This is in stark contrast to the fact that European and American university teachers each have an office. In the minds of some university administrators, it is always believed that the richest resource in China is human resources, so it is not enough to cherish talents, let alone cultivate and support them. Under the guidance of this concept, it is obviously impossible for colleges and universities to cultivate a team of high-quality teachers and a group of masters who can enjoy a good reputation at home and abroad. The biggest or most fundamental difference between high-level universities and ordinary universities may not be in management and school buildings, but in the level of teachers.

Only with high-level teachers can there be high-level teaching and high-level scientific research. Therefore, colleges and universities must vigorously cultivate their own academic masters and masters in order to promote the improvement of the overall teacher level and education quality. ?

The relationship between academics and academic evaluation system. If colleges and universities want to develop, so do college teachers. At present, the evaluation system for teachers is mainly scientific research besides teaching. Scientific research assessment mainly depends on two aspects: one is to look at the commitment of related topics, and the other is the publication (publication) of papers (works), especially those published in core journals. As far as the subject is concerned, it is very necessary as an important form of scientific research. However, in some local and university projects, there are some worrying phenomena from declaration to conclusion, from professional title evaluation to subject evaluation. For example, there are some unreasonable places in project approval. Those who are able to complete the project may not be able to apply for the project, and those who can apply for the project may not be able to complete it; Pay attention to the early declaration, not to the later results inspection; In the evaluation of professional titles, professional disciplines and scientific research awards, there is a tendency to focus only on topics, and it seems that if you don't undertake topics, the value of academic research will be greatly reduced.

All these make serious subject research commercialized and secularized. In this case, if we want to declare and evaluate the subject objectively and fairly, and complete the research of the subject with high quality, we lack the minimum environment of fair competition. Moreover, the so-called assessment of papers is not to look at the quality of papers, but to see whether they are core journals and whether they are included and reprinted by relevant institutions (such as SCI and CSSCI).

This kind of assessment seems fair, but in fact it contains a serious crisis. You know, there are only a few hundred core journals in China, and there are so many teachers, researchers and graduate students waiting for their own achievements to be published every year. If everyone is competing for core journals, why are there so many pages?