Hello, whether the civil rights and interests protected by tort law include creditor's rights is controversial in theory and practice. If the creditor's rights are protected, the tort liability will be infinitely enlarged in some cases. For example, you hit a singer who signed a contract in a bar, and the bar failed to fulfill the contract because of the singer's injury. If the tort liability law also protects creditor's rights, then the loss of the bar also needs your compensation. This is obviously unfair. However, if you and the owner of that bar are competitors, and you know that the loss of the bar exceeds the money you need to compensate, so you deliberately hit the singer, then it is unfair for the bar that its loss cannot be compensated.

Therefore, there are also some views that tort liability law should selectively protect creditor's rights. For example, the Tort Liability Law, edited by Dr. Wang Zhu, an associate professor at Sichuan University Law School, holds that the general provisions of tort liability can also be applied to intentional infringement of creditor's rights. Understanding and Application of Tort Liability Law, edited by Xi Xiaoming, vice president of the Supreme People's Court, holds that the relative right is generally not suitable for protection by tort liability law, but if the injurer maliciously infringes on others' rights while knowing that others' relative rights exist, he should admit that tort liability is established. (that is, the case of the second example I cited above)

Moreover, the examination questions of 20 10 in the judicial examination also reflect the spirit that the third party needs compensation for malicious infringement of creditor's rights. I hope this will answer your question:)