Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - # # Dr. Jiao Tong University showed the ratio of male to female in graduation photo.
# # Dr. Jiao Tong University showed the ratio of male to female in graduation photo.
Later, he found that as long as he didn't talk too deeply, there was actually no problem. At first, the girls' girlfriends group was against it, and they felt that the gap between the two was too big, so the boys were particularly hard. All kinds of people invited them to dinner, trying to express themselves, and then a magical plot happened. The attitude of the girlfriends group has gradually changed, thinking that academic qualifications are not that important, as long as they are good to girls and motivated. After the girlfriends group is completed, the final and ultimate problem is to get rid of the woman's parents.

Dr. Jiao Tong University, let's take a look at the sex ratio in graduation photo.

Shanghai gives Tsinghua Peking University undergraduates a "green light" to settle down and see their origins? One test is for life!

The competition for talents in various places is still being staged, and Shanghai has also begun to screen top students. The settlement policy of points triggered a heated discussion among netizens, and "one test for life" was once again mentioned. What do you think of this matter?

Recently, Shanghai promulgated the "2065438+2008 Grading Method for Non-Shanghai University Graduates to Apply for Local Household Registration and Employment in Shanghai".

Among the many conditions for settling in Shanghai, one reads as follows:

Taking Peking University and Tsinghua University as the pilot, we will explore the establishment of a green channel policy for fresh graduates who are domestic high-level universities and meet the basic application conditions.

Among them, it is clear that undergraduate graduates from Qingbei can directly settle in Shanghai, which means that those who graduated from Tsinghua Peking University with a master's degree or a doctor's degree still need points to reach the standard before they can settle down. This news has caused many netizens to re-discuss the saying that "one exam is for life".

0 1

Social Reality: Famous School Label

Qingbei graduates can take the green channel and settle directly in Shanghai. It is conceivable that the list of green universities in Shanghai will gradually expand, but it will definitely be limited to a very small number of universities. They are all college students, and all walks of life will be measured by the famous school label. Although it is not correct, it is a reality. The affirmation and recognition of famous schools by society, including absolute government departments, will inevitably promote the pursuit of famous schools by students and parents, and will also promote various utilitarian pursuits of education, such as exam-oriented education ... Can this be solved by the education department alone? —— Chen Zhiwen, editor-in-chief of China Education Online

02

Birth discrimination: undergraduate is king

A rising tide lifts all boats. Now that you are all college students, it depends on your background, that is, which university. Xi has no capital, so it needs a technical secondary school diploma. Shanghai has capital, only famous schools, not only Qingbei, but also Qingbei undergraduate. This is not surprising. In 20 17, Tsinghua enrolled 3,700 undergraduates and 7,000 postgraduates, and so did Peking University. If Beijing Medical University is added, Peking University will recruit tens of thousands of graduate students a year, then the settlement restriction is "Qingbei undergraduates". The gold content of undergraduate and graduate students in famous universities is really different. The admission rate of Harvard undergraduate application is about 5%, and the master's degree can be as high as 50% or even 60%, which is the fundamental reason why many people can only flaunt their Harvard master's degree. Most importantly, we have always criticized employment discrimination and the practice of "looking at birth". What should the Shanghai government do if it openly discriminates against fertility? ! —— Chen Zhiwen, editor-in-chief of China Education Online

03

Local universities: Fudan University and Jiaotong University are very wronged.

Some netizens complain that this is discrimination against local college students in Fudan, Tongji and Jiaotong University, but is this really the case?

Although the "Measures" did not specify that Fudan and Jiaotong University graduates can directly settle in Shanghai, I calculated according to the integral requirements:

Fudan University and Jiaotong University belong to the first category of universities and postgraduate training units, 15 points. Bachelor degree 2 1 point; The cumulative scores of graduate students and doctors are higher. If you have the highest academic qualifications in Shanghai, you can add 2 points to study in Shanghai.

These three scores add up to 38 points, and the new rule is that 72 points can be settled in Shanghai, that is, students only need to earn 34 points to reach the standard. This is not a difficult requirement. As long as you are good enough, it is not a dream to settle in Shanghai.

04

Talent War: Unbalanced Regional Development

Some netizens pointed out that the talent introduction policy is unfair to underdeveloped areas and intensifies the gap between regions.

05

Strength and heart: settlement does not mean having a house.

06

Good strategy: knowledge changes fate

Many netizens said: There is no absolute fairness in the world. Instead of complaining, it is better to try to be the biased party in unfairness. If I had known this policy earlier, I would have studied hard.

The following is the full text of "20 18 Measures for Grading Local Household Registration of Non-Shanghai College Graduates Applying for Employment in Shanghai":

Female doctors love technical secondary school boys, why is no one optimistic?

This matter should start with a news that a boy with a technical secondary school education fell in love with a female doctor of medicine from Xi Jiaotong University. The two met at a dinner party. At first, the boys were quite inferior, and felt that their academic qualifications were not comparable to each other, so they dared not talk to the professional direction when chatting with the woman. Later, he found that as long as he didn't talk too deeply, there was actually no problem. At first, the girls' girlfriends group was against it, and they felt that the gap between the two was too big, so the boys were particularly hard. All kinds of people invited them to dinner, trying to express themselves, and then a magical plot happened. The attitude of the girlfriends group has gradually changed, thinking that academic qualifications are not that important, as long as they are good to girls and motivated. After the girlfriends group is completed, the final and ultimate problem is to get rid of the woman's parents. When we met for the first time, the woman's parents were also very obscure, saying that the man had commendable courage and clearly disagreed. Parents were still stricter in choosing a son-in-law than their girlfriend.

So there was this news, and the man turned to the media, hoping to arrange a short trip for the woman and her parents, and then, show himself well. On the trip, the boys really worked hard to express themselves, basically just writing the words "I am good to her" on their faces. Seeing that her daughter was so moved, her parents softened their attitude and said that as long as her daughter liked it, she basically reluctantly agreed.

In fact, this is a very simple story, but the information inside is still quite large. At first, both my girlfriend and parents were dissatisfied with the academic qualifications of boys, which were considered as great shortcomings. But why did the other party selectively ignore academic qualifications after a performance, and a real shortcoming disappeared like this? Maybe all this sounds reasonable, but don't you think there is a little irrationality in it? Including many people have many standards when they are not in contact. Once they get in touch, it seems that all those standards are irrelevant. Ask yourself, is it the same?

Education is not a problem, and distance is not a problem. Of course, when we talk about academic qualifications, we must first exclude other irrelevant variables such as wealth, appearance, family and even luck, otherwise things will become very complicated and there is no point in discussing them. We say that we can't talk about different academic qualifications and different viewpoints, but have you ever wondered why we can't talk about different viewpoints? To explain this problem, we must first explain another problem. Why should we go to school for education? There are many reasons. In my opinion, the most important thing is to teach us the way to know and understand the world through schools. Simply put, it is the formation of cognition, and the process of cognition formation is the process of selectively inputting external information and systematically processing it. For example, I don't think it matters at all whether you can type the root number or not. Most people have never played the radical sign in their lives, and it is not surprising that they may never use it. No matter how fast you type the root number, it won't help you. Why waste time learning a useless one?

The key is here, it is actually useful. Where does cognitive ability come from? A large part of it comes from learning. The more we learn, the stronger our cognitive ability will be, which will subtly enhance our cognitive ability. This is how the brain develops. What are the different cognitive abilities? Will affect the way we look at things. For example, in the book "The Essence of Film", the author said that a director made a short film of 10 minutes to shoot tall buildings with urban scenery. The bar was brightly lit, and then the director took the film to Africa to show the indigenous people who were still in an extremely barbaric state. They wore fur mats. The director thought that they would be shocked by modern civilization after watching the movie, but what he didn't expect was that after watching the movie, everyone was there to discuss one thing, that is, there was a chicken in the movie. This is the problem. The director himself doesn't remember shooting a chicken in his film, then pulling the tab frame by frame and finally finding a passing chicken in a corner, so they only knew the chicken in the film for nearly ten minutes, and everything else was a background wall for them. On the other hand, how can an indigenous person know the scenery of these cities? In fact, it is learning and education. Let's think about it. If you sit there and watch the same movie with an aborigine, you crave the city scenery, he loves chickens, your mind flashes, he loves chickens, you praise human civilization, and he loves chickens. What does this example show? It shows that we know the decisions we think we see, but in fact we are often the opposite. What we know will determine what we see. The aborigines are right, and so are you, but this is the cognitive difference.

Of course, this is only an extreme situation. You have to understand that the actual situation is definitely not that exaggerated. Many places can still be consistent. For example, both people think that a painting is beautiful and the scenery is beautiful. One said sunset and lonely Qi Fei, and the other said I was really beautiful. Do you think this is consistent, but it is completely consistent? Of course, I don't mean to despise. Although this slight inconsistency will not affect the basic life of two people, this is the problem. You certainly don't want to find someone to live a basic life with. We receive a lot of information every day, day after day, which will eventually form our three views after our cognitive processing. So what is behind the academic qualifications? To a large extent, it is cognitive ability. So this can explain why different academic qualifications and three views will be different. We all receive information first, then process it through cognition, and finally form an idea. If the cognitive gap is too big, then the concept will definitely be very different. This is something that two people can't see when they first got together, so in fact, we can draw a conclusion now. If you want to find someone with similar views who has not been in contact for a long time, I think it is a simple and rude but effective way to look at academic qualifications. Of course, in addition to the three views, another problem inevitably brought about by the educational background gap is that the starting point of income will be different, which should be needless to say.

Actually, I don't like things that emphasize hierarchy too much, but as I said above. This is the case if all irrelevant variables are excluded. Education does bring some differences, even gaps. What happens if all the unrelated variables are added up? For example, YCY only went to junior high school, but in her present situation, I think it is no problem for her to marry a doctor. So wealth, fame, background and looks are all variables, no problem, but there is only one of these variables. I think it is a problem, that is, "being good to one person".

So is the technical secondary school boy we mentioned at the beginning. No matter how late it is, he will take the girl home and take her family on a trip. He rented a yard for the night, only two rooms, and then gave the room to girls and parents, and went downstairs to live in a teahouse, only to be bitten by mosquitoes. Before dawn in the morning, before the woman's home gets up, the boys buy them breakfast and so on. Do you say like or love? As a girl, I think you have reason to be moved and even look forward to meeting such a boy. But this is what I think is unreasonable behind the whole thing. It is a good way to make up for the gap in academic qualifications. What's your education? It is a relatively stable attribute, such as family experience. These are all stable attributes. If you have a high degree and my family is good, I don't think there is anything wrong with it, but being kind to a person is an act, and the behavior is unstable. If a person cares about you today, he may tell you tomorrow that I have no feelings for you. I believe that girls will have a deeper understanding of this.

So it is really unreasonable to use behavior to make up for attributes. Moreover, we can even get a heartfelt idea. Since it is good for a person, it is unstable behavior. Then we will take care of each other. For example, we may have different attitudes towards different people. So is a person good to you because he is good or because you are good? I have never denied the value in behavior, and I have never said that the effort in behavior is wrong. I just want to say that the value exchange between attributes is relatively safe, and the contribution of behavior can be rewarded by behavior. Of course, all this is based on a long-term relationship, and that's probably it.

Finally, a revelation can be drawn. If you want to find people with excellent attributes, both men and women should strive to improve their attributes, not their family and background, which cannot be changed. We should focus on those places that we can still change, such as education, identity, social status and even appearance, among which education may be a fairer one.