The policy of comprehensive evaluation of 2 credits for blood donation in a university has caused a lot of discussion.
Li Chao, a freshman, feels novel: "I have given my love and gained credits, killing two birds with one stone, and I want to participate;" However, what if the body is not suitable for blood donation? "
Wang Dong, a junior, questioned: "Blood donation without compensation is a spontaneous love activity, and no conditions should be attached. If blood donation can earn credits, it is not free. "
The school responded: blood donation is not mandatory. This measure is to encourage and guide students to participate in social welfare activities and cultivate students' sense of social responsibility and civic awareness. Two credits for comprehensive evaluation can also be obtained by participating in activities such as teaching, popularizing law and volunteering.
What do you think of this? Please contact the reality of life and talk about your own views.
Ask for a good angle, define the concept, define the style, and draw up a title yourself. Don't copy, and don't copy.
Love needs affirmation.
The policy of donating blood for credits in a university has attracted a lot of discussion. In my opinion, this policy is beyond reproach, because love needs affirmation.
Colleges and universities give students who donate blood for free two credits, which is the same as the immediate family members of unpaid blood donors can use blood for free, and it is an affirmation of this caring behavior. In life, we say "thank you" to those who don't know how to change money, and give a subsidy to those who are brave, which is also an affirmation of caring behavior that conforms to socialist morality.
Why should we affirm the act of love? First of all, loving behavior is the embodiment of high moral level and the important content of socialist moral construction, which should be affirmed. Secondly, affirming loving behavior is a respect for caring people and social moral standards. Thirdly, affirming the act of love is the guarantee that the act of love can be carried out for a long time.
Some people think that it is ok to give spiritual encouragement to the act of love, and giving material rewards will turn "free" into paid, which is blasphemy against love. In fact, these are respectable "gentlemen" who kidnap love from the moral high ground. Imagine that donating blood for free can save lives, which is more important than 2 credits? However, a person's courageous behavior is often unconscious, and he has to take great risks. Is this an equal level compared with the material compensation they may get? The idea that material rewards will make caring behavior "rewarding" will stab love, which is the biggest disrespect for love.
So, how to affirm love? The practice of colleges and universities is undoubtedly a model. In life, we should generously praise the act of love. Even a "well done", "thank you" or even a look of approval can make caring people feel warm inside, let more and more people join in the action of giving love, and make this society warmer and warmer. Enterprises and institutions can formulate policies to reward caring behavior, such as posting letters of commendation, praising in public, and even evaluating the best before evaluating (note: this point was put forward by him, but I used it), promotion and appointment. This can highlight the sense of social responsibility of enterprises and enhance cohesion. Social propaganda agencies should increase the propaganda of loving behavior. Last week, Straits Metropolis Daily made a comprehensive report on Zhangzhou's blood donation to treat newborns. When the public learned of this thrilling rescue operation, they couldn't help praising the caring people in Xia Quan who donated blood and the traffic police in Zhang Quan who escorted the blood collection vehicle. This is a full affirmation of the act of love. The government should vigorously promote the construction of socialist morality and affirm and carry forward caring behavior from the policy level.
The whole society takes action and fully affirms the loving behavior, and our society will be full of positive energy.
analyse
Test analysis: argumentative writing should start with materials, and two starting points can be determined: 1. Love also needs affirmation; 2. Affirming the act of love is a kind of respect. Then consider the writing structure: 1. Put forward arguments from materials; 2. What's this? 3. why; 4. What should I do? 5. Refutation (actually a dialectical point of view. I didn't expect this at first. In the discussion, he only said refutation, not dialectics. I remembered it after reading his article); 6. reiterate the argument. The discussion can be divided into four levels: individual, unit, propaganda organization and government. Finally, it can be written.
Test center: Can write expository, practical and literary articles. The ability level is to express and apply e.