school spirit
Patriotism, unity and civilization forge ahead
Teaching style
Highly respected, hardworking and democratic, seeking truth from facts.
style of study
Respect teachers, strictly observe discipline and strive for innovation.
Idea of running a school
Everything is for students, for all students, for all students.
Tang Yunnan, former president of the affiliated middle school of Xida University, misappropriated educational donations.
It is understood that cases in the middle school affiliated to Xida University have been reported by the masses many times, and relevant departments have also investigated them many times. In July 2007, the superior appointed the case to the Nanning Railway Transport Procuratorate for investigation. Before Tang Yunnan case was pronounced, seven defendants, including former secretary Xu, four former vice presidents and two former middle-level cadres, had been sentenced. In this case, the public prosecutor accused Tang Yunnan of committing corruption and accepting bribes, and listed 13 criminal facts, involving a total amount of more than one million yuan. In the judgment of May 22, Nanning Railway Transport Court found that Tang Yunnan embezzled "educational donations" alone or in collusion with others, totaling more than 350,000 yuan, with personal corruption amounting to more than 270,000 yuan and bribery of 393,000 yuan. The court also found that Tang Yunnan played a major role in the corruption of * * * and was the principal offender. On this basis, Tang Yunnan was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 18 years for corruption, bribery and several crimes, and his property was confiscated 200,000 yuan, while continuing to recover the remaining money of more than 640,000 yuan. In the fact that Tang Yunnan was found guilty of corruption and bribery by the court, almost all the money involved came from donations collected by the school from parents of students.
Comment on Darkness
According to the regulations, the school collects donations from parents of students, which need to be discussed within the school. Parents of students directly hand them over to the school finance department or financial account, and there is no need for school leaders to come forward. So, how did Tang Yunnan avoid the public eye and put these donations into his pocket? Since 2004, the middle school attached to Xida University has organized students to take entrance examinations when enrolling students (except students from Xida University and related units). Candidates who fail to reach the score line have to pay donations ranging from 6,543,800+0,000 to 50,000 yuan. Huang, the sentenced vice-principal, said that according to the regulations, which student can reduce or exempt educational donations must be discussed by members of the school leadership, but Tang Yunnan never accepts the supervision of other leaders. In July, 2007, one of Tory's parents found Tang Yunnan, hoping that his son could attend the middle school attached to Xida University. Neither student has reached the admission mark. Tang Yunnan told Li that he had approved the admission of the two students, but he had to pay 36,000 yuan and 30,000 yuan in donations. After Li handed the money to Tang Yunnan, two students successfully entered the school, but the school did not receive the donation. It turned out that Tang Yunnan wrote on the Pitiao that the educational donation was for 0 yuan. In fact, he put more than 60,000 yuan into his pocket. The court found that Tang Yunnan used a similar method to embezzle the donation of 1.6 million yuan from the parents of students during the enrollment period in July 2007.
Take the lead in eating "Tang monk meat"
The accounts of the middle school attached to Xida University are managed by the Finance Department of Xida University. However, the school did not hand in all the donations, but deposited a large sum of money into the private accounts of several vice presidents or transferred it to the accounts of the canteen attached to Xida University, which became a veritable "small treasury". According to the confessions of other people involved in the case, this "small treasury" has become the "Tang monk meat" led by the school, and it is the principal Tang Yunnan who takes the lead in eating "meat". Tang Yunnan's method of withdrawing money from the "small treasury" was to falsely report invoices and impersonate. In September, 2005, Tang Yunnan handed over an invoice of 20,000 yuan to Vice President Zhou for reimbursement in the "small treasury". However, the normal financial expenses of the middle school attached to Xida University are reimbursed by the Finance Department of Xida University. When Zhou saw the clue, he discussed it with the secretary Xu and several other vice presidents, and also wanted to get some benefits. After Tang Yunnan agreed, several people set the amount of "reimbursement" according to the level, and then each person found an invoice to offset the account, and * * * embezzled the donation of 654.38+ 10,000 yuan. Since then, Tang Yunnan has used the same method to "reimburse" from time to time, and others have followed suit. In the past two years, the fake invoices used to offset accounts have accumulated several kilograms. In order to avoid future trouble, Tang Yunnan repeatedly urged Zhou and others to burn invoices. One day in April 2006, Zhou and others burned all these fake invoices. In July 2007, in order to cope with the investigation, Tang Yunnan summoned Xu, Zhou and others to a hotel in Nanning to make false account books, and falsely reported the embezzled money as the expenses of faculty studying abroad during the summer vacation. The court found that during the two years from 2005 to 2007, Tang Yunnan embezzled 1.9 million yuan from the small treasury by means of false invoices, of which1.0 million yuan was embezzled by individuals.
Carefully designed to get kickbacks
Tang Yunnan's accusation of accepting bribes originated from a transaction between the High School Attached to Xida University and an electronic equipment factory in Guilin. The prosecution alleged that from 2004 to 2005, taking advantage of his position as principal, Tang Yunnan used donations to purchase multimedia audio-visual education, network engineering and other equipment for the middle school attached to Xida University, and received kickbacks of several hundred thousand yuan from an electronic equipment factory in Guilin in the name of "inspection fee". It was found through trial by the court that Tang Mou and Chen Mou of Nanning Office of an electronic equipment factory in Guilin contacted Tang Yunnan about this matter. They said that at that time, the factory quoted 46 thousand yuan for each set of equipment, and Tang Yunnan agreed to buy 20 sets, but offered a rebate. After Chen Mou reported to the factory for approval, the reserve price of each set of equipment was determined to be 35,000 yuan, and the extra 1. 1 0,000 yuan was returned to Tang Yunnan in the name of "inspection fee". After learning about this, Tang Yunnan proposed to buy 44 sets of equipment in two school years. In order to hide people's eyes and ears, Tang Yunnan asked the Electronic Equipment General Factory to organize manufacturers to bid, and the manufacturers sent four staff members to participate in the bidding as other manufacturers and factories according to Tang Yunnan's meaning. Finally, the Electronic Equipment General Factory successfully won the bid according to the predetermined scheme. After the two sides signed the contract, Tang organized personnel to collect donations from the parents of the students as a reward. After the two collect money every day, they will calculate the rebate amount in proportion, and Tang will send it to the designated place to Tang Yunnan. In two years, they gave Tang Yunnan a kickback of more than 390,000 yuan. In court, Tang Yunnan completely denied the accusation. He said he didn't know Don at all. Tang's statement is only one-sided, and it is framed against him. It's Don's girlfriend, and her words are not to be trusted. The testimony of other witnesses came from Tang and Chen, and they just misrepresented it. However, the prosecutor found out that after the incident, Tang Yunnan called and sent a text message to tell Tang that the relevant departments were investigating the "inspection fee" and asked Tang to leave Guangxi as soon as possible. The court held that the information contradicted Tang Yunnan's statement, proving that he was deliberately concealing the truth.
Play hard and get a "calm" principal.
From investigation to trial, Tang Yunnan himself refused to plead guilty. He denied any alleged facts. Tang Yunnan was finally convicted, which was locked by the interlocking chain of evidence. One of the most important links is that he colluded with relevant personnel through SMS. The prosecutor who presided over the case said that at the beginning of the investigation, Tang Yunnan had been very calm and answered questions almost without leaking. The investigators know very well that this case is a nest case, and others have confessed to Tang Yunnan, so it is difficult for Tang Yunnan to be immune. Since it is not feasible to get to the point, let him out first and see what his next "activity" is. Sure enough, on the night of his release, Tang Yunnan began to "save himself" with a new mobile phone number. This number was given to him a few months ago and he has never used it. That night, in about half an hour, he used this number to call and send text messages to the parents of relevant students and Tang and others. These collusion behaviors provide strong evidence to prove the criminal facts of Tang Yunnan. When Tang Yunnan called Li, who delivered the money, Li didn't answer in the field. He immediately sent a short message: "Brother, please answer the phone or call." After Li called back, Tang Yunnan explicitly asked him to commit perjury in the investigation of the relevant departments. There is a message sent by Tang Yunnan to Zeng, who once sent money to parents of students. He taught Zeng in the name of others. "If someone from the people's procuratorate comes to see you, just say that several children are in junior high school. Because the big leader said hello, only one paid 20 thousand, and the rest didn't pay a penny. Don't speak ill of others. " There is also a message sent to Tang, a salesman of an electronic equipment factory in Guilin: "You should leave Guangxi as soon as possible, the sooner the better, the more urgent the better! ! ! ! ! ! ! "I used seven exclamation points in a row, which shows my eagerness.
The "interference right" exposes the regulatory issues.
The investigators who had contact with Tang Yunnan said that objectively speaking, Tang Yunnan was a person with high IQ. He has a smart mind and rigorous thinking, and has made great achievements in the field of education. He should be said to be a talented educator. In the online forum of the High School Attached to Xida University, the students of the school spontaneously launched a post to select outstanding teachers, among which the evaluation of Tang Yunnan was as follows: "Tang Yunnan, the principal of the High School Attached to Xida University, is an amiable and excellent teacher with rich scientific research achievements. According to his adaptation of the short film "Super Teacher-Tang Yunnan", he won the best documentary photography award at the third' Bronze Award 'DV Film Festival of Guangxi University. " The investigators said that because of this, the social harm brought by this case is even greater. It not only violates the ownership of public property and the country's clean government system, but also destroys the purity of teachers, which is more likely to bring psychological shadow to students studying in the middle school attached to West University. The problems reflected in this case are thought-provoking. Tang Yunnan and others were sentenced, in addition to subjective reasons such as the expansion of selfish desires, objectively related to the lack of power constraints and inadequate external supervision. The government affairs of the middle school attached to Xida University are not open, and ordinary people can't supervise them. The occurrence of this case exposed the common problems in the supervision mechanism, such as "the superior supervision is far away, the peer supervision is soft, the subordinate supervision is difficult, and the law and discipline supervision is late".