First, on the basis of inspection
My view is this: the foundation that has passed the judicial examination will be helpful for the next year, and many new laws will be promulgated next year, which will also add many obstacles to the exchange of old and new knowledge. As for whether it was a law book before, I personally feel that it is of little help, except for those who really went to the library in college and studied law seriously. At this point, there is no need to feel thin about the illegal version, and there is no need to feel superior to the French version. It may be more practical to start reviewing honestly.
Second, about the judicial examination materials
There are different opinions on the forum of Legalist Network, some say that three books are king, and some say that the textbooks of major schools are simple. Personally, according to the trend in the past two years, especially this year, the era of simply listening to tapes and reciting handouts in the past is really no longer useful for reference. Judicial examination tends to examine depth on the basis of breadth. It really takes time to lay a solid foundation if you want to live a less thrilling life. In the past three years, I have used the method of reading three major books and the teaching materials of special lectures. The summarized experience is that the above two methods are not an either-or relationship. The authority of the three books is comprehensive, and the shortcomings are not prominent. The lectures are relatively concentrated, but there are inevitably omissions. As far as we are concerned, the focus is on which textbook you can keep reading or find more acceptable, which may be in a state of concentration. You can get such a preliminary conclusion through a short attempt to guide your choice. I suggest that after students decide to choose one, they should look for this set of textbooks and stick to learning for a long time. That's all that matters. After reading a textbook carefully, you will establish a complete system of your own, and the gains you get are far greater than spending a lot of time hesitating to read this today and that tomorrow. As for reading it several times, it is a state of "reading essence". I think this standard can't be accurate. It depends on your concentration. I belong to the type of reading slowly and carefully. I can only read about 10 pages an hour, and more than half of them only read 5 pages an hour on average. So when I read all the textbooks, I can feel that I have basically reached the state of intensive reading for students' reference.
Third, about the exam class.
It seems that some students are confused whether to report to class, to report to the network or to the scene, and to report to class A or class B. I haven't reported for classes for two years, but I have reported for full-time classes for about two months in one year. Personally, I feel that this problem cannot be generalized. It still depends on the different situations of the students themselves. I hope that when students consider this question, they will first consider several factors related to this question: What is the biggest resistance you encounter in your study? If external factors prevent you from entering a state of complete concentration and your plan cannot be carried out for various reasons, this may be a good way to relieve anxiety. The role of the study class is to instill a system into you through external forces, and at the same time give everyone a less disturbed atmosphere, which can force you to sort out the progress of your study. But in the above three aspects, you can still do it yourself even if you don't report to class. The review period of department examination is short. If you can suddenly review yourself, it will be more effective to attend classes at home.
First, on the basis of inspection
My view is this: the foundation that has passed the judicial examination will be helpful for the next year, and many new laws will be promulgated next year, which will also add many obstacles to the exchange of old and new knowledge. As for whether it was a law book before, I personally feel that it is of little help, except for those who really went to the library in college and studied law seriously. At this point, there is no need to feel thin about the illegal version, and there is no need to feel superior to the French version. It may be more practical to start reviewing honestly.
Second, about the judicial examination materials
There are different opinions on the forum of Legalist Network, some say that three books are king, and some say that the textbooks of major schools are simple. Personally, according to the trend in the past two years, especially this year, the era of simply listening to tapes and reciting handouts in the past is really no longer useful for reference. Judicial examination tends to examine depth on the basis of breadth. It really takes time to lay a solid foundation if you want to live a less thrilling life. In the past three years, I have used the method of reading three major books and the teaching materials of special lectures. The summarized experience is that the above two methods are not an either-or relationship. The authority of the three books is comprehensive, and the shortcomings are not prominent. The lectures are relatively concentrated, but there are inevitably omissions. As far as we are concerned, the focus is on which textbook you can keep reading or find more acceptable, which may be in a state of concentration. You can get such a preliminary conclusion through a short attempt to guide your choice. I suggest that after students decide to choose one, they should look for this set of textbooks and stick to learning for a long time. That's all that matters. After reading a textbook carefully, you will establish a complete system of your own, and the gains you get are far greater than spending a lot of time hesitating to read this today and that tomorrow. As for reading it several times, it is a state of "reading essence". I think this standard can't be accurate. It depends on your concentration. I belong to the type of reading slowly and carefully. I can only read about 10 pages an hour, and more than half of them only read 5 pages an hour on average. So when I read all the textbooks, I can feel that I have basically reached the state of intensive reading for students' reference.
Third, about the exam class.
It seems that some students are confused whether to report to class, to report to the network or to the scene, and to report to class A or class B. I haven't reported for classes for two years, but I have reported for full-time classes for about two months in one year. Personally, I feel that this problem cannot be generalized. It still depends on the different situations of the students themselves. I hope that when students consider this question, they will first consider several factors related to this question: What is the biggest resistance you encounter in your study? If external factors prevent you from entering a state of complete concentration and your plan cannot be carried out for various reasons, this may be a good way to relieve anxiety. The role of the study class is to instill a system into you through external forces, and at the same time give everyone a less disturbed atmosphere, which can force you to sort out the progress of your study. But in the above three aspects, you can still do it yourself even if you don't report to class. The review period of department examination is short. If you can suddenly review yourself, it will be more effective to attend classes at home.
I am a member of Huaxia Grade Examination, which I bought last year. There are many make-up classes in it. I think this way is very good. For recording, you can choose to listen or not to listen according to your personal preference. I didn't pay attention to the recording at first, nor did I listen. However, if I sign up for a remedial class, a remedial class may not include all the good teachers. Teachers in the general industry will be assigned to more than three remedial classes. Of course, the recording of the so-called 10 remedial class is completely unnecessary. It is enough to get the complete courses of three remedial classes. It would be better if there were videos. Video can help us concentrate. My classmate participated in Huaxia Examination Network, which is said to be OK. I also bought a Chinese exam member on his recommendation.
Fourth, about the review order of department exams.
The review order varies from person to person according to students' habits. At this point, I suggest that while making a plan, the most important thing is the implementation of the plan. Many times, we will encounter all kinds of problems, which will upset or may upset our plans. I used to feel angry and anxious about it. Later, I gradually matured and began to analyze whether the reason for interrupting the plan was external or my own. If it is external reasons, there is nothing more impatient than this; If it is due to your own reasons (such as laziness and burnout), you can consider changing your plan to lower your expectations while reflecting on yourself, and achieve a more harmonious balance by strengthening self-discipline and partially adjusting your plan.
At the same time, I will give you my review order for reference: intensive reading of textbooks, intensive reading of handouts, analysis of real questions (theoretical methods and business classics have not been finished yet), and finally a surprise attack on the handouts of the new law before the exam. The time dimension is from the end of April to the exam. It gradually increases from 3.4 hours a day, and it is about 7 or 8 hours in July and August. Comprehensive review begins in September (day and night) until the exam 15 minutes.
Fourth, about the review order of department exams.
The review order varies from person to person according to students' habits. At this point, I suggest that while making a plan, the most important thing is the implementation of the plan. Many times, we will encounter all kinds of problems, which will upset or may upset our plans. I used to feel angry and anxious about it. Later, I gradually matured and began to analyze whether the reason for interrupting the plan was external or my own. If it is external reasons, there is nothing more impatient than this; If it is due to your own reasons (such as laziness and burnout), you can consider changing your plan to lower your expectations while reflecting on yourself, and achieve a more harmonious balance by strengthening self-discipline and partially adjusting your plan.
At the same time, I will give you my review order for reference: intensive reading of textbooks, intensive reading of handouts, analysis of real questions (theoretical methods and business classics have not been finished yet), and finally a surprise attack on the handouts of the new law before the exam. The time dimension is from the end of April to the exam. It gradually increases from 3.4 hours a day, and it is about 7 or 8 hours in July and August. Comprehensive review begins in September (day and night) until the exam 15 minutes.