Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - Female students of flying university
Female students of flying university
According to media reports, on May 12, a female college student in Zhangjiajie, Hunan Province disappeared after deviating from the wing-mounted flight route in Tianmen Mountain. Since the accident, the search and rescue work has been uninterrupted. However, the missing female college students did not carry mobile phones, GPS and other equipment. The continuous rainfall, large clouds, low visibility and steep and complicated terrain brought great difficulties to the search and rescue work. So far, no missing female students have been found.

In fact, even the missing female college students may not "crash". However, "Lost for Four Days" always gives people some sense of uncertainty. After all, as far as the extreme sport of "wing-mounted flight" is concerned, there are great risks in itself. Coupled with the steep mountains and long-term loss of contact, people will naturally have pessimistic ideas.

Even after the report was published, there was a commotion on social media. In the basic knowledge, "finding girls" or "first". However, there are different voices about the established "extreme accidents". Among them, "death theory" is more powerful. Because when it comes to search and rescue, people always think that it is a consumption of public resources.

Of course, this does not mean that "people should not be saved", but that as an extreme sports accident, this is "responsibility". In addition, many people think that this kind of high-risk extreme sports should not exist at all. Therefore, when an extreme accident happens, he or she will regard it as "the result of death" and will not give too much sympathy.

Therefore, in similar "extreme accidents", the public is often more concerned about the hidden dangers of extreme sports than the search and rescue work. Therefore, the extension of public opinion space may focus more on the hidden problems behind the "wing service flight" for the "Tianmenshan female college students' flight loss incident".

After all, extreme sports are dangerous and are not recognized in China. Because generally speaking, people think that sports that may endanger life should not be advocated. This leads to the great difference in what we call the limit of life. Therefore, this is not so much a debate about extreme sports accidents as a cognitive debate about life itself.

If we only look at the key word "Tianmenshan female college students lose their wings" in the report, it always makes people feel that female college students are a little "crazy". In fact, the missing female college students have received professional training in the "wing suit flight" system abroad and have hundreds of experience in wing suit flight and skydiving. After all, the female college students who lost contact are all professionals, not crazy experts.

It is reported that this "wing suit flight" is not her "solo flight", but the organization of "activity shooting" (shooting extreme sports documentary). Therefore, it is more appropriate to make a qualitative analysis of the case of the loss of wing clothes of female college students in Tianmenshan, and take "mistakes" as the conclusion. In a sense, there may be "mistakes" in sports that do not raise risks, even low-risk sports.

But high-risk "mistakes" are often life-threatening. Therefore, when it comes to specific "mistakes", people tend to be more emotional. Even if we interview the "winged pilots", you will find that they are very scared and even regard every flight as "the last flight".

From this, we can understand why the formation of "death theory" is more a combination of "excitement" and "tragedy" in a sense. "Excitement" mostly means "danger" and "tragedy" is more the result of "danger". Therefore, it is easy to generalize death. This is especially true for people who don't understand extreme sports.

In fact, professional extreme sports are not blindly challenging the limits. There will be professional study and training to a great extent. After all, no one thinks that safety is not important. In fact, when an extreme athlete enters the field of extreme sports, risk awareness is the first thing in his mind. Because, everyone knows, there is no life, how to play the limit.

Therefore, to a great extent, people who advocate "death theory" should be "outsiders". As a real extreme sport, it is not so blasphemous. Judging from the nature of the debate, this also reflects the basic realistic dilemma of "all walks of life are like mountains". After all, "contempt for danger" does not mean not loving life and not being responsible for it.

Want to know. Different people have different views on the meaning of life, and there is no unified conclusion. Many people don't understand why extreme sports enthusiasts always feel dangerous and not worth pursuing when they are "dead". However, for extreme sports enthusiasts, perhaps the meaning of life lies in exploring extreme excitement. Of course, there is no need to "commit suicide", and this premise still needs to be announced.

In a sense, "limit" itself is "pleasure", that is, to feel the charm of life by challenging the limit of the human body. To tell the truth, to some extent, this is just a love for life, not an irresponsibility for life. Of course, this kind of love is more based on spiritual feedback than just the maintenance of living conditions.

In this regard, it is normal to have differences. In fact, the individual's choice of life state is the process of choice. Anything is allowed as long as it doesn't affect others. At the same time, we should understand that the world is rich and individuals are different. Therefore, when you don't understand, don't take your own cognition as the criterion of everything.

In addition, "consuming public resources" should not be treated differently because of the label of "extreme sports". In a sense, the high risk of extreme sports should not be the original sin. Therefore, as a kind of public opinion, we should pay more attention to the safety of the missing persons, rather than focusing on the reasons of the missing persons themselves.

Because, back to the category of losing female college students, her family may have been worried. Therefore, as a trend of public opinion, we should be more "people-oriented" and understand the theory of death more rationally and cautiously. Otherwise, the risk of "wing-mounted flight" may be easier to prove than the scale of unscrupulous speech.

Then, going back to "the loss of female college students in Tianmenshan flying with wings", as far as public discussion is concerned, we can ask about the risk of "flying with wings", but the final destination must be based on the light of human nature. Must fall at the peak of common sense. Only in this way can the "missing female college student" and her family see hope and avoid "self-doubt" and "self-criticism".