One. Proceeding from the national conditions of China and the reality of education development. As we all know, western universities mainly rely on social support. Different from western community schools, China's current institutions of higher learning are mainly public schools with limited resources and financial resources. Moreover, at present, when we haven't fully popularized primary and secondary education, we have invested a lot of limited resources in higher education, and the efforts made by the state can't be well rewarded. Why should the other party be proud of your generosity? And as far as the current situation in China is concerned, we have achieved the quantitative goal in the quantity of education, but the quality is far from enough. Therefore, we should optimize the existing educational structure not only in quantity, but also in quality.

2. From the contradiction between talent supply and social demand. Judging from the current social situation in China, the demand for higher education talents in China's economic development is limited, but a large number of secondary professional and technical talents are needed. The expansion of higher education enrollment is not only unfavorable to the development of higher education, but also unfavorable to economic development. And now most of our students are "I" type talents, that is, the general comprehensive level, but they lack "T" type talents with professional skills, which can better serve the society. On the premise of providing students with a good basic level, leniency can not only help students develop their personality, but also enable them to get in touch with opportunities from more channels. Finally, with a comprehensive and reasonable multi-evaluation system, more talents can walk out of high-walled schools and go to the society, serve the society better in various ways and reflect the value of higher education.

Third, from the educational model itself. Tolerance means that students with different knowledge levels study in the same school, so teachers must lower their teaching standards in order to take care of students with poor foundation, so that teachers' teaching quality and students' learning quality cannot be improved, but colleges and universities should use a strict standard to assess students. Not to mention the contradiction of combining leniency with severity, even if it is possible, what is the difficulty coefficient? A good beginning is half the battle. In contrast, our strict schedule is based on a broad schedule, which not only ensures a good start, but also promotes the improvement of quality, making it much safer to operate.