1, change when you say it, and change when you say it. Many students reported that at the seminar on exemption, the admissions teacher emphasized the policy of scholarships and bluntly said that every student would have a scholarship for freshmen in senior high school.

However, in fact, not only many students can't get the "high amount", but even some students can't get the freshman scholarship. Naked deception has become the direct cause of most freshmen's extreme anger.

2. distinguish, who can be nobler than who? Looking at the policy carefully, we actually don't see many clues, and there is no clear standard for "well-known high-level universities" and "key universities".

Because of this, in practice, Nankai directly listed our school as a "well-known high-level university" and gave preferential treatment to students excluded from our school; 985 students are also given a higher quota (1 10,000) to be tilted and cared for; And some students of 2 1 1 were left out in the cold and barely got the lowest scholarship.

"Since we are all admitted, Nankai thinks that we are all equally excellent. Why should new scholarships be treated differently now? It is ok to score according to the results of the exemption, but what does it mean to score according to the schools that are exempt from the examination? " A "Sao operation" made many students feel discriminated against, and also detonated everyone's anger.

3. With a little burning, more contradictions are aroused. In many online discussions and disputes, the focus of attention has spread from the scholarship itself to other issues: administrative efficiency, logistical support, high prices ... The "silent majority" has also begun to join this debate and discussion. In my humble opinion, there is more hidden behind a scholarship debate.

"Who doesn't want his alma mater to be better and stronger?"

In fact, in addition to anger, the feelings of many Nankai two alma mater are becoming more and more complicated:

"Although I don't believe that words such as discrimination and deception are linked to my alma mater, I still hope that the official can give a formal response and statement. After all, a century-old prestigious school still needs this tolerance and inheritance. "

"Not suffering from widowhood, but suffering from inequality. This one or two thousand is not a big number. I earned it after coming out to work for a month or two, but I just want a statement, a truth and a response. "

"I am very reluctant, but I must admit that if the policy formulation and implementation are so foolhardy, I am very worried about my future development. It has been sung badly recently, and now there are these moths, which is uncomfortable. "

"Nankai has built itself into a well-known high-level university with Qingbei, but this scholarship review shows that Nankai still has a long way to go from a well-known high-level university."

When we talk about our alma mater, we always feel proud. After all, this is where we nourish and grow. But for some flaws, we will "hate iron and not produce steel" and have mixed feelings.

The people who ate melons may have been watching the Nankai Scholarship incident, but it didn't make too much noise. However, more Nankai people, whether angry or trying to explain, must be extremely uncomfortable-who doesn't want their alma mater to be better and stronger? Perhaps "criticism" itself is also a good thing. Taking "criticism" as a mirror, Nankai can go higher and further.