The current appraisal centers and hospitals have no moral bottom line, and they have lost their conscience and professional ethics for the benefit. During the rescue of my family's patients in the intensive care unit of the county hospital, the hospital sought benefits under the guise of closed management of the intensive care unit. In Yichuan County People's Hospital, ineffective drugs overdue for three months (not excluding the behavior of individual medical staff) have been lost for several days in a row, and they are the key drugs to reduce intracranial pressure. At the same time, it was found that other patients in the same department were also input with expired drugs of the same batch number, resulting in multiple disabilities and deaths. As evidence, only two empty bottles were smuggled out. I called the nurse on duty to check the medical waste bag. At the beginning, the hospital admitted to losing five or six bottles of expired drugs to my patients, because the medical waste in the early stage had been treated, and it was impossible to see how much it had cost. Later, at the hearing of the forensic identification center of Sun Yat-sen University, the hospital argued that those drugs were used by other patients, and only admitted that we had lost a bottle of expired drugs, but the identification center dared to make an expert opinion to reverse the black and white facts, saying that "using one bottle is the same as using multiple bottles". Is drinking a little poison the same as drinking a bottle of poison? Expert opinion is responsible for 5% of the hospital's use expiration. I don't know how this happened. Even the molecular weight of mannitol in the drug instructions is 182. 17, and the appraisal opinion is 180. 14. Glycerol, fructose and sodium chloride have no "rebound" effect, but they are identified as "rebound" effect, so the effect and performance of the drugs are irrelevant. Are they also wrong than the drug instructions published by the State Administration of Pharmaceutical Products? 201May 1 1 Expired in July 1 1 Repeated use was found, and it was more than 90 days before and after the appraisal opinion. Can such an appraisal opinion be convincing? This is not for patients. What is this? An appraisal center that doesn't respect facts and science is inhuman. It takes 1 1 100 yuan to send data to the center, and 180 days to remit money. /kloc-notified a hearing 0/80 days later, and after the hearing, 180 days sent us the results. Used for more than a year. I have the heart to kill these animals!