Reply, that is, reply and excuse. Graduation thesis defense is the last stage of graduation thesis examination. Passing the defense generally means that the diploma and degree certificate are "applicable".
Generally speaking, the defense meeting of colleges and universities will be held at the end of May and the beginning of June, and some graduate students who graduated in winter will be held in1February. But at any time, the process and basic form of defense are basically similar.
Generally speaking, thesis defense is in the classroom or conference room. You stand on the podium with PPT to explain your graduation project (thesis), and then a row of defense judges sit under the stage to ask questions or comment on your thesis. Finally, according to your performance and paper level, grade your defense. The whole journey takes 3-30 minutes, depending on the teacher's subjective grasp.
Simply understand the precautions that can be seen everywhere, so I won't go into details here:
1, fully digest your own papers and take notes in advance;
2. Pay attention to dress, be confident, smile and answer politely;
3. Take a pen in hand and record carefully.
Answer without arguing, arguing is death?
If you have an answer and an argument, it is called an answer. However, many people have summed up the experience that they only answer without arguing, or even argue and die. Why?
In general, after the respondent's statement is completed, the jury will ask the respondent questions and the respondent will answer them. However, respondents generally give up their excuses for the judges' questions or queries, and choose to be very modest, such as "lack of research", "lack of thinking" and "vague understanding", and thank the teachers for their suggestions, saying that they will seriously revise them when they go back.
Why do so many people just answer without arguing?
A: Safe!
1, show humility, after all, you are a student and others are teachers;
2, please the judges and teachers, and reduce the negative evaluation of the paper with a good attitude;
3. Even if it is an excuse, the final result is generally that the teacher wins and the students compromise;
4, no longer give the judges the opportunity to ask questions, and directly block the judges' mouths by compromise.
Why is there a saying that "one argument will kill"?
A: A lesson from the past!
Except that the quality of the thesis is particularly rubbish, most students who fail in the general defense argue with the teacher on the defense field. Many students have the habit of saying "no", and so does the defense. They habitually don't acknowledge any opinions of others positively, which easily causes teachers' desire for "education". The teacher will think that you are kind enough to give you some advice. Not only will you not accept it, but you will also retort that your attitude is not good. Compared with other "very modest" students, who do you care about?
In addition, arguments are easy to make people emotional, so some students use "you" at first, and then directly say "teacher, you are wrong". This attitude affects not only one teacher, but all the judges.
You don't have to die in an argument, what you need is skill!
Students who only answer but don't argue belong to the safe type, and their on-site performance is quite satisfactory, but they are far from excellent; Students who defend themselves blindly are stupid X-type, and their live performance is too eye-catching and even contradicts the language, which is the first choice for teachers to allocate "shooting places"; Smart students, combined with defense.
For example:
Teacher: I think you should explain A before B. The logical order of this paragraph needs to be adjusted.
Steady student: Thank you, teacher. I really didn't notice it here. You're right. I will seriously revise it when I go back. (Directly seal the teacher! I may think to myself: @ #%&; @ *%, change a girl! The teacher thought: well, it's good! )
Silly student X: No, teacher, my paragraph corresponds to the previous logic. It would be wrong to change it. (thinking to myself: well, that's what I said! The teacher thought: the teacher next to me supports me, so I lose face. Then I silently wrote down the name of TA. )
Clever student: Thank you, teacher. Maybe I haven't considered this place comprehensively enough. I just thought about ... (used here to defend), but I really didn't think about the problem you said. After I go down, I will carefully examine and revise it. Thank you teacher! In this way, you not only make excuses, but also block the teacher with compromise, so that the teacher will feel that you are familiar with your article and can explain it so clearly. This is a plus item. Moreover, I didn't deny the teacher's suggestion, and I didn't swallow it. )