First, I think it is still a family education problem. Obviously, the family condition of this female college student is not bad. While spending a lot of money, she is still applying for poverty relief. I think it's only the national money, and the really poor students in the university are embarrassed to apply because of their inferiority complex. Therefore, someone has to fill in the quota, so most students applying for poverty allowance have superior family conditions. I don't know where they came from. Is the money given by the state reassuring?
Second, the state grants are, in theory, for those students who are academically excellent and have difficulties in life. However, there are loopholes in the application review because students apply independently and classmates supervise each other. So it is easy for people to drill holes. I think the school still needs to work hard in the audit process. You can't believe that students are poor just because you fill out the form. In fact, the meal money brushed out from the student's usual meal card and his daily consumption are clear at a glance, and it is also very simple to check in colleges and universities.
Third, this girl's behavior involves moral issues. While showing off her wealth in a high-profile way, she applied for a student loan and successfully applied. Obviously, the information channel was clear, and she managed to escape. But now is the era of the Internet, and paper can't catch fire after all, so she was destroyed by herself. I don't think this kind of thing needs to be opportunistic and fraudulent, or leave the money to those who really need it. After all, this is the real meaning of poverty allowance. People who don't need it are not at ease to use it. Why?