Yesterday morning, the case was publicly heard in Pukou District People's Court.
[The invigilator said] More than 20 candidates were caught cheating, and the invigilator was surrounded for 20 minutes.
At the beginning of July 2006, it was the time for the final exam of a university in Nanjing. One morning, the school teacher Dong Zhiwei invigilated a science subject. At the end of the exam, more than 20 students took advantage of the confusion of handing in papers and copied from each other. Teacher Dong saw this scene clearly, and he accepted the papers of 22 of them. Now, the examination room is boiling! "At that time, some students not only refused to admit their mistakes, but besieged me. I can only ask another teacher to report to the Academic Affairs Office and come out in 20 minutes. " Teacher Dong still remembers that when he finally broke through from the students, some students continued to insult him, angry and chilling. He insisted that he had done nothing wrong!
Just after the exam, some students posted "the invigilator leaked the questions"
Many students don't believe that Mr. Dong cheated by taking the test paper. Among them, ginger has the fastest "reaction speed". At noon that day, he immediately posted on the campus forum of a website and personally attacked Dong Zhiwei. "He (Jiang) distorted the facts in his post and slandered me for leaking the topic to some students, which led to insults from students for more than two years." Teacher Dong said.
As soon as Jiang's net post came out, it immediately became a hot topic in the forum at that time. Among the candidates whose test papers were confiscated that day, some people wore vests to insult posts, and insulting words such as "garbage teacher", "despicable" and "pervert" began to appear on the forum.
"Zhao's post is simply swearing, and the insult is unbearable," Dong Zhiwei went on to say. "Wei followed by abuse. By that time, he had already graduated from work. During his school days, he failed in many exams and make-up exams. In addition to using extremely dirty language, the post also clamored for revenge and murder. "
Two months later, the students posted "Teachers value women over men"
After the summer vacation in 2006, Mr. Dong was once again pushed to the forefront of school public opinion! It turned out that in September of that year, student Du Mou said on the Internet: "(Dong Zhiwei) all the girls were spared, and the boys were single digits!" He questioned his character and morality.
As soon as this statement came out, Mr. Dong's students immediately stood in two teams on the forum: one team was "anti-Dong faction", some of them said that "Mr. Dong's preference for boys was outrageous", and some of them simply cursed some dirty words. The other team is the "Ding Dong School", but their remarks are completely opposite-"As long as you don't go out of line in class at ordinary times, how can you fail if you listen a little?" "Don't study at ordinary times, admitted to the face to scold the teacher. At present, the general situation in universities is that girls study much harder than boys. What is there to question about the height of girls? "
Teacher Dong himself was very annoyed with Du Mou's remarks. He could not bear to say, "At the beginning of July 2006, I confiscated 22 people's papers, and several girls failed. I taught Du's class. In their exams, more than 30% students in other classes got more than 90 points, and many people got 100 points. For Du Mou's class, this course is optional. They don't pay attention to it, and their exam results are even worse. As he (Du Mou) said later, he didn't care about this course or this achievement, so he only got 8 points. This is an elective course. He can take other courses instead of this grade. But I didn't expect him to insult, slander and personally attack me on the Internet many times! "
The teacher filed a claim in court and the students were absent collectively.
At 9 o'clock yesterday morning, the court was slightly deserted and the dock was empty. The collective absence of Jiang, Zhao, Wei and Du forced Dong Zhiwei to explain to the judge again why he had to go to court with four students.
"I just want to confront them face to face. I admit that my class is difficult, but if I listen carefully and listen carefully, I can pass the exam. " "These students don't listen to lectures in class, cheat in exams, and make rumors to insult me." Teacher Dong's voice trembled slightly, and her excitement was beyond words.
After the trial began, Mr. Dong told the judge that he hoped to increase the subject of litigation. It turned out that he asked each student for 20 thousand yuan for mental and reputation compensation. "But these days I have been collecting such cases, domestic and foreign, and the more I look at them, the more angry I get." Teacher Dong thinks that he has every reason to raise the claim price, whether it is to compare the circumstances of students being insulted and slandered, or to compare the psychological shadow and mental damage caused to students by this incident in the past two years.
The presiding judge told Mr. Dong that if he insisted on changing the litigation request, today's trial could not continue, and he needed to re-serve the litigation request to the four defendants in procedure.
"Yes, I insist (change the claim)!" Teacher Dong said. Subsequently, he wrote a written application, demanding that the claim amount of Jiang and Du be raised to 30,000 yuan and that of Zhao and Wei be raised to 25,000 yuan. The judge announced that the court session would not be held again, and the court session time would be notified separately.
Some accused students posted apologies online.
It is reported that Jiang, Zhao, Mou Wei and Du all graduated from universities, and the ideas of the four defendants are unknown. But on the Internet, the reporter saw that someone had apologized to him:
"I'm Du Mou, a student of X Class. In an article in September 2006, I used some radical language. Although my original intention was not directed at Mr. Dong himself, but the score of the exam, I didn't explain it in detail, which caused a great misunderstanding. I hereby solemnly apologize to Mr. Dong and beg for forgiveness. Don't be angry! And wish him good health! You did a good job. The whole family is happy! "
Another one is Zhao's-"For the post of' shelling Dong Zhiwei', I said in my reply that Teacher Dong had a bad influence and I regretted it very much. I realized my mistake under the education of teachers and police uncles. Here, I sincerely apologize to Teacher Dong and hope that the teacher will forgive me! "
When I mentioned the student's apology, Mr. Dong didn't respond positively in the court hearing yesterday. However, he did mention another thing: one night in early February this year, his door was knocked on intermittently for half an hour. "On New Year's Day, I was alone at home. I didn't know the good guys and bad guys, and I didn't dare to open the door." The judge reminded that perhaps the defendant student came to apologize. Teacher Dong immediately replied, "If you want to apologize to me, you should say it openly in the office in broad daylight, instead of sneaking around in the dark."
The school says it helps to purify the environment of the school forum.
It is particularly worth mentioning that Dong Zhiwei also said in his complaint that "most of the students who participated in prisoner abuse were not dealt with seriously by the relevant departments afterwards", which is another factor that he "had to resort to the law".
In this regard, last night, the reporter interviewed Minister Xu of the school's propaganda department.
Reporter: So, what do you think of the whole incident that Teacher Dong sued four students?
Minister Xu: Dialectically, there are both unfavorable and favorable factors. On the negative side, it affects the overall image of the school, and then it will affect every student; However, it is also positive. Nowadays, it is common for college students to scold teachers and leaders on the Internet. Teacher Dong's lawsuit will inevitably form new constraints on our campus forum and purify the environment of the forum. Even online, every student is responsible for his own speech.
Reporter: Teacher Dong said in the complaint that the school did not seriously deal with the students who cheated and abused. what do you think?
Minister Xu: Our school is very strict about the direction of the exam. Once it is verified that cheating is true, it will be dealt with seriously and students will not get a degree. Of course, it needs a strict procedure to determine that students cheat, otherwise students will not get a degree and will sue the school in turn, right? Therefore, the statement that "the school has not dealt with it seriously" needs further verification.
Senior judges called on students to strengthen self-discipline and supervision of the Internet.
"Usually, we don't take exam discipline seriously. After cheating was discovered, we didn't reflect on ourselves, but blamed the teacher. This clearly reflects the weakness of several students' moral quality and legal consciousness. As a bystander, Peng Xiaozheng, president of the Juvenile Court of Pukou District Court, expressed some feelings: "In the face of cheating, teachers can't turn a blind eye, let alone break the rules of fairness and integrity anywhere, especially in university examination rooms.
Peng Xiaozheng believes that nowadays, because of the low threshold, the Internet has become a platform for some people to "talk indiscriminately" and "dare to speak". They put on "vests" to criticize and vent their dissatisfaction, but they completely ignore the reputation, feelings and negative influence of others. "It can be said that the abuse and slander suffered by this teacher (Dong Zhiwei) is extreme, so he rarely goes to court."