(1) gives a new justification. It is necessary to know that the rejection letters given by the admissions officer have been carefully considered for a long time, and the first rejection letter is enough to prove that the application materials are invalid. Therefore, the appellant should give new and revised contents. For example, personal difficulties during the application period, miscalculation of school grades, and significant improvement in academic level and its proof. Attach as much evidence and documents as possible to convince.

(2) Be polite and positive, don't complain, don't complain about the rejection letter of the admissions officer, and don't complain about the negative impact of any uncontrollable factors on the application. These are meaningless messages. Giving reasons is not the same as making excuses. "Give reasons" means that although the previous application exposed shortcomings, it gave a positive side after improvement.

(3) The language is simple and direct, and the length of the appeal letter should not be too long. Because the admissions officer has already had a certain impression on you during the first application, there is no need to repeat your basic situation. Just give your new ideas and reasons directly. However, the subject line and title before the letter, the appropriate ending, signature and other formal words can not be omitted.

The writing of the thesis.

The primary consideration is whether the school accepts the complaint. Read the decision letter and the admissions section of the university website carefully for any information about the appeal decision. In official website, some universities will make it clear that they will not accept appeals, such as Columbia University; The accepted university will set certain conditions and will tell you how to appeal. For example, the University of California at Berkeley made it clear that appeals are not encouraged and can only be appealed if there is really important new information; The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is only allowed to appeal if it violates the admissions policy or procedural errors. In general, the higher the ranking, the stricter the control of complaints, because these universities have been very strict in reviewing the results of letter rejection. If the university doesn't allow complaints at all, then all the suggestions below are useless. Secondly, can you give better materials or reasons than before? For example, what other major awards or honors have you won? Did you just get a much better score than the one originally submitted? Did the high school provide incorrect information on the report card? Are the application materials submitted for the first time incomplete due to uncontrollable reasons? However, if the ACT score is improved 1 point or GPA is increased from 3.73 to 3.76, then it is difficult to successfully appeal such a small change. In other words, you need important new information to enhance your advantage, otherwise your attraction will be meaningless. Anger, frustration or unfair treatment are not grounds for appeal.