In the past, it was naturally a good thing for professors to let students ask and answer questions.
In contrast, I personally think that a better way is to respect students' interests and set up a mathematics consulting room, which is run by seniors or young people.
Teachers, in fixed class hours, ask questions about subjects in lower grades at will.
First, many foreign schools have such settings. I don't know about China, but math is really not like this.
I just had a chat with my little brother.
He told me that a brother CS, also a member of Wu Da University, said such a thing. The purpose of learning mathematics is to brush the questions, and you can work it out by brushing more questions.
Performance. You should be worthy of the investment of the country. The later you learn mathematics, the more like truth;
Lovers will cheat you, friends will betray you, but not math.
Mathematics can't be, and this rule is not only useless, but also tm may have side effects.
To really learn mathematics well, it is extremely necessary to understand and have good mathematical intuition.
At least my experience is that to understand such an abstract thing as mathematics, one prerequisite is that the brain should be in a relatively relaxed state.
For example, what I often encounter is that after sitting at my desk for an hour, I still don't understand something and go out to accompany my wife.
Take a turn, or drive to buy a dish, or take a nap, and I suddenly came up with it.
The inspiration is a bit metaphysical. It's hard to say when it will happen, but it's definitely not the time to be nervous.
I think forcing people to study there will kill inspiration and intuition with great probability.
People have free time to sleep more, make a girlfriend, and it is easier to make achievements if they are not sure.
Second, so, in the future, let people who study mathematics take charge of the department of mathematics, at least there will be no violations of mathematical laws. And not only mathematics, but also other subjects should not do this.
When you go to college, you should learn to control your time by yourself.
But some people have poor self-control and may fall behind.
But at this time, we should give priority to persuasion, not tough intervention. None of us want to see this result. The most basic principle of an activity in a university should be voluntary. In addition to the most basic student obligations
In addition, most of the assignments are criticized by students, such as meaningless meetings, radio exercises and so on, but because of this.
It has been a practice for many years, and it won't take much time, so there is no need to criticize it too sharply.
Let's think from the other side, what kind of clapping activities. The most popular activity for students in the School of Mathematics is discussion class.
You can participate according to your own interests and needs and learn the corresponding knowledge. The college provides help in terms of venues, materials and even teachers.
this
This kind of activity is a good activity, because it will certainly help those who need it, but it will not help those who don't need it.
Any additional losses and troubles. In other words, it is very important for anyone, especially all students, not just all leaders, to carry out an activity.
If there is no negative income, it is a good activity. We can discuss how many positive benefits it can bring to judge how good it is, but no negative benefits is a basic principle.
Third, looking back, let's look at what activities are bad and what activities are mandatory and can't achieve positive benefits for most people.
This kind of activity is not uncommon. We generally call it formalism. Why should we carry out this activity? Because students' participation can give leaders
Bring benefits, leaders can brag about it as a political achievement, for example, some departments in the engineering department have morning exercises and evening self-study, and your school still has it.
I dare not say anything more formalistic, and I believe everyone knows it very well.
Some people defend these bad activities like this: "Anyway, you don't participate in the activities, just playing with your mobile phone or sleeping, and you think this activity can be rewarding." Why not? " Even if you don't want to ask for leave, it's over, and it's not that you won't be asked for leave. "
This kind of excuse is full of dad's flavor, because everyone's needs are different, and this difference should be respected. Some people are not suitable for getting up early, some people like to study alone, and some people need an evening of entertainment to save their souls on the verge of collapse.
But you think that only your planned college life is correct, and everything that doesn't follow my plan is not good. It's not even management, it's management.
This is meaningless. ?
At this point, you retreated to the last floor. You said it was a big deal to ask for leave, and it was a big deal to come here to play mobile phones. What happened? However, why? rely on
What time can I have at my disposal? Do I need to ask for leave after you arranged such an activity without my consent?
Why can I play with my mobile phone in the dormitory, but I have to play in the classroom? Why for your wishful thinking and the good looks of the leaders, I
Patiently cooperate with your moral kidnapping of "for your own good and for everyone's good"?
You can argue in two ways.
Fourth, the first one is that we didn't say compulsory. But freshmen don't know that college life should be
It's up to you to decide. When the college is no longer an authority, will it be possible to hold evening self-study, which is understood as compulsory?
Many people's misunderstandings? In fact, it doesn't matter that freshmen don't know a lot of formalism in this college, but it's "ok"
What's the difference between you and kidnapping if you have to participate in a big flow and atmosphere?
The second way is that you can criticize me for not taking part in all group activities for my own benefit.
No, I don't think it is unacceptable to transfer personal interests and rights appropriately, but obviously there are voluntary forms of activities and propaganda, not for doing more.
People who take part in self-study that they don't like will not help those who originally like collective self-study, but will only bring achievements and achievements to leaders.
When you love face, you are either stupid or bad.
Fifth, finally, why do we have to hold a well-developed learning seminar and expand it into the so-called self-study for all? You can figure it out with your head.
Wuhan Mathematics University has always been a place that respects students' people-oriented, at least relatively speaking. I can't bear to see this place become a laboratory for conceited people and a show for credit inviters. One should have basic empathy.