Do you have different views on the advantages and disadvantages of college students? Let's take a look at how a debate about the pros and cons of college students' falling in love is debated. The following is my collection of whether the advantages of college students' love outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages (debate contest). Welcome to reading. Please continue to pay attention to the debate column for more information!

I argued:

Thank you, Chairman, other debaters and students.

Our view is that college students do more harm than good in falling in love! !

Obeying orders is the first duty of soldiers, and the primary responsibility of students, especially a group of college students, must be "learning"! ! University is a transitional period from school to society. In this period, we should not only learn how to be a man and how to do things, but also learn our own professional knowledge. I don't know when and why the other debater will put more energy into your current love! !

A university professor once pointed out: "when college students fall in love, one group of people without economic income supports another large group of people!" ! "This is a word worthy of our deep thought!

Did the other debater forget those parents who worked hard for us to study at home with their backs to the loess?

Is the other debater willing to waste unnecessary money on your so-called "love"?

Isn't there a trace of bitterness in your heart when the other debater does this? (cheers and applause last forever! ! )

However, the country now allows college students to get married, and the previously closed door is now open to college students, but what is the premise of opening? As early as April, 20001year, the country cancelled the age limit for college entrance examination personnel. In other words, the university left a door for older young people, and another debater, 19, was 20 years old. At that time, he was "just a classmate and teenager, in his prime, a scholar with high spirits and high spirits". Don't the other debater want to live a good life? ! ! Four years of college life is short and precious. We also advised the other debater not to spend time kissing me, but to work hard. He succeeded, why didn't the hero marry! ! ! !

To sum up, it can fully show my view that college students do more harm than good in falling in love. Thank you! !

(Applause extended again)

Summary of debate:

Thank you, Madam President. As early as the 1980s, our country carried out reform and opening-up, the economy developed, human beings advanced, and college students' minds were also open. Just a few days ago, at the party member swearing-in meeting of the Art Department, the secretary who just transferred to our college pointed out at the meeting: We are not against college students falling in love, but we do not advocate college students falling in love! ! "Dear debaters, let's take a look at the familiar campus around us. In public, men and women hug and even kiss in public. The leader added: two people hate each other and embrace into one person! ! ! ! This is what we call "college students" (three words fluctuate greatly), which is pathetic and deplorable! !

Why not forbid college students to fall in love?

At that time, because of the existence of those older young people in the university! !

But why don't our college and our leaders encourage college students to fall in love?

Because college students do more harm than good in falling in love! ! !

Thank you!

Extended reading: detailed rules of debate

1. Time prompt. During the debate, when each side has 30 seconds left, the timekeeper will give a yellow card reminder. When the time is up, show a red card to stop speaking, and the debater must stop speaking, otherwise it will be dealt with in violation of regulations.

2. Make a statement. Explain that the evidence is conclusive and sufficient, and the quotation is appropriate.

3. Make an opening statement. Argumentation requires facts as the basis, laws as the criterion, clear logic and concise words.

Attacks and arguments

(1) The debate on offense and defense begins with two debates, and the pros and cons alternate.

(2) The pros and cons participate in the debate. A summary of the debate between the pros and cons. Two or three arguments must be used as an attacker once; The defense is arbitrarily designated by the attacker, and the number of times is not limited. Both the offensive and defensive sides must complete this round of attack and defense independently, and cannot be replaced in the middle.

(3) Both sides must answer each other's questions directly, and the questions and answers should be concise and clear. Repeated questions and evasive questions will be deducted. In each round of attack and defense, the attacked party shall not ask questions, otherwise points will be deducted. Don't ask questions that affect the integrity of the other party's defense, and don't stop the other party from asking questions with a lengthy defense. The host has the right to terminate one party's overtime question or reply.

(4) The pros and cons complete the first round of debate. When either side takes a seat, it is deemed that its own attack and defense has been completed, and the other player will appear at will (make a statement or continue to ask questions) within a limited time.

(5) The stage of each round of attack and defense is 1 min 30 seconds. Neither the offensive nor the defensive set a time. When there are 30 seconds left, they will get a yellow card. When the time is up, they will show a red card to stop speaking.

(6) After the completion of the four rounds of offensive and defensive stage, the offensive and defensive summary should be made on the positive side first, and then the offensive and defensive summary should be made on the negative side for the team. The time limit is 1 min and 30 seconds. Both sides should summarize the situations and contents involved in the offensive and defensive stage, and it is strictly forbidden to recite the manuscript from the actual situation of the game.

5. Free debate. In this round of debate, the pros and cons automatically take turns to speak. First, anyone who agrees to stand up and speak, the speaker's seat is the timing sign that his speech ends and another speaker begins. Another speaker must speak at once. If there is a gap, the accumulation will proceed as usual. There is no limit to the order in which the same debater speaks. If one party runs out of time, the other party can continue to speak or signal the chairman to give up speaking. Free debate advocates active confrontation, and the party who avoids confrontation more than twice on important issues will be deducted, and the questions that the other party has clearly answered will be deducted appropriately.

6. Closing arguments. Both sides of the debate should make a summary statement on the overall form of the debate, be divorced from reality, recite the prepared manuscript in advance, and deduct points appropriately.

7. The audience asks questions. The performance of the pros and cons in the audience questioning stage is included in the competition results. The questions raised by the audience can only be answered after more than two judges have judged them valid. The audience is free to ask their own questions, and the pros and cons each answer the questions raised by two spectators, and both sides answer any debater except the four debates. The answer time of a question cannot exceed 1 min for 30 seconds. If one debater's answer time is not full, other debaters can supplement it. In the debate, the debaters of each team can concentrate the information on the self-made cards for reference when speaking, but they can't read the prepared manuscripts or show the prepared charts or plates. In a free debate, players can provide clues to each other. )

;