Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - What is the direct theoretical source of Ma Zhe?
What is the direct theoretical source of Ma Zhe?
It is generally believed that the direct theoretical sources of Marxist philosophy are mainly Hegel's dialectics and Feuerbach's materialism, but there are "countless treasures" in Hegel's idealistic philosophy building, such as historical materialism and dialectical materialism in "seeds" and "buds", which are also the direct theoretical sources of Marxist philosophy. Lenin said this most directly and definitely.

The following is an article in Journal of Jiangxi Normal University, which I hope will help you:

Rethinking on the direct theoretical source of Marxist philosophy

Donglin Xiang

It is generally believed that the direct theoretical source of Marxist philosophy is mainly Hegel's debate.

Proof and Feuerbach's materialism, but Hegel's idealism philosophy building has "countless treasures."

Such as "seed" and "budding state" in historical materialism and dialectical materialism, are also Marxist philosophy.

The direct theoretical source of. Lenin said this most directly and definitely.

Keywords Marxist philosophy theory source Hegel's philosophy and Lenin's philosophy notes

On the direct theoretical source of Marxist philosophy

The problem is relatively public in China Marxist theoretical circle.

View of recognition: "German classical philosophy is mainly Hegel's.

Dialectics and Feuerbach's materialism are Marx.

The direct theoretical source of Marxist philosophy. ""in theory, they

Abandoned Hegel's idealism system and absorbed it critically.

The "reasonable core" of his dialectics; The abandoned Feuerbach

Metaphysics in Philosophy, Religion and Ethical Idealism

Impurities critically absorbed the basic connotation of its materialism.

Nuclear energy. I think the above viewpoint is an important aspect.

Even if it is the main aspect, it is not enough, or

It's a bit simplistic, especially underestimating Hegel's philosophy.

Next, I will only say "Hegel"-the transitional period of modern times.

"Circle in philosophy: ... Hegel-Feuerbach.

-Marx "(2) a little talk about one or two starting points, in order to go deeper.

Understanding the history from Hegel's philosophy to Marxist philosophy

Importance and fundamentality.

(A) "Hegel-Feuerbach-Marx"

This "philosophical circle" truly reveals the "mark"

Philosophy of thinking is dialectical materialism "③ Scientific world outlook.

The direct source of theory and its inevitability.

Engels talked about "Hegelian system" and its "power"

"Sex Structure" says: "People stop as long as they are not unnecessary.

Stay in front of them, but go deep into the building and then

You will find countless treasures, even today.

Still keep the full value. (4) it should be pointed out that this "countless.

Treasure, the most fundamental and outstanding is Hegel's calendar.

"Seed" and "Germination" of Historical Materialism and Dialectical Materialism

Bud ". It is this "budding genius thinking"

An Application and Development of Zi —— (5) (The "bud" here

Only when the translation of "germ" corresponds to "seed" did Haig come into being.

This way of thinking also has the rationality of Hegel's dialectics.

Kernel ". So Lenin said: "Hegel's dialectics is thought. "

The summary of history, from the perspective of the history of various sciences, is more specific and more

It will be a very useful task to study this point in detail.

Generally speaking, logically, the history of thought should correspond to the law of thinking.

Matches "6 because," the concept (understanding) in existence (in the straight

Expose the essence (causality, identity, difference, etc.). ) in the following phenomenon

Wait a minute. )-the whole human understanding of truth (all sciences).

First, like, progress and process is like this. Self, nature, science, learning and politics, governance, economy and learning.

So is the process of [and history]. "All landowners Lenin here.

The idea of discussion is the same as that of Engels in the following paragraph.

In agreement, their agreement is to criticize Haig.

What you achieved in time is really a tacit understanding of history! Friedrich Engels

Said: "the laws of thinking and nature, as long as they are correct."

Mutual understanding must be consistent with each other. "Of course, this recognition today.

The consistency of knowledge should include social laws, historical processes,

Because this "is dialectical rather than metaphysical in the final analysis."