Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - How to treat "college students send dirty clothes home to wash into a new business"
How to treat "college students send dirty clothes home to wash into a new business"
Some college students once again lost the opportunity to "wash clothes independently" and handle personal affairs independently. "Sending dirty clothes home by courier" actually deprives college students of "independent consciousness cultivation" and "rare" growth opportunities. Such "express delivery" has consciously or unconsciously become a "poison" that harms the healthy growth of college students. As the old saying goes, "Born in sorrow and died in happiness", what are the life, personality and social responsibility of these college students who want to send their dirty clothes home by express delivery, and how do they face the cruel society?

Competition can't help worrying.

It seems that "dirty clothes come home by express delivery" conforms to the market demand, which is essentially a negative impact on college students' education, and inadvertently becomes an "accomplice" who hurts college students' independent self and personality. Therefore, from the perspective of being responsible for the next generation, the author thinks that it is better to be cautious in this kind of business of "raising lazy people" and raising arrogant children. This is related to corporate social responsibility and the long-term development of a nation in the future. It is better not to make this money. In fact, operators and enterprises should have more social responsibilities for the needs of some special industries and special groups. For example, the laws of China strictly prohibit Internet cafes from accepting minors, and the laws of some western countries prohibit "selling alcohol" to minors, all of which are special protections for the healthy growth of teenagers. Practice has proved that it is also necessary. Although college students are already adults, they are only "adults" in age, and most of them are not "adults" in the true sense. Therefore, society, enterprises and families should create more and more suitable atmosphere, encourage them to actively cultivate the spirit of self-reliance and self-improvement, and give them as many opportunities for exercise and growth as possible.

□ Zhu Changjun

Liu said that a large part of the express delivery business in colleges and universities comes from students sending home clothes that have been accumulated for a period of time. Has it really developed into a relatively common new business? How big is "a large part"? At least from some media surveys and online public opinion, this phenomenon is rare and even less common. Faced with such a vague information, it is an overreaction to point the finger at students' low self-care ability and independence, or even to judge them by equating them with group impressions.

Then, from the case, how should college students treat sending dirty clothes home? As adults spend their parents' money to continue their studies, even their own clothes need to be saved and sent home for their parents to wash. It really shouldn't appear. According to some previous cases, we found that some college students lack self-care ability. But according to common sense and objective reality, this phenomenon can't be very common. Even among college students, there are very few people who agree with this concept and behavior. Therefore, if we simply regard the case as another example of the label of the "Beat Generation" group and infer the deficiency of the educational concept, it is not only suspected of setting goals indiscriminately, but also easy to cause more intergenerational barriers.

To say the least, it's really too much to send dirty clothes home, but at present,

Generally, universities will set up coin-operated washing machine in student dormitories, and it is common for students to "buy" this service. At the same time, college students' demands for installing air conditioners in dormitories are also strong year by year. So, is there any difference between this kind of behavior and the "hard struggle" that we have been preaching? It must be admitted that students' choice of consumption patterns will be different due to different family conditions and their own personality, but it is understandable as long as they can. After all, the times are changing, and consumption concepts and social conditions are changing. If the evaluation always stays in the distant past, isn't it a pedantic stereotype?

It is conceivable that with the progress of the times, there will be more and more similar "new businesses" and "new phenomena". However, I really don't want to see this kind of pan-moral judgment impulse burning at one point come out again. There will be "exceptions" in every era and every group. It is obviously biased to evaluate a group with such "exceptions". It is also an outdated thinking to rely on some big and improper "big talk" and examine it with an outdated moral magnifying glass. Facing the growing generation and changing times, our evaluation criteria and vision really need to be updated in time.