Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - The employment pressure of college students is not conducive to success.
The employment pressure of college students is not conducive to success.
165438+1October 16 18:30 in the lecture hall of Nanshan campus, the first game of the second round of the "Shu Ren Cup" debate organized by the Youth League Committee of Shaoxing University is going on. The topic of this debate is "Is the employment pressure of college students conducive to success? The debaters are Fang Lin, kun yang, Wang Xiaolan and Jiang Chenyang from the Ministry of Education. Their view is that the employment pressure of college students is conducive to success. The debaters are Wang Li, Cao, Feifei Zhang and Zhong from Medical College. Their view is that the employment pressure of college students is not conducive to success.

Some people think that with the increase of pressure, college students spend more time and energy to improve their comprehensive quality, show themselves better, give full play to their subjective initiative and enhance their faith and perseverance. Therefore, the employment pressure of college students is conducive to success. The wonderful speech of the positive debate aroused warm applause from the audience, and the negative debate was not inferior. She believes that employment pressure prevents them from giving full play to their talents and affects their initiative and enthusiasm. When the pressure exceeds their tolerance, it may lead to psychological problems. After a contest between the two sides, the free and open debate that followed was also Long Hudou, which was hard to compete. They all cited classic examples and accurate and specific data to demonstrate their views. Among them, it has been mentioned many times that several American presidents worked hard under great pressure and finally succeeded.

While the contestants were eloquent, the audience also actively participated, and then there were wonderful questions from the audience. The questions put forward by the audience were extremely incisive, the contestants answered comprehensively and accurately, and the whole lecture hall applauded constantly. Wonderful moments are always short-lived, and the debate ended in cheers and applause. Finally, the deputy editor-in-chief of the journal of Shaoxing University of Arts and Sciences commented on the contest. He thought it was wonderful and excellent, especially the opening statement of the debate was quite accurate. The only fly in the ointment was that the two sides slightly digressed in the free debate.

The champion of this debate is the Education Department, and the best debater is Cao, the second debater of the opposing medical college.