The social science edition of Xi Agricultural Journal 1.9 was submitted, and the number 1.22 showed that it passed the preliminary examination and was sent to the external audit, and then the editorial department was given the Spring Festival holiday. After the Spring Festival, the review was presented on February 22nd, and an email was sent to ask for withdrawal. The external audit opinions fed back by magazines are very detailed and targeted, and experts pay more attention to the selection of indicators and policy suggestions. /kloc-revised and uploaded in March of 0/6, and finally, the editor-in-chief made a final review. It took a month to receive the employment email and pay the page fee. Nine versions of 1500 are cheaper. I communicated with the editor three times in the middle. The editorial teacher has a good attitude and will not reject the manuscript because of urging.
This journal only accepts doctoral students and above first authors, and the duplicate checking rate is required. I don't know what that is. Later, he submitted an article with a rejection rate of 19.7%, and only accepted contributions on the issues concerning agriculture, countryside and farmers. Compared with the standardization of articles, the speed of reviewing C journals is relatively fast, and it is basically no problem to make corrections after withdrawing manuscripts.