We have an English exam this morning.
When I got the newspaper, I asked for an extra copy. I want to take the exam with the students and see how many points I can get.
When I was playing listening, I didn't understand a question. Later, I found that my classmates didn't understand either. In other words, this listening problem is a difficult one. Although I chose the right answer, this answer is based on common sense of life.
I wrote this paper very quickly, which should only take ten minutes, so I didn't study the topic carefully during this period.
After the answer came out, I looked it up. It is found that only the score of110-115 can be obtained.
I made two mistakes in reading comprehension, that is, I lost four points. There is also a question about the words used later. I lost two points. Of course, I won't lose points in my composition, but I still calculate it according to the maximum deduction of four points, so the lowest score of this paper is 1 10.
The result seems to surprise me. According to normal reasoning, it should be a perfect score. Actually, it's not. Or we even get lower scores than students sometimes, because some students get full marks in the senior high school entrance examination every year, and we may not get such scores.
So we must realize that we are not necessarily better than students, and students are not necessarily worse than us. The so-called "learning from the law" is like this, so we must have a clear understanding.
What kind of results will students get in the exam?
I think the best score should be 100%. After all, this exam is not too difficult, except for composition.
The topic of this written expression is "we grow together", which seems difficult, but it is actually very simple.
In the fill-in-the-blank part of the test paper, the first section tells the story of helping blind girls. Through the story of herself and the blind girl, she grew up through experience and learned to love …
In fact, this is a very good grafting article. In the examination room, I saw a child graft this article into a composition. This way of thinking is excellent.
In fact, we should simply think about writing. Whether mom or dad grew up with us, someone always wrote, such as people's basic situation, looks, personality, hobbies and their own comments, so the number of words written accounted for more than half.
Then give another example. For example, the mother-child dialogue in the completion dialogue is an excellent example. The son told his mother about his troubles, that his classmates laughed at him for being fat, and that his mother encouraged his son to change himself. Only by changing yourself can we change others. We might as well turn these words from our mother into our own needs and write an article "Nothing is impossible". When we encounter troubles, our mother overcomes herself and encourages herself.
Many times, students' thinking is always solidified. They are used to learning one thing and two things. We should learn to teach improperly in teaching, and if we are flexible, they will learn to change.
It is most suitable to make your own papers.
When a pony crosses a river, only when he has tried can he draw the most correct conclusion.
The premise of our lectures to students is that we have finished and studied this paper carefully. Only in this way can we grasp the most correct direction.
I still suggest that I might as well make my own test paper and test how many points I can get. This result is absolutely valuable.