these four books, Gao Hongye's two sensory systems are not bad, which are very suitable for beginners like me. After reading it carefully, I will have a general understanding of the basic framework of economics. Moreover, judging from the real questions over the years, especially in the last two years, the proportion of higher education is very large, about 100, so we must thoroughly understand it. Alice's book is more difficult, but it is vivid, rich in examples and unique in point of view, which can be regarded as a supplement and auxiliary role in the designated teaching materials.

In addition to the four reference books designated by the school, I also searched some experience stickers on the forum and took the classics of the predecessors of Nankai Jingyuan. But to be honest, as a cross-examination candidate, I am also confused about all kinds of supplementary teaching materials other than reference books, especially the so-called intermediate supplementary teaching materials, such as Man Kun, Fan Lian, Dornbush and Pindick. And he doesn't know which to read. Later, on the basis of reading the designated four textbooks, I bought a set of research on the analysis of real questions over the years (the kind with answers), and found that the things in the middle are not as magical as the online legend, although I still have to read them (after all, some real questions can't find explanations and answers in the designated textbooks), but the proportion of test scores is not as big as I expected, and it means at most 30 to 40 points. However, the advantage of reading these books is that your answers will be broader and deeper, and the bonus effect here may even exceed thirty or forty points. When I reviewed, I synthesized a lot of experience and materials, and chose the macro of Man Kun and the micro of Fan Lian. The former is less difficult and easier to understand; The latter should be recognized. For example, this year's topic, the topic of currency shock affecting the real economy, Man Kun's related discussion involves several schools, which is more comprehensive and deeper than Gao's. In addition, Jin's real questions and analysis of national college economics are also good materials. It is recommended to buy it. Many times, the questions of various schools are repeated. This book is similar to an economics question bank. Maybe the exam in Nankai next year will be the questions given by other schools in a certain year. Of course, the most important thing about this book is that the answers are very comprehensive. Although it is a bit boring, it is impossible to write so comprehensively in three hours during the exam. But if you know more, you will be able to practice and follow suit with confidence. I just thought of so many textbooks for the time being ~

Regarding the planning of review time, I personally feel that the first round of review should be completed at the end of August. This round is mainly about the review of mathematics, English and specialized courses. Mathematics is the easiest subject to score in all exam subjects. Because it involves a wide range, it is also a relatively difficult subject, which requires candidates to pay a lot of time and energy. English mainly depends on the usual accumulation. In a round of review, it is mainly to improve your vocabulary by doing more reading comprehension, and to be familiar with the abnormal patterns and routines of English for postgraduate entrance examination (this is very important, don't memorize word books, unless you have memory training or talent, it will certainly have no effect). Politics is the easiest way to improve grades in a short time, so it is not the focus of a round of review. The first round of systematic review of general professional courses should begin in May-June. After the first round of review, the principle part should be understood, and on the basis of understanding, it can be roughly remembered and the calculation part can be roughly understood.

The second round (September-165438+1October) can seriously start political review. However, we should not lose math, English and specialized courses, especially specialized courses, and strengthen our memory. At this stage, specialized courses must be able to memorize and master basic knowledge points skillfully.

The third round (65438+ exam from February 65438 to1early October) was a special surprise, focusing on sorting out and summarizing the shortcomings of various subjects. Everyone knows the barrel theory, not to mention five points (total score+single subject 4 lines) in the initial test of postgraduate entrance examination, and all subjects are basically declared failing. A few years ago, Nankai also had a precedent of learning to master specialties, but the conditions for specialties were generally very harsh. Although there is no explicit provision, it is basically that professional courses must have high scores (generally above 130), and public courses can only fail in one subject, and the failing score cannot exceed 5 points. Of course, you can also choose to adjust the master's degree, but the score of the master's degree is generally low, and the single subject line will not be much lower than the academic master's degree. There is still a big opportunity for the master of finance to adjust. For example, there are more than 50 places for masters in finance, about 40 masters in international business and 20 masters in insurance. The total number is more than 100, and dozens of places are reserved for master's adjustment.

Finally, I wish you a successful postgraduate entrance examination!