Discipline evaluation refers to the overall level evaluation of the first-level discipline. The purpose of evaluation is to serve the overall situation, universities and society. The project evaluation lasted for one year. According to the principle of voluntary application to participate in the evaluation, objective evaluation and subjective evaluation are combined. The required data include public data published by relevant government departments and social organizations and materials submitted by participating units.
Through the publicity and verification of relevant data, subject experts, government departments and business people are invited to make subjective evaluation, and the final evaluation results are formed on this basis. The purpose of publishing the evaluation results is to provide objective information for the participating units to understand the current situation of the discipline, promote the construction of the connotation of the discipline, and improve the quality of postgraduate training and degree awarding; Provide reference for students to choose disciplines and majors; At the same time, it is also convenient for all sectors of society to understand the discipline construction of schools and scientific research institutions.
Subject evaluation criteria:
There are four criteria for discipline evaluation, namely, faculty and resources, personnel training quality, scientific research level, social service and discipline reputation. These indicators are related to the teaching level of the subject and objectively reflect the quality and educational effect of the subject. The whole process of subject evaluation is also rigorous. The whole process mainly includes three parts.
One is to conduct a large-scale online questionnaire survey of students and employers, and then check the information to eliminate duplicate false data. The second is to invite peer experts to evaluate the target discipline from these four indicators. The third is to invite peer experts, government officials and overseas peer experts to make subjective evaluation, and finally form the final result on these bases. The fourth round of discipline evaluation adopts the method of grading and publishing the results, and divides the top 70% disciplines into nine grades according to the overall level of disciplines and scores.