Guo was sentenced to life imprisonment for killing his girlfriend many years ago, but he was released in the last two years. Among them, * * * experienced nine commutation before and after, and this cruel murderer was released into the society because of his father's bribery. This matter has been covered up for a long time. At that time, the internet was underdeveloped, and not many people paid attention to this unusual murderer with reduced sentence. Until this year's epidemic, Guo once again committed a mask murder. He hit a 70-year-old man who kindly reminded him to wear a mask to die. This case exposed the dusty past and set off a hot discussion on whether commutation is appropriate.

The past has been brought up again, and many netizens strongly questioned why a murderer sentenced to life imprisonment was given so many opportunities to reduce his sentence, and why such criminals were released and continued to endanger society. Within half an hour of the fermentation of the incident, six units related to the case issued documents respectively, initiated the retrial of the case, and overturned the case again to see if there was any improper handling.

Guo was originally sentenced to life imprisonment in this case, and his family bribed the prison staff to contact his personal connections everywhere to reduce his sentence. The survey results involved 13 people, including prison instructors, prison directors, judges, legal representatives of several companies, TV employees, managers and so on. These people use cash, shopping cards, etc. Instructing grass-roots personnel to submit applications for commutation, examine and approve on their own, and cover up Japan, engage in malpractices for selfish ends, and accept bribes for commutation. This kind of behavior is totally inconsistent with party member's status and is a contempt for the law.

This old case was finally revealed to the world, and the decadent atmosphere of taking bribes and bending the law and taking money to handle affairs was rectified. In the end, it can trace back to the source, safeguard the dignity of the judiciary, and also give public officials a warning that the power in their hands should be used reasonably, and they should not do things that violate the law and discipline, let alone take chances. The French Open is long and sparse!